• Hot Saucerman ( dingus@lemmy.ml ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          He ascribes to Longtermism and like his associate Jeffery Epstein, he thinks his genes are magically special, and so he wants as many offspring as humanly possible: while not actually giving one shit about the quality of life for any of them.

          It’s really interesting, because he fucking hates his own father (Errol is also a creep who fathered a child with his step-daughter, who he raised from childhood), but can’t put together that he is exactly the fuck the same as his creep ass father.

          • fubo ( fubo@lemmy.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            Longtermism doesn’t have to do with one’s own personal genetics or lineage, though, and it certainly doesn’t belong to Elon.

            Longtermism is a notion coming out of population ethics, that since there will be more people in the future than there are today, that we should take the well-being of all those future people into account when making decisions today.

            This can be taken in lots of different directions — ranging from humanist environmentalism, to space migration, to concern about exotic existential risks.

            But a fixation on one’s own personal DNA is not really related to it at all. That’s more of a misunderstanding of evolutionary biology.

    • DarraignTheSane ( DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s actually all that the “block” function on Lemmy does too - it makes it so that you don’t see any more content from a user, but they can still make comments on your stuff. In other words, Lemmy’s “block” is essentially a “mute” function, too.

      • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 years ago

        lemmy, at least, would have the excuse of being constantly a work in progress and i guess that not having such a large community that hard blocking is necessary. but twitter would be appallingly bad without blocks–it already is with them!

        • Hot Saucerman ( dingus@lemmy.ml ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 years ago

          Also, Lemmy has the bonus of federation allowing instances to defederate entirely from abuse and spam-happy instances. The smaller instances can have more tight-knit communities and defederating from instances full of jerks might be as worthwhile as a “block.”

          • meldroc ( meldroc@lemmy.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            IIRC from reading about Bluesky, its strategy for dealing with spam, trolls, hate speech, etc., was to have various servers in the Federation tag posts, users & servers with a “Spam” tag or “Hate speech” tag, and server admins can set their servers to not display posts so tagged, and to not pass them on to other servers.

      • Derproid ( Derproid@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        I hope it stays this way. It would suck being excluded from unrelated content on Lemmy just because I had a disagreement with someone at some point in the past (depending on how block happy people are of course).