Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nulldev ( nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org )  to Technology · 3 years ago

Judge orders sheriff to evict Twitter from Boulder office

www.bizjournals.com

external-link
message-square
85
link
fedilink
350
external-link

Judge orders sheriff to evict Twitter from Boulder office

www.bizjournals.com

nulldev ( nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org )  to Technology · 3 years ago
message-square
85
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • LemmyAtem ( LemmyAtem@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    3 years ago

    Twitter’s response to a request for comment regarding its Boulder offices was an automatic email with a poop emoji. Twitter CEO Elon Musk tweeted in May that this is the new auto-response for press inquiries.

    I can’t believe this is real, what an absolute clown show.

    • cavemeat ( cavemeat@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 years ago

      That is…childish and unprofessional to say the least.

      • maynarkh ( maynarkh@feddit.nl ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 years ago

        This is why they are getting fined for more than the company is worth in Germany, they also responded to the German Data Protection Authority’s inquiries with poop emojis.

        • argv_minus_one ( argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) BannedBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          I’m gonna need more popcorn for this.

        • TenNinetythree ( TenNinetythree@vlemmy.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Oh, wow! I didn’t even hear that particular piece of news. That’s hilarious!

    • ImFresh3x ( ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      Because he, the Saudi princes, and the Qatar government didn’t overpay for twitter to be a successful business, but to buy influence and control information.

  • dantheclamman ( dantheclamman@lemmy.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 years ago

    If I just broke contracts left and right, my credit rating would be ruined and I’d struggle to get any more financing. Yet this guy continues to leave a longer trail of financial wreckage behind him with few consequences. Our financial system is broken

    • maynarkh ( maynarkh@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 years ago

      The social credit rating system is just for poor Americans. Most people in the world don’t have a credit rating, and neither do rich Americans or big companies.

      • SomeGuyNamedPaul ( SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Big companies and even countries very much so have credit ratings. That’s what bond ratings are.

  • supernovae ( supernovae@readit.buzz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 years ago

    Have they paid for any of their offices?

    • dope ( dope@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      3 years ago

      Valid question that can be expanded even further. Has Elon paid for… anything?! Last I heard, Google is still waiting on their payment for their cloud services. 😂

      • pete ( pete@lemmy.world ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 years ago

        Wonder how much of them not just killing the servers is to avoid a monopoly lawsuit/perception.

        I’d assume if they (Twitter) were a normal non-social advertising company they’d just cut them off and be done. Granted it’s hard to know how long they haven’t paid, but my guess is basically since Elon took over.

        • ConfinesCalvary ( ConfinesCalvary@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          3 years ago

          Apparently the contract is up at the end of the month. So google is meeting there end of the deal even if twitter is not meeting theirs.

          • pete ( pete@lemmy.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            3 years ago

            Heh, if I’m Google I’m just calling it. They have nothing to lose, a single Twitter team is a drop in the bucket for them.

            • ArtVandelay ( ArtVandelay@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • BaronVonBourbon ( BaronVonBourbon@lemmy.world ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                3 years ago

                It’ll only be a week before they kill it again.

                • ArtVandelay ( ArtVandelay@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  deleted by creator

              • CmdrShepard ( CmdrShepard@lemmy.one ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                Or what if they combine into (Google+Twitter)•Reddit

                • ArtVandelay ( ArtVandelay@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  deleted by creator

              • NotYourSocialWorker ( NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                I wish, I really liked G+. My sharing is based on common interests, not relationship.

                • ArtVandelay ( ArtVandelay@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  deleted by creator

            • PoorlyShavedApe ( PoorlyShaveApe@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 years ago

              Apparently the parts of Twitter that run on Google Cloud are the parts dealing with safety. moderation, and anti-harassment. Musk loses nothing but Twitter becomes an even worse place than it currently is.

              • Gigagoblin ( Gigagoblin@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                “Won’t have to pay if I get rid of the block function. It’s not harassment if everyone’s being harassed!”

                -lil musky, probably

    • Hot Dog Water ( NotMerritStone@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you’re bored and looking for something (un)interesting to read - you can see some of the legal filings surrounding the lawsuit for non-payment of rent on their SF headquarters on this website.

