- BurnTheRight ( @BurnTheRight@kbin.social ) 66•1 year ago
Conservatism is a global plague of deception, oppression and death. It always has been.
- Snowpix ( @Snowpix@yiffit.net ) 40•1 year ago
Who downvoted this? Conservatism has always been an ideology that’s opposed to progress, democracy and freedom. It holds back society to preserve tradition and “family values” while promoting xenophobia, bigotry, and unquestioned submission to authority. The most conservative states in the United States are also some of the poorest, with the lowest standards of living, and also the most backwards. It isn’t much different in other countries. The Nazis were conservative. Islamic countries with Sharia Law are conservative. And right now, American Conservatives are trying to implement a Christian-flavoured Sharia Law.
- 5 Card Draw ( @RedCanasta@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 9•1 year ago
ConservatismCapitalism has always been an ideology that’s opposed to progress, democracy and freedom.There you go, I fixed that for you.
All political entities serve the needs of capital first and foremost in a capitalist system, people are only a secondary…if that.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 16•1 year ago
Speaking as a Marxist, this is false. Capitalism was once the historical progressive force against feudalism. This was already waning two centuries ago, but it was not always true.
- argv_minus_one ( @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year ago
And now it’s rapidly turning back into feudalism, while the masses clap and cheer.
- Auli ( @Auli@lemmy.ca ) 0•1 year ago
Sure but did capitlism really defeat feudalism? Seems like the other side of the same coin.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Yes, it did, though vestiges still remain. That’s what the French Revolution overwhelmingly was, the bourgeoisie claiming power over the old feudal nobility and the monarchy (as anything but a figurehead). Also the American revolution and many others.
They resemble each other because they are in all cases the “owning class” claiming the seat as the “ruling class”, just as the slaveholders of classical antiquity and the patriarchs of pre-historical agrarian/pastoral societies.
It’s kind of a tangent, but in explaining the concept of equality, Lenin discusses some of the differences between feudalism and liberal capitalism in a letter here.
There are places such as Thailand and Bhutan where the struggle is still alive between the two modes of production, but those are the very rare exceptions to the global order of liberal capitalism (in various forms) vs whatever you want to call the theocratic capitalism of Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. vs the state socialism of the PRC, Cuba, etc.
- cyd ( @cyd@vlemmy.net ) 6•1 year ago
This isn’t true, though; politics is in the driver’s seat, and capital is at the mercy of government. We can see this even in the US where the Biden administration is pushing decoupling/deglobalization for geopolitical and domestic reasons, to the discomfort of US-based multinationals. On the other side of the aisle, the business-friendly cosmopolitan arm of the Republican party has lost ground to the Trumpian populist wing. You see a similar story elsewhere in the world. In the case of Russia, a lot of people thought that Putin was a tool of the oligarchs, so you can change his behavior by putting pressure on the oligarchs. Surprise, it turned out that the oligarchs have to do what Putin tells them, not the other way round.
- 5 Card Draw ( @RedCanasta@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 5•1 year ago
I’m not really sure what you’re trying to say, are the democrats not friendly with ANY big businesses? Is the extreme right wing of US conservatives not motivated by money (Donald Trump is often thought of as a successful venture capitalist, the amount of money funneled out during his presidency, etc…)?
Russia is one of the most inequal countries in the world in terms of wealth distribution, and for decades now oligarchs in Russia have gone hand in hand with the state in eroding any form of democracy and exploiting what freedom those citizens do have.
So, can you really say democracy can exist with money?
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
This is ridiculous. “Politics” cannot be in the driver’s seat because “politics” is not an entity. Domestic capital legally falls under the jurisdiction of the government, but that does not mean that it is actually at the mercy of the government. Capital since before the country was even founded has owned the vast majority of politicians and dictated the way that the government is organized and the laws it passes. That’s why people without land couldn’t even vote at first and why we still retain a senate, which is 100% just a body for checking the power of people who do not own land versus those who own a lot of land.
