• tankiesmasher ( tankiesmasher@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      Iraq and Saudi Arabia don’t do public executions these days, and none of them besides the US live stream them. Apparently they’re the first country to ever do it.

      The real problem is the reasons some of these countries condemn people to death, regardless of the barbarism they engage in while carrying it out.

      The US’s actions are only notable because they are held to a higher standard, rightly so.

      • arbilp3 ( arbilp3@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I don’t think the US empire is held to a higher standard. I say this holding nothing against everyday US citizens. I mean the power structure of the US has been mistrusted for a very long time but because of their financial/military power, most countries have bowed their heads to them. Not necessarily out of respect.

        It is the propaganda narrative which every US citizen grows up with that makes them think they have a high standard.

        • tankiesmasher ( tankiesmasher@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I mean if you want to argue that it should be an even standard across the board I might agree with you, like I would hold Iran in infinitely lower esteem for hanging political dissidents, to say nothing of them doing it publically.

          But something rubs me the wrong way about America, the shining city on the hill, even dipping its toes in this kind of barbaric spectacle.

          Whether it’s because I hold them to a higher standard, or because I view it as a betrayal of what liberal democracy means.

  • MisterFrog ( MisterFrog@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is where I find the Greens not effective.

    Banning it from being livestreamed is impossible and will do nothing.

    The government should be condemning the US government for still having the death penalty, and use this as an opportunity to make the arguments to why the death penalty is stupid.

    And further why it’s so important for us to not be wholly in bed with the US on everything.

    • Ilandar ( Ilandar@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 days ago

      This is where I find the Greens not effective.

      Very strange criticism for a minor party that is not in government.

      The government should be condemning the US government for still having the death penalty, and use this as an opportunity to make the arguments to why the death penalty is stupid.

      Is this supposed to be your very sensible, realistic alternative? Have you been paying attention during the last decade of Australian/US relations?

      And further why it’s so important for us to not be wholly in bed with the US on everything.

      This is the position of The Greens, and has been for years.

      • MisterFrog ( MisterFrog@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        What I mean is effective in their political messaging.

        I don’t disagree with them on this, otherwise. It’s fucked. And should be prohibited on all Australian media, online or otherwise.

        But part of the conversation now, annoyingly, is whether it’s even feasible to ban all streaming.

        I will admit that my criticism was probably a bit overblown, and influenced emotionally by my general dislike of the Greens’ ideas about affecting societal change. (i.e. they’re not anti-capitalist, aren’t democratic in their party structure, and believe we can reform our way to something better through parliament)

        I’ll take them over Labor any day though, their heart is in the right place as a party.

        • blind3rdeye ( blind3rdeye@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          I kind of agree in the sense that (in my view) preventing Australians from watching the US execution is a kind of a fridge issue - possibly a distraction from more important issues, possible a unnecessarily divisive position for The Greens to take. (Probably most people agree that broadcasting the execution is bad; but many people are sensitive about censorship.)

          So in that sense perhaps it is a politically unsavvy thing for The Greens to take a position on. But on the other hand, saying & doing stuff like this is what gets them into the media. When The Greens are only talking about pencil-pushing bean-counting by-the-numbers sensible policies on core issues - they are simply ignored. A few people nod and say ‘fair call’, and no one says anything. No one spreads the word. And so very very few people hear anything about it. So when The Green stick to their core message, they just don’t heard. So these little provocative foraying to side-issue end up being pretty much the only news many people hear about The Greens at all.

        • Ilandar ( Ilandar@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Fair enough, I appreciate you adding some nuance to your argument and I can see where you’re coming from. I think their argument for a ban is actually way more feasible than Labor openly criticising the US, though. Labor clearly tries very hard to avoid offending this US administration and would never take a such a strong stand on an issue like this.

          Whether a ban would actually be effective in terms of stopping every Australian from viewing the execution is another issue, but in terms of actually implementing something that may have some level of effect, a ban is pretty sensible. That’s exactly the type of solution Labor would go for.

    • tankiesmasher ( tankiesmasher@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      How myopic. I didn’t realise America’s sole focus since it’s inception has been terror and barbarism. I guess PEPFAR, USAID, the civil rights act, the Marshall Plan, fighting smallpox and polio, and international disaster relief were just cosmic whoopsies that materialised from the ether.

  • Play it live on every channel, every screen in the country. Put it on repeat. Show it on street corners and in pubs. Show it in primary schools and high schools. Everyone should see what we’re endorsing by being a US client state. Let those who want to revel in their inhumanity go over every sick detail with glee.

    • Nath ( Nath@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      A website is not a broadcast. So, it can (and would) disallow the content from being broadcast on TV. But not from a webpage.

      While we are at discussing the idea, it kinda won’t work. You can block all of the Internet or none of the Internet. You can’t block some of the Internet. If you ‘block’ a site from Australia, people can and will simply VPN to another country and access it there.

    • Stigger32 ( Stigger32@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes. At the very least it will be heavily cut and blurred.

      It’s only platforms like YouTube that will be able to stream it censor free.

      And therein lies the rub. Most are aware of this. And so they call for it to be stopped. Even as they ponder the ability/outcome of censorship…

      It’s almost like the movie Idiocracy was an actual prophecy…🤣

  • ryannathans ( ryannathans@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    There are already 82837463829 execution videos available online. If it’s even going to be broadcast, and with no protection or authentication (doubt), just don’t watch it. And don’t give us that bullshit “protect the kids” answer. How effective was the social media ban? 7% of kids actually blocked going by the last report?