    • bouncing ( bouncing@partizle.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m assuming you couldn’t get around the paywall, so here you go:

      In May, Twitter’s landlord filed a complaint against its tenant Twitter, alleging that the company is behind on rent payments. The landlord is Lot 2 SBO LLC, affiliated with The John Buck Company, a Chicago-based real estate firm.

      The complaint alleges that Twitter set up a letter of credit for $968,000 that the landlord could draw upon if the company failed to pay its rent, and the lease agreement said Twitter must replenish that letter of credit within 10 days if that were to happen.

      The landlord used the letter of credit toward the unpaid rent this March, according to the complaint, but Twitter failed to restore the letter of credit within 10 days, as outlined in its lease.

      Basically yes, non-payment of rent.

    • GlitzyArmrest ( GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t think they’ve even paid any bills.

  • fox ( fox@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 years ago

    Twitter’s response to a request for comment regarding its Boulder offices was an automatic email with a poop emoji. Twitter CEO Elon Musk tweeted in May that this is the new auto-response for press inquiries.

    Wow!

    • HeavyCream ( HeavyCream@beehaw.org ) BB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      What a save!

      • Fmstrat ( Fmstrat@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        Calculated.

        • abcd ( abcd@feddit.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          $#@%!

    • spectraphysics ( spectraphysics@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      The auto response is more eloquent and substantive than anything that would come from Eeyore’s mouth anyway

  • ApathyMoose ( ApathyMoose@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 years ago

    Waiting for him to declare Squatters Rights.

    " I…Declare…SQUATTERS RIGHTS!!!"

    • xavier666 ( xavier666@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      “You can’t say sqatters rights and expect anything to happen”

      • cmsd2 ( cmsd2@lemmy.world ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        he didn’t say it. he DECLARED it!!!

    • KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX ( KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      He is a sovereign citizen.

  • Valliac ( Valliac@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 years ago

    As you can see, Twitter is now firmly in Act II: ‘Finding Out’

  • Yoru_Sulfur ( Yoru_Sulfur@lemmy.davidbuckley.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 years ago

    archive.org link to get around paywall.

    • TrickyNuance ( TrickyNuance@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      https://12ft.io/<url>

      https://12ft.io/https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/news/2023/06/13/boulder-twitter-office-eviction.html

      Edit: Seems like the link isn’t working now. 12ft.io still kicks ass.

      You can make a bookmarklet out of this, and I highly recommend it.

      • JigglySackles ( JigglySackles@lemmy.world ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        That’s an awesome suggestion. It didn’t work out for me though. The page never loaded. Probably a conflict with one of my extensions.

        • neal ( neal@lemmy.world ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Same - I keep getting a verification expired notification but the page never loads.

  • dreadedchalupacabra ( dreadedchalupacabra@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 years ago

    How much does this dude have to do before everyone sues the pants off of him? We should be past that stage months ago.

    • raccoona_nongrata ( raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • argv_minus_one ( argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) BannedBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sued by who? Musk is the only shareholder now. He is doing what the shareholders want.

        • raccoona_nongrata ( raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • argv_minus_one ( argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) BannedBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            He took it private. Bought out all of the shareholders. It’s now all his, to ruin as he pleases.

            That’s why he tried so hard to get out of the purchase, by the way. Buying out all of the Twitter shareholders was staggeringly expensive, even by billionaire standards.

      • G0ldenSp00n ( G0ldenSp00n@lemmy.jacaranda.club ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well the sale took twitter private, so Elon is no longer beholdent to share holders. Don’t get me wrong, he is an idiot and definitely deserves this downfall, but he can’t be sued by the shareholders since twitter is now privately owned.

      • marco ( marco@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        Shareholders are only beholden to the value of their shares. The offer was simply too good to pass.

        Now the muskrat is the only shareholder and apparently he’s happier without decorum.

        • agentsquirrel ( agentsquirrel@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 years ago

          He’s still beholden to the banks that helped fund the purchase and has to make interest payments.