- threeduck ( @threeduck@aussie.zone ) 3•1 year ago
Genuine question re: US conservative states, what came first, poverty or conservativism? As in, what caused the other? If not a little of column A and B…
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 6•1 year ago
That’s an easy one, conservatism came first because it preceded the founding of the US and was championed by many in the Continental Congress.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
There are a lot of conservatives here thanks to Reddit. Tankie hysteria allows them to speak in parallel to the radlibs and anarcho-bidenists without too much dispute, so they have blended in. Funny how that works.
- argv_minus_one ( @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) 4•1 year ago
What in the world is an anarcho-bidenist?
- Nyefan ( @Nyefan@lemmy.ml ) 3•1 year ago
God, I’m far too online.
It’s Vaush shit.
Vaush claims the anarchist label (in contravention of any evidence that he practices anarchist principals in his daily life), he simped hard for Biden during the 2020 election, and disingenuous Marxists use that as a box to stick practicing anarchists in.
- algorithmae ( @algorithmae@lemmy.one ) 1•1 year ago
I swear people are just making shit up to get mad at nowadays
- BeatNik ( @BeatNik@kbin.social ) 41•1 year ago
Isn’t democracy collapsing everywhere? The USA’s electoral voting system means democracy doesn’t exist. A vote in California is worth 27% of a vote in Wyoming in terms of representation. Add on blatant gerrymandering and you’ve got a rigged system.
The UK has introduced voter ID laws for a problem that never existed in the past. The UK has also had multiple unelected prime ministers due to the way that the parliamentary system works.
Democracy is on the wane everywhere.
- curiosityLynx ( @curiosityLynx@kbin.social ) 13•1 year ago
Haven’t seen any indication of it being in danger in Switzerland. But we have proportional voting rather than first past the post and referenda are common.
- Nighthawk ( @Nighthawk@kbin.social ) 15•1 year ago
I was going to say this. The older democratic systems (easily identified by 1st-past-the-post) are falling apart at the seams, but the rest of us is (relatively) fine. Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.
- curiosityLynx ( @curiosityLynx@kbin.social ) 5•1 year ago
Switzerland’s isn’t so young either. It dates back to Napoleonic times.
- SubArcticTundra ( @SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Would France classify as an older system since they have a non-proportional 2-round system?
- pingveno ( @pingveno@lemmy.ml ) English1•1 year ago
Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.
Fortunately with the US, its decentralized system allows experimentation at the state and local level. My city (Portland, OR) just switched to ranked choice voting for city council along with a host of other changes. Voters statewide will soon be able to vote on using RCV for state races. Meanwhile, ranked choice has been implemented in several other states and localities across the country. It will take a while, but I think ranked choice will become the norm within a few decades.
- Detry ( @Detry@kbin.social ) 12•1 year ago
Yep, elections in the US are neither free nor fair.
- jalda ( @jalda@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
I’m not really familiar with the problem of voter ID laws in the UK. Here (Spain) showing your ID is mandatory to vote, and nobody think that’s a problem (but we need ID for basically any paperwork, so it isn’t an additional burden). Afaik, the problem in the USA is that it is quite difficult to get an ID card, and intentionally so for certain demographics. Is it the same in the UK?
- janeshep ( @janeshep@feddit.it ) 7•1 year ago
The UK has also had multiple unelected prime ministers due to the way that the parliamentary system works.
That’s… not any indicator democracy is “on the wane”. In most Western European countries we don’t directly vote for the one man/woman, we vote for MPs because the legislative power is in the hands of the Parliament. As long as the Parliament is made of elected MPs then democracy is working just fine.
- Auli ( @Auli@lemmy.ca ) 1•1 year ago
Sure on paper but reality is people vote for the leader of the party.
- pingveno ( @pingveno@lemmy.ml ) English6•1 year ago
The US’s system is unbalanced and unfair, but it’s far from “doesn’t exist”. And while you have listed a pair of blue/red state pairs, look at the 2nd and next to last state and you see a red/blue state pair. So it’s unfair, but it’s not uniformly unfair.
