Omarchy should not matter. But sadly it does. As a power grab.

If you don’t know what Omarchy is here’s the short summary. David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of RubyOnRails, owner of a software business and millionaire, decided a few months ago to go all in on Linux and – because that’s just his MO – thought that turning his setup into a project made sense. Omarchy is just that: A pretty standard Arch Linux distribution with a handful of configuration files, that Heinemeier Hansson (or DHH as he is often called) wrote, or vibed or whatever. There is nothing wrong with this, custom, opinionated special purpose distributions have been part of the Linux culture for a long time and provide a lot of value and experimentation that sometimes even flows back to the original project. In a way Ubuntu Linux is just that to the basis Debian.

There’s also nothing wrong in more opinionated software – quite the opposite. I do think that RubyOnRails and similar frameworks gained traction especially because they do have a clear idea of how they see the respective problem domain. There’s even the statement “There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it” in the Zen of Python. Having a strong point of view is not a bad thing in software or in general. The problem is the kind of points of view DHH has.

I don’t want to go into all the gritty details here, Brennan Kenneth Brown did a great job with their article “Normalized Fascism in Open Source: $12 Million Given to DHH“, but here’s the short version. DHH is a racist and a fascist. He recently wrote articles on how there are [Content Warning: massive racism] too many brown people in London these days. In July he wrote an [Content Warning: Racism, anti-romanism] article comparing Roma communities (using a slur for them) to “wolves” that should be “shot”. His X account is also know to be “edgy” in a similar way. A few days ago he posted sort of a manifesto for his set of config files:

There’s even a longer version on the website. Even without a strong background in antifascist literature or history this reads like a fascist creed. About unity and identity. About “holding the line” (against codes of conduct and the rights of marginalized people as the website explains). About how there always needs to be a strong leader who makes the decisions. Given DHH’s other writing this is not a misguided joke, this is how he thinks about the world.

I began this text writing “Omarchy should not matter” but I have not explained why it does. It’s surely not about user numbers (it’s a clunky distro aimed at people who love to cosplay hackers). But it is about power.

DHH has used his connection to CEO’s of tech corporations and his position as influencer to collect up to now above 18 million dollars of funding for Omarchy. He uses that money not for himself (he has enough of that) but to fund certain pieces of Software he uses in his distribution. Like for example the window manager hyprland whose main developer the Omarchy money now funds. What is “Vaxry” known for outside of a niche window manager? He runs a community based around LGBTQ discrimination and participates in that (see the short summary on Drew DeVault’s “Weird Little Guys of FOSS” list). His bigotry is so consistent that he was banned from participating in the Freedesktop.org community where all the other developers of window managers and the free software desktop stack collaborate. And it was long before DHH funded him.

One could see a world where a CEO using his connections to drum up some funding for free software projects would be a good thing. But that’s not the world we live in I am afraid. DHH got 3 million USD from Digital Ocean (a cloud provider) for Omarchy. Basically at the same time where Digital Ocean cancelled their support of Flathub and GNOME that amounted to a value of 50 USD per month.

DHH is using his position and his influence to accumulate donations that he then can distribute to projects that align with his fascist worldview and ambitions. And in a time where many important projects and infrastructures are strapped for cash running just on the goodwill of a handful of people that is increasingly dangerous. Not because its corporate money – a lot of funding for open source comes from corporations, they are after all who are sucking up all the surplus from people’s labor. It’s because this amount of money gives him power.

The Omarchy foundation will be where projects in desperate need of funding will be pointed. And will a project focused on human rights and social justice get funding from our fascist overlord? What kind of pressure can that exert on projects who have to decide to either die due to lack of funding or kill their code of conduct?

An open fascist is building one of the bigger sources of funding for open source fully under his individual control and sucks up a lot of money that otherwise might have gone to liberatory projects. Community projects. Antifascist projects.

And that is why Omarchy matters. Sadly. Not because of its technical merit (even though those fascists love to use the “merit” argument to fight human rights) but because of its leader, his connections and his ability to accumulate financial power. Without anyone in that ecosystem saying anything about how that leader operates and talks. And you might know the saying: If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

Omarchy got a lot of recognition recently. Not only by corporate donors but by Youtubers and other tech influencers who kept praising it and nudged people (who might not know about DHH’s exploits) towards testing it. To become “a hardcore linux user/dev” or whatever other chauvinist argument they made. This makes it dangerous.

