If you oppose this, don’t just comment and complain, contact your antitrust authority today:
US:
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/report-antitrust-violation
EU:
https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/contact_en
comp-greffe-antitrust@ec.europa.eu
UK:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tell-the-cma-about-a-competition-or-market-problem
France:
https://signal.conso.gouv.fr/fr/tel-internet-media/faire-un-signalement
Germany: @kartellamt@social.bund.de (anti-cartel bureau) of @BMWK https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Kartellverbot/Anonyme_Hinweise/anonymehinweise_node.html https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Missbrauchsaufsicht/missbrauchsaufsicht_node.html
Philippines:
https://www.phcc.gov.ph/file-a-complaint/
India:
https://www.cci.gov.in/antitrust/
https://www.cci.gov.in/filing/atd
Canada:
https://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/frm-eng/GHÉT-7TDNA5
- TwoGems ( @TwoGems@lemmy.ml ) 7•1 year ago
Thanks!
- Kevin Karhan :verified: ( @kkarhan@mstdn.social ) 3•1 year ago
@vriska1 for Germany: @kartellamt@social.bund.de (anti-cartel bureau) of @BMWK
https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Kartellverbot/Anonyme_Hinweise/anonymehinweise_node.html
https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Missbrauchsaufsicht/missbrauchsaufsicht_node.htmlThanks I will add that to my future comments!
- IverCoder ( @IverCoder@lemm.ee ) English2•1 year ago
Added
- setVeryLoud(true); ( @isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca ) 1•1 year ago
I got a 400 bad request for the CA link
Works fine for me?
- setVeryLoud(true); ( @isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca ) 1•1 year ago
- Engywuck ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) 9•1 year ago
Oh, look. It’s only been posted a thousand times this week…
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 7•1 year ago
I want an internet without Google.
- yum13241 ( @yum13241@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
It’s DRM for the internet. The open web is fucking dead.
In loving memory, RIP TCP/IP based internet 1973 - 2023 Rest In Peace. We missed you.
- kilgore ( @kilgore@feddit.de ) 1•1 year ago
Is there any way to block or spoof the collection oftheis data?
- conciselyverbose ( @conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
Not if they force you to get your shit signed by Google to connect to a site.
- Azzy ( @AzzyDev@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
Not even with containers (in a similar way to how Firefox already handles DRM?)
- conciselyverbose ( @conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
If Google gets their way, either Google* authenticates you or you’re SOL.
*they’re selling it as others can too, but it will be super limited. If Firefox supported it it would only be for their build and sites would likely only validate them if you were restricted on extensions.
- Azzy ( @AzzyDev@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
…fuck. I’ve been having this idea where sites could perhaps be loaded in the background with the drm in a container, with the content being displayed for the user, with this front end content being modifiable by extensions and such. So if a button needed JavaScript, the JavaScript would be ran in the DRM container and the content would be added to the user’s view.