- Jaximus ( @Jaximus@lemmy.ml ) 26•1 year ago
Well it is Bourgeois democracy that’s slowly been consumed by corporate power. Globally
- CAPSLOCKFTW ( @CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml ) 19•1 year ago
Thought this would be about the US
- fomo_erotic ( @fomo_erotic@lemmy.ml ) 7•1 year ago
“Oh no. Thats disgusting. Which one? There are like… sooo many.”
It’s foreshadowing
- Lemuria ( @lemuria@lemmy.ml ) 18•1 year ago
can you even call it a democracy anymore?
- kunday ( @kunday@lemmy.ml ) 12•1 year ago
Of course not. India used to be secular. the far right Hindu extremism is taking over. Also it’s so good to be able to post this and not be trolled by pro Modi trolls. The amount of concentration of power due to lack of alternatives is so scary.
PS: I’m an Indian who now lives in Australia.
- kunday ( @kunday@lemmy.ml ) 3•1 year ago
Just to clarify, the lack of alternatives creates a vaccine creating an almost defacto win for Modi et all. that’s the part of democracy collapsing
- reddit_sux ( @reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi ) 6•1 year ago
Yes it is still a democracy, maybe a democrazy. There are no widespread voter suppression, disenfranchisement.
The most recent election has shown that.
There are some pockets of election tampering, violence but nowhere widespread.
- notenoughbutter ( @notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
MODIcracy
- nestEggParrot ( @nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org ) 2•1 year ago
What makes it not a democracy ?
a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation (“direct democracy”), or to choose governing officials to do so (“representative democracy”).
Going by wikipedia, India fits in as a representative democracy. None of the elections are contested despite widespread corruptions. Its pretty much assumed all major parties do so and thus in a level field.
Where most have issue is:
Features of democracy often include freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of religion and speech, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.
India has some level of trouble with almost all of those. Both in past as well as some ongoing.
A large part of the reason is all available government choices are shitty in some sense or other. Modi is bad but so was their opposition. India didn’t start having these issues magically the day modi came to power. In that sense many blaming him ignore how deep rooted these problamatic views are in general soceity (at least in some areas and communities).
My point is that the many issues pointed here stems from a deeper problem and exists despite India being a democracy not because it isn’t. Infact if it was nearly as authoritarian as many claim, it would have plunged into greater chaos.
- biscuitsofdeath ( @biscuitsofdeath@lemmy.ml ) 16•1 year ago
an Indian version of fascism.
Lol, what? Isn’t fascism the same across the globe?
- szczur ( @szczur@lemmy.ml ) 8•1 year ago
Not really, it always adapts to local needs and shares the same oppressive memes, sometimes taking some and leaving some behind.
- radicalpikachu ( @radicalpikachu@vlemmy.net ) 15•1 year ago
Reminder that Reddit still hosts the largest hatful subreddit that is r/IndiaSpeaks and nothing ever happens to it.
The content in the sub ranges from Islamophobia, death threats, misogyny and homophobia.
- makingStuffForFun ( @makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
You obviously haven’t been to /r/sino then. The most racist place on the internet. Reddit is aware of it and do nothing. I wonder why.
- Takatakatakatakatak ( @bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 12•1 year ago
You want to know what’s truly disturbing? The previous Australian Federal government did many of these same things too, or worse.
It seems true democracy has fallen out of favour.
- Silviecat44 ( @Silviecat44@vlemmy.net ) 4•1 year ago
I can’t believe no one noticed Scomo making himself minister of 5 areas
- withersailor ( @withersailor@aussie.zone ) 2•1 year ago
It it all got swept under the rug.
- szczur ( @szczur@lemmy.ml ) 11•1 year ago
I don’t really feel representative democracy falls into a category of democracy anymore.
- AndyGHK ( @AndyGHK@lemmy.zip ) 9•1 year ago
In our modern age, it really doesn’t. We have the infrastructure to make direct democracy possible, we just lack the political will to take responsibility for our communities and vote and be informed as much as that would require. As humans, not as a nation in particular.
- Corvidae ( @Skyrmir@discuss.tchncs.de ) 5•1 year ago
We have the technology, but not the social skills. Most of America doesn’t know their next door neighbors, let alone their community. We have a lot of steps to go before direct democracy is the best solution.