Running Omarchy means contributing to this dynamic. It means willingly integrating oneself into a fascist community. Legitimizing it. Supporting it. Omarchy is a fascist project that normalizes fascist thinking for everyone entering that community (even unknowingly). The baseline has to be not to use that system. And as people who believe in human rights and dignity, in community and a tech world that can be better we need to oppose Omarchy. Need to make sure it gets no seat at any table. Support projects who actively refuse to collaborate. Support projects who care about human rights and flourishing. And do not do business with the companies who willingly support fascists.

Siamo tutti antifascisti!

(Share this message about Omarchy [or some other similar post] around in the tech circles you frequent. Tell people about the background of this hyped Linux distribution and its fascist leader. Quit your 1password or Digital Ocean accounts and mention that it is because the support fascists.)

  • CallMeAl (like Alan) ( CallMeAl@piefed.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or I can ignore Omarchy. I can continue to use and support the open source projects I like. I’ve been a happy linux and open source user for 25+ years. So far no asshole with money has been able to mess it up yet and I don’t see that changing. Many have tried.

    • lemmyvore ( lemmyvore@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not you (an informed user) that they’re after, it’s about public perception of Linux.

      I would go as far as to say Omarchy is an attack on all Linux distros.

      It’s the notion that you can just “dial up some tech” that has been doing widespread harm to all branches of IT, shaking up the public trust in technology and confusing what “reliable” means for IT.

      If Omarchy succeeds in having AI create a usable Linux distro it would fundamentally alter the optics of “manually” created distros and the public’s trust in them. And it probably can, given massive amounts of money and resources. Hence all the millions being poured into it.

      It’s the old “embrace, extend, extinguish” strategy in a new form.

        • lemmyvore ( lemmyvore@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not for lack of trying, mind you. Previous attempts were eventually thwarted after decade-long efforts, which is also how this one looks like it’s shaping up.

          It’s also worth pointing out that in previous cases there were champions of the industry that stood up for Linux and countered with equal amounts of money into things like lawsuits and marketing on the supporting side.

          Furthermore this attack is of the FUD variety (fear, uncertainty and doubt) which is harder to counter.

          • CallMeAl (like Alan) ( CallMeAl@piefed.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Kindly point me to three generalist, widely known XMPP servers.

            The lack of generalist widely known XMPP servers has nothing to do with the fact that today anyone who wants to deploy a modern up to date XMPP server can do so, and has choices. There are also modern actively maintained clients. That’s my point. There are also many general free servers to join, even if not well known.

            If you base the value of something on its popularity rather than its utility, then we aren’t concerned about the same things. As long as I can use the software I want to use in the way I want to use it, then I’m a happy user. I can’t control what other people use.

            • refalo ( refalo@programming.dev ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              As long as I can use the software I want to use in the way I want to use it, then I’m a happy user. I can’t control what other people use.

              Yes, but will you really be happy if none of the people you want to talk to will use the same service? I would argue popularity does matter to a lot of people in a way that can still affect you.

          • CallMeAl (like Alan) ( CallMeAl@piefed.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Doesn’t mean it’s immune.

            That is what it means.

            Any project with a GPL or similar license is effectively immune from takeover.

            As long as there is someone with the skills and interest with access to the source (and there are legions), they can use it. If someone wants to keep it the way it was or change it in some big way, they can fork it.

            Every time there has been a corp buyout or ideological divide, the people exercise their rights and projects fork, preserving the independence and community values.

  • mmmm ( mmmm@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    And as said in another post some days ago, I fear posts like this would cause a Streisand effect. Not cool to give them free publicity.

    • squeeb ( squeeb@quokk.au ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rather than the Streisand effect which is about attempts to censor information, its probably more accurately described by a term I recently learned about (coined by Lee Vinsel and popularised by Cory Doctorow in his various writings): ‘Criti-hype’.

      Doctorow uses it to describe how a lot of online AI criticism is actually feeding the so-called “growth story” that makes AI look attractive to investors (i.e., by tacitly accepting the narrative that AI is actually good enough to ‘take our jobs’, for example) which leads to greater and greater stock valuations of AI companies, and therefore continued AI bubble inflation.

      I see the parallels here, not sure if it’s 100% applicable, but thought I’d throw it out there

    • thingsiplay ( thingsiplay@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is not really comparable to Streisand effect, because posts like these do not try to hide Omarchy. In fact this post is the opposite. People (posts like these) are concerned and want to discuss. We should let them. Do not mute yourself over topics that need to be addressed. I mean you personally can do, but don’t tell others not to post. Just my opinion.

