Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
circularfish ( circularfish@beehaw.org ) M to Politics ·
edit-2
3 years ago

Musk's X sues nonprofit that fights hate-speech

www.reuters.com

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
226
external-link

Musk's X sues nonprofit that fights hate-speech

www.reuters.com

circularfish ( circularfish@beehaw.org ) M to Politics ·
edit-2
3 years ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
Social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, on Monday sued a nonprofit that fights hate speech and disinformation, accusing it of asserting false claims and encouraging advertisers to pause investment on the platform.

The ‘free speech absolutist’ gleefully promoting anti-vaccine misinformation is now suing a hate speech watchdog for “using flawed methodologies to advance incorrect, misleading narratives."

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 years ago

    We need laws against business owners that frivolously run their business into the ground and damage others’ without retaining any liability beyond the business’ death.

    • ImplyingImplications ( ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 years ago

      Isn’t he being sued by Tesla shareholders for literally that?

      • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        They have a civil suit against him, but that kind of lawsuit is almost never successful (edit: at pinning liability onto the business owner - I’m saying liability will probably only fall to Twitter and not Musk personally /edit). Twitter is still a limited liability company, and now that it is privately owned its owners are free to run it into the ground - they don’t have an obligation to shareholders.

        Private businesses should be free to do this, but this was a publicly traded company turned private, so arguably there should be solid protections in law that make this wrong rather than the only option being a difficult civil lawsuit.

        • Dankenstein ( Dankenstein@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

        • PersnickityPenguin ( PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          But Tesla isn’t a private business. It’s a public business that’s traded on the stock exchange. That’s a huge difference from the bird site.

          • tintory ( tintory@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Don’t forget both Tesla and SpaceX ( who are heavily subsided by the American government also) employees was taken from their jobs and working on making more of a mess of Twitter

        • jmcs ( jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Private companies shouldn’t be able to do that because it still has a negative impact on society. When a company implodes there are employees that have their lives ruined, suppliers that will now have problems of their own, which will lead to more lives ruined.

          This view that if you aren’t a shareholder you aren’t an important stakeholder in a company is incredibly damaging to the social fabric.

    • Belgdore ( Belgdore@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      We have it, it’s called “Piercing the corporate veil.” Twitter being a California company should make it easier.

    • Dankenstein ( Dankenstein@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • underisk ( underisk@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        OP suggests we add legal protections against what Musk is doing and your response is to point out that he’s not doing anything illegal. Thanks man, wise words.

        • Dankenstein ( Dankenstein@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

  • Storksforlegs ( storksforlegs@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 years ago

    Sueing anti-hate groups will really bring in the advertisers! Another genius move.

    Hopefully it’ll get thrown out, seems pretty meritless.

  • megopie ( megopie@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    “Their doing hate speech against me! Ironic is it not?”

    “Mr. musk, telling you that you’re doing a bad job of managing moderation is not hate speech”

    “ WELL I HATED IT!”

  • Introversion ( Introversion@readit.buzz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    CCDH would love for this lawsuit to happen. Discovery would not be favorable to the dead bird site.

    https://counterhate.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Letter-to-A.-Spiro-from-R.-Kaplan-re-CCDH.pdf

    • 98codes ( 98codes@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Now with a clickable link

      • jossbo ( jossbo@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        I never thought a legal letter would be entertaining to read, but that was.

  • No_Eponym ( No_Eponym@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    X gonna give it to ya!

    • Bonesince1997 ( Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      WHAT!

Politics

politics

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Socialism

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 5 users / day
  • 108 users / week
  • 428 users / month
  • 1.63K users / 6 months
  • 2.4K local subscribers
  • 11.6K subscribers
  • 4.11K Posts
  • 22.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • Gaywallet (they/it) ( Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
  • JuBe ( JuBe@beehaw.org ) 
  • JCPhoenix ( JCPhoenix@beehaw.org ) 
  • Gil (he/they) ( kalanggam@beehaw.org ) 
  • circularfish ( circularfish@beehaw.org ) 
  • knokelmaat ( knokelmaat@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code