- cyd ( @cyd@vlemmy.net ) 4•1 year ago
International commentators can’t seem to wrap their minds around the idea that Modi’s BJP is having so much success because Indians, on the whole, like them and think they’re doing a pretty good job.
Americans in particular tend to think that if you don’t have two equally strong parties duking it out over 50/50 nailbiter elections, it’s not democracy. But plenty of postwar and postcolonial democracies end up with dominant parties, without falling into dictatorship. In Japan, for example, the LDP has held power for something like 95% of the time since WWII, and it’s a pretty healthy democracy.
- LibertyLizard ( @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ) 6•1 year ago
Dictators can also be popular, but that doesn’t make their systems of government democratic. I would suggest you read the article if you haven’t because it discusses both Modi’s popularity and the specific actions he has taken that undermine Indian democracy.
- flatbield ( @furrowsofar@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
I am live in the US. No I do not think that. I think a system that has only 2 parties in not that big an improvement over 1 party. What I would like to see is IRV so many parties can be viable. Frankly it would be good to look more at a proportional representation system, but I do not think that fits into the US structure very well. Sane districts so representation is kind of proportional is at least better then nothing.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 3•1 year ago
Says “World’s largest democracy” but it’s not about the PRC? India, unlike China, actually has something resembling pogroms against Muslims.
- nadir ( @nadir@lemmy.ml ) 11•1 year ago
Because the PRC is not a democracy?
- Corvidae ( @Skyrmir@discuss.tchncs.de ) 3•1 year ago
PRC has fewer people, regardless of it’s political structure.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
PRC still has very slightly more, as far as I can tell. About 20 million more, 1.40something billion vs 1.42something billion.
- Elindio ( @Elindio@lemmy.sdf.org ) 0•1 year ago
You’re doing a good job of being wrong about everything - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/24/india-overtakes-china-to-become-worlds-most-populous-country#:~:text=According to the UN’s projections,China for the first time.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Who gave you the opinion that the PRC is less of a democracy than India?
- nadir ( @nadir@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Who gave you the impression that the PRC is a democracy at all?
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
Now now, I asked you first ;)
But I would say that it was mainly the Chinese people who gave me that impression with their consistent and overwhelming approval of their government, and their majority view that it is indeed democratic. I know that any such heterodox claims will be dismissed out of hand, but I’ll still give you a shot.
- nadir ( @nadir@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
I get that you’re an advocate of authoritan one party rulership and you’re free to call that democracy.
I’m not exactly a fan of liberal democracy but I value systems where the citizens have a high degree of influence on who governs them, the ability to freely create opposition parties and where state censorship and suppression are not openly advocated.
I’d be really happy if there was a living, successful alternative to the western style liberal democracies. Leninism or the particular capitalist system China has developed don’t seem very attractive to me.
- GarbageShootAlt2 ( @GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
You’re just operating on inherited opinions from western propaganda: https://www.newsweek.com/most-china-call-their-nation-democracy-most-us-say-america-isnt-1711176
The dictatorship of the bourgeoisie seen in America and elsewhere is a genuine dictatorship, where speech is only free so long as it is meaningless and has no reach. In reality, speech is controlled by corporations and billionaires who publish what they want published and censor on their platforms unilaterally. The fact that it’s corporations and not the government doing this is a distinction without a difference when these same corporations work with each other and control the government through lobbying, “consultant” positions, 6-figure “speaking fees”, etc.
- nadir ( @nadir@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
You can always say that the respective other site is “just” operating on propaganda based opinions.
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make by saying that people in China believe to be living in a democracy. So do the people living in liberal democracies, a system you yourself describe as a dictatorship. All that you’re proving is that people can be mistaken. Not which people - if any - actually are.
Without a clear definition of what one means by “democracy” it’s a pretty useless argument.
If you include freedom of assembly, free speech, a free press, free and secret elections and the other commonly valued parts of a western style democracy there’s really no question that China doesn’t even come close to qualifying.
The people in power in the West love the power the PRC has and do their best eroding the little power people here have to implement similar levels of surveillance and control where they don’t already exist.
I see only losers in this kind of competition.