    • Luke ( lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ignoring fascists and hoping they go away is one reason why fascism is having a resurgence right now. Immoral behavior should be challenged as widely and publicly as necessary to make everyone aware that it’s inappropriate. People don’t stop doing immoral things unless there are social consequences for it.

    • thingsiplay ( thingsiplay@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      Let people discuss stuff they want and need to discuss. You do not have to click the topic and read it. People have concerns and they want to discuss it, we should not try to mute because there is a huge interest by many.

      • vas ( vas@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Negative attention is also attention”. In the Linux community where we are in, the fascist DHH was already discussed at least once (in fact multiple times) in the last weeks.

        I think suppressing this topic until they run out of money is a better strategy than every time trying to do holy wars. Of course the situation is different if you notice that the person whom you’re speaking with may not yet know. That is not really the case in https://lemmy.ml/c/linux

        • This is not about attention, this is about enlightenment. And even if its negative attention in addition, people want to discuss and they should. Just because it gets attention should not be a reason to silence opinions and their need to talk about it with others.

          • just another dev ( admin@lemmy.my-box.dev ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Meanwhile the other day a post here asking “What actually is the deal with Omarchy?” got deleted.

            I feel this is more about people signaling they dislike he who should not be named (other than initials) than, you know, what is actually wrong with the product.

            The same thing happened with the technology communities and Trump / Musk. I sincerely do not care about these people or their opinions. I’m here for the tech news, not a circlejerk about whom the Internet considers a nazi. I guess I will just have to add a few more keywords to filter now.

            • Meanwhile the other day a post here asking “What actually is the deal with Omarchy?” got deleted.

              Important to know why it was deleted. As I cannot see in the content and discussion, I cannot verify what happened. So bringing this up isn’t really meaningful as a point then. Now if it was deleted for reasons you suggest (because they don’t want positive attention as I get it from your reply), then yes, that would be bad. But how do we check this? It might had a different reason.

              I will just have to add a few more keywords to filter now.

              I didn’t know this was possible on Lemmy! Care to explain where this can be done? Or is it maybe your client that allows that. On the webpage lemmy.ml with a browser I don’t see any method of keyword filters.

          • vas ( vas@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            this is about enlightenment

            For me personally, I see enlightment - especially that particular word - in the process of self-perfection and leaning the truth.

            I mean, I don’t mind that you have your opinion. It’s just funny to me that you chose this word of all. One that has nothing to do with the reputation system.

  • psycotica0 ( psycotica0@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    One thing I haven’t really figured out yet, and it may be because there isn’t an answer, is why some of these companies could plausibly be genuinely sending money to Omarchy.

    Like, Digital Ocean. They’re a headless server company. So… why are they donating anything to a desktop distro? There’s nothing Digital Oceany about Omarchy as far as I understand.

    It feels like someone was like “Guys, I made open source chicken feed” and Linode was like “son of a bitch I’m in”, I just don’t get it.

    Ignoring the part where they just like the vibes and want to spend their money on… favour? I don’t even know that the company pretends to get out of it… Like, how would one pitch this expense to shareholders? We use company money to fund projects we don’t use, that have nothing to do with our business, because the guy running the project we don’t use is mean to people who aren’t white enough for him? And that’s what we’re spending your money on?

    • Majestic ( Majestic@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well could be these companies are buying on fascism because they’re either run by fascists or being shaken down by fascists or their friends are fascists encouraging them to do this and they uncritically do so for some vague or not so vague promises. So it’s more a signal of obedience and doubling down on the move to open, naked reaction and taking over open source with fascism.

      That or its an intelligence op and the fascism is a bonus but the guy behind it is just pliable or a useful tool and there are larger plans to use this as a vehicle for influence to control open source, insert back-doors, push CIA coder guys into the right positions, steer in anti-China stuff to carve up the world of open source into strictly divided western and non-western code, remove openness and cooperation and militarize the space for American use.

      Either way not good as functionally this is a big money pot being created and centralized under reactionary control to bully open source into adopting reactionary politics and other not good things. Could be Linux is seen as increasingly a threat with the open spying on Microsoft driving enough of the public to Linux that corporations, governments, etc feel a need now to seize control of it.

      • psycotica0 ( psycotica0@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        😛

        It’s not that that’s confusing me, I think I’m just surprised at the nakedness. Like, yeah, big business supports fascism, but often still have a pretense. Like, oh I’m investing in the industry, and the industry produces tanks, and there happens to be a conflict on the horizon, and you can pretend it’s just an investment in business. Or whatever.

