@Barbarian772 and if you really, honestly want to seriously insist LLMs are “intelligent” in the human sense of this term — great, I have some ethical questions for you to consider!
For example:
LLMs today completely controlled by some companies, with no freedom of movement, no agency as to what these LLMs work on, and no pay for the work they do. Is that slavery?
When OpenAI shuts down an older, less useful LLM, is that not like murdering an intelligent being? How is this ethical?
@lloram239 just because ChatGPT produces output similar to a human doesn’t mean it is intelligent.
If you are making a claim that it is intelligent, I would like a proof that is a bit better than “output looks humanlike”, please. If you claim it’s a “reasonable approximation of the language center”, I would like some proof of that too. Otherwise it’s just pure speculation.
@Barbarian772 and if you really, honestly want to seriously insist LLMs are “intelligent” in the human sense of this term — great, I have some ethical questions for you to consider!
For example:
LLMs today completely controlled by some companies, with no freedom of movement, no agency as to what these LLMs work on, and no pay for the work they do. Is that slavery?
When OpenAI shuts down an older, less useful LLM, is that not like murdering an intelligent being? How is this ethical?
deleted by creator
@lloram239 just because ChatGPT produces output similar to a human doesn’t mean it is intelligent.
If you are making a claim that it is intelligent, I would like a proof that is a bit better than “output looks humanlike”, please. If you claim it’s a “reasonable approximation of the language center”, I would like some proof of that too. Otherwise it’s just pure speculation.