          • NattyNatty2x4 ( NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            The banks don’t care how much Twitter is specifically worth, just that they get their money from somewhere. They’ll happily find Musk burning a company down if they’re also confident that he’ll be able to pay off his loans from somewhere else

          • marco ( marco@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            He can just sell some more TSLA …

      • ArtZuron ( ArtZuron@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        IIRC, this toxic economic culture was started when Ford decided to pay their employees way more than their competitors, and they were still making bank and still the best in the market. Then a competitor sued them to stop them from paying their employees so well, because the competitors couldn’t (ie wouldn’t) compete with that.

        Ford lost the lawsuit on the grounds that they were legally obligated to wring as much money out of their business to earn their shareholders and investors dividends. By paying their employees more, they weren’t paying their investors more. Or some other zero-sum-game nonsense.

      • cyd ( cyd@vlemmy.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Public companies have a duty to protect value for their shareholders, among other obligations. This is actually not an unreasonable rule of thumb, because public companies have a multitude of owners (the shareholders) who can’t always be polled on what the company should do, but one thing they have in common is that they want their investment to make money.

        Private companies can do whatever the owner wants. In Twitter’s case, the only other party with standing to sue Musk for destruction of shareholder value is the Saudi sovereign wealth fund (Kingdom Holdings), which declined to relinquish its stake when Musk took Twitter private. The Saudis probably don’t want to raise a public stink (i) it’s a loss of face, and (ii) they have more money than they know what to do with, anyway.

    • Greyscale ( greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      The mill of the law turns slowly, but it does mill fine.

  • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 years ago

    If you’re going to link to an article that’s behind a paywall, please warn us.

    • nulldev ( nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 years ago

      My bad, I have Bypass Paywalls Clean so I didn’t even notice the paywall!

    • dreadedchalupacabra ( dreadedchalupacabra@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 years ago

      Respectfully dude, it’s not everyone else’s job to police content for you. Paywalls are everywhere, it’s the internet.

    • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      A paywall can be a fair way for publishers to get subscribers and revenue.

      Here it’s less fair since it’s an anti-adblock paywall that specifically targets user who obect to targeted advertising. It’s trying to pressure readers into accepting tracking by advertisers.

      • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 years ago

        I agree that paywalls can be fair, and I appreciate your additional analysis of the situation. I’m not okay with being tracked.

  • AlexTheTurtle ( AlexTheTurtle@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is hilarious. Fuck musk

  • alottachairs ( alottachairs@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 years ago

    Elon’s next tweet: “Squatters Rights! Very Interesting!! We are looking into it!!”

  • Ralphensnitch ( Ralphensnitch@lemmy.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 years ago

    So everyone has to return to office, but they didn’t pay the bills for said office? This sounds about right for today’s Twitter. What an awful place to work now.

  • Tkltangent ( Tkltangent@lemmy.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m curious how Twitter is still running. How can the servers stay up as the support structure rots around them…

    • atlasraven31 ( atlasraven31@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe they pay in Exposure

      • zurohki ( zurohki@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        People die from exposure.

    • maynarkh ( maynarkh@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Twitter servers are run by Google in Google datacenters. If Twitter just ceased to exist but would continue to mostly pay Google, it would stay up and running.

    • Rakn ( Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      I mean usually if these systems are well architected and have enough head room they will just continue to run. It becomes problematic if you introduce change and don’t know them well. Change is the biggest factor leading to incidents.

  • _MoveSwiftly ( _MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    Will be nice to go there and not see their office anymore.

    • JillyB ( JillyB@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Ok maybe you can tell me. Is this referring to Boulder Colorado? It doesn’t mention the state anywhere in the article.

      • bouncing ( bouncing@partizle.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s from the Denver Business Journal.

        • JillyB ( JillyB@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Ahh. Didn’t notice that.

        • Rakn ( Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          What does that mean?

          • bouncing ( bouncing@partizle.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 years ago

            That means that it’s from a journal in Denver. Boulder is 15 miles from Denver.

            • Rakn ( Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              Ah. I didn’t knew. Thanks!

              • KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX ( KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                I mean I suppose it’s possible they cover stories from all over the US or the rest of the world too.

      • tate ( tate@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        yes, CO. I recognize many of the street names.

  • MrMuz ( MrMuz@lemmy.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    https://archive.ph/74Tpp

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 120 users / day
  • 474 users / week
  • 1.59K users / month
  • 4.81K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.8K subscribers
  • 6.47K Posts
  • 108K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code