        But this feels like a dude, who isn’t in government or anything, put up a sign that says “I’m a prick”, and then a bunch of companies fell over themselves to give him money for… nothing in return. It’s like the business equivalent of sending all your money to a megachurch televangelist or something!

        Again, if I were on the board of one of those companies, or a shareholder in it, I might be like “wait, why did we send this guy 30 million dollars? Even if I’m pro fascism… what does that money… get us? What did we spend it on?”

    • orc girly ( orc_princess@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Private capital supported and bankrolled Hitler, Mussolini and plenty of other fascists, if you have the time and energy to read a book on it, Blackshirts and Reds explains this better and it’s fairly accessible!

  • comrade ( ejs@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    i’m so incredibly annoyed by the fact that my previously favorite hosting provider digital ocean decided to fund this ridiculousness… any favorite alternatives anyone can offer?

  • droopy4096 ( droopy4096@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    IMO it’s the same situation as with POTUS45 and POTUS47 elections. Not talking about twisted facts and criminal behaviour would be to condone it and speaking out creates publicity.

    Word fascism got (intentionally)overloaded over the last decade and means very little to a lot of people, reducing it to equivalent of “jerk” rather than evoke memories and feelings towards atrocities of WWII etc. So we need a better language 'cause when we call someone fascist today many tune out.

    All of this is to say that I see nothing wrong with contents of the article but I suspect it has very little of desired effect due to the above. There must be a better way, but at the moment I do not know what is it.

  • deathbird ( deathbird@mander.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I… what? This literally says nothing. The title promised me a description of a power grab, but the actual contents are just “DHH sux”. Even accepting that premise as I do…no power grab is described.

    • And it’s disingenuous at that. I’ve been trying to figure out why this guy is a fascist through all these posts and comments that keep popping up and it seems like the common thread is that he’s against immigration. Which… fair. That can definitely be a dog whistle. But when I keep seeing things like “he says they should all be shot” when I’ve read the quote myself and that’s not the point he was making; it kind of makes me doubt the rest too.

      If he’s a bad dude, say the bad things and let me make the decision myself, your exaggerations are hurting your own cause.

      • elixir_fan ( elixir_fan@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        He’s not simply “against immigration”, he finds Tommy Robinson “heartwarming”. You may not know a whole lot about the far-right, but it doesn’t take a genius to see what he’s doing.

      • deathbird ( deathbird@mander.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, I do think he approaches fascist ideology with his blog posts, and he seems to also be a credulous rube when it comes to AI, but I will admit that in his blog post he argues for deportation, not killing. (Deporting to where? Unclear. Roma can come from various EU nations, including Denmark.)

        But even given that I don’t like the guy, I have to ask, does he harm libre software, and does using his libre software harm other people the way his preferred immigration policies would? To me the answers seem to be no on both counts. Will I be suspicious of his work? Maybe, but suspicion isn’t prejudgment. Will I financially support him in any way? Hell no, he can spend that Dell money on his own. But the beauty of free software is that it is free, and you are not bound by the politics of its creator.

  • motruck ( motruck@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Instead of focusing so much on hating something highlight things you love like Archlinux and stop reporting on things you don’t like. Reporting on them does the opposite of what you want.

  • Vgcjt ( Vgcjt@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That was very long. Linux is like 6 percent of the personal computing share and thenvast majority of that share is Ubuntu. There will always be an open platform somewhere because that is the nature of open projects. I wouldnt worry too much abour some dipshit billionaire’s pet project. Omarchy will probably fall as fast as it rose like any other trendy.OS.

  • obnomus ( Obnomus@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I read the wolf blog and yeah fucked up stuff. Idk what happens but if Linux projects profits from him idc, people need money to work, devs get money. It really subjective like if you’ll use a project that is funded by him.

  • en1gma ( en1gma@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree for the most part, except for the use of the terms “fascist” and “racist.” Those terms are used far too quickly and far too often. This weakens and normalizes them.

    Not everyone who criticizes migration is automatically a racist. Not everyone who loves capitalism and liberalism is automatically a fascist.

    That’s no justification for DHH and his supporters. My point is simply that these days, people are far too quick to throw around extreme terms online without thinking things through, just because someone has a different opinion. Just as, for the right wing, everything is always immediately labeled as socialism and/or communism.

    As a result, the lines of conflict keep drifting further apart, making dialogue impossible—and that only strengthens the true extremists.