Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
schizoidman ( schizoidman@lemmy.zip )  to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 20 hours ago

Diplomatic sources: ‘The Netherlands is negotiating the dismantling of the International Criminal Court’

rightsforum.org

external-link
message-square
25
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
56
external-link

Diplomatic sources: ‘The Netherlands is negotiating the dismantling of the International Criminal Court’

rightsforum.org

schizoidman ( schizoidman@lemmy.zip )  to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 20 hours ago
message-square
25
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
Diplomatic sources: ‘The Netherlands is negotiating the dismantling of the International Criminal Court’ - The Rights Forum
rightsforum.org
external-link
Under pressure from US sanctions against the International Criminal Court, the Netherlands is cooperating in its dismantling, sources say.

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.world/post/54365981

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Safeguard ( Safeguard@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    No the fuck we are not!?!?

    People would tearing up their own cabinet and then march upon the US embacy. So… no…

  • Vincent ( Vincent@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It feels to me like these measure are not up to the host country to negotiate? i.e. the ICC participatory countries would have to decide on this?

    In any case, I haven’t seen this in Dutch news yet.

  • finisfa ( finisfa@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Trump is a pig, and I honestly hope he will stop soon. Stop with what? I can’t tell, it is illegal in my country.

  • Gsus4 ( Gsus4@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ok, who else wants to host the court if the dutch chicken out? It is not owned by any country, but of course tramp/bibi/putain dont know that…

    • Zwuzelmaus ( Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Belgium or France must fill the gap.

      All of us others don’t have the heart.

      But maybe, if the few corrupted dutch are singled out… there is still hope.

      • Malyca ( Malyca@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Israel wants the court gone, guess who they will side with?

      • plyth ( plyth@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Is there no other option internationally? Vietnam or India should be stable enough and independent enough to host it. Even China could be possible if pressure from the US is the problem.

        • Envidon ( Envidon@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          South Africa or Ireland, some of the only countries that seem to be willing to speak up for international justice. Though I guess smaller countries will be more sensitive to economic sanctions from globql superpowers.

        • SpacemanSpiff ( SpacemanSpiff@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You think India, the country of nationalistic mob attacks on minorities, is fit to house the international criminal court?

          • plyth ( plyth@feddit.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Right, that’s a problem. So Vietnam? Any other country?

            • AllNewTypeFace ( AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              A Communist one-party state hosting it would be somewhat polarising.

              Maybe Switzerland could?

              • comrade_twisty ( comrade_twisty@feddit.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Random person from Switzerland here.

                Sure, how much money is in it for us?

                • Malyca ( Malyca@lemmy.zip ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  You would be the logical choice.

            • SpacemanSpiff ( SpacemanSpiff@lemmy.zip ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Other than South Africa, I’d probably go somewhere in Europe that’s relatively independent, like Spain or Sweden. Wouldn’t pick Norway because of their history of giving US presidents the Nobel peace prize while they’re literally slaughtering people. Wouldn’t go with Switzerland because of their shady finance sector. Wouldn’t go with the UK because they are an American lapdog.

              • AllNewTypeFace ( AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Sweden’s quite right-wing, and Spain is likely to have a Vox-led neo-Falangist government after the next election.

        • Zwuzelmaus ( Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It is not only the question if a country is far away enough from Usa. China or India, they have such a different view about what justice is. I think it wouldn’t do well.

          • plyth ( plyth@feddit.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            They would not run the court, just host it.

            There are conflicting political interests but how does the understanding of justice differ?

  • stylusmobilus ( stylusmobilus@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s it

    Keep going, because once it all blows up these shitcunts go down with the rest of us

    • Zedstrian ( Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      People with enough money or power will survive even the worst of political outcomes.

      • dou9m ( dou9m@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This just ragebaited Gaddafi into resurrecting, which ended up proving you right which then allowed him to peacefully pass away.

        You birthed and killed Gaddafi. You monster.

        • plyth ( plyth@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          People with enough money or power

          It was not enough.

        • Zedstrian ( Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You birthed and killed Gaddafi. You monster.

          Not too far off from an old Onion video.

          • dou9m ( dou9m@lemmy.ca ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Holy fuck. I feel like I can guarantee someone at the Heritage Foundation laughed at this video, looked over and saw Trump on their computer, and immediately said: “holy fuck i have a plan”

      • stylusmobilus ( stylusmobilus@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No, they won’t. Not once it fully breaks down.

        This is what they don’t understand

        • dou9m ( dou9m@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Considering most of them are late boomers / gen X, they probably know they can survive for their lifetimes theoretically and logistically, which is probably true enough in most “safe” climate zones for the next 50ish years.

          Their narcissism? Nearly completely prevents them from thinking about how quickly their mentals would go to shit.

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 301 users / day
  • 1.34K users / week
  • 2.68K users / month
  • 5.51K users / 6 months
  • 40 local subscribers
  • 12.5K subscribers
  • 8.38K Posts
  • 29.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • federal reverse ( federalreverse@feddit.org ) 
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • adr1an ( anzo@programming.dev ) 
  • !Europe Mod Team ( EuroMod@feddit.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code