Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.
Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English305•1 year ago
Fuck ALL advertisements. Yes, even “unobtrusive” ones, especially yours. If I want your shit, I will find you. If I appreciate your shit, I’ll pay you for your time. If you want to connect, I’m all ears. Otherwise, fuck off capitalists, fuck off advertisers, and fuck off useful idiots who want to waste my finite lifespan in this miserable universe showing me ads.
- Granixo ( @Granixo@feddit.cl ) 123•1 year ago
I literally just came from another post that was talking about this.
- e_mc2 ( @e_mc2@feddit.nl ) 7•1 year ago
Basically what happened to the Internet as a whole.
- Shdwdrgn ( @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz ) English42•1 year ago
Unfortunately there’s a lot of products that most people don’t even know exist. Hell I keep finding new tools and wondering why I’ve been doing things the hard way for so long.
OTOH, fuck all the advertisers who use shady tactics to make sales, and especially fuck all the people who pray on the naivety of others to steal their money. I was just showing a customer an email I got the other day stating her domain hosting was past due and required immediate payment, and she asked how I knew it was a scam. Uh, hello, because —I— am hosting your domain and website (and this is exactly why I share this kind of stuff with people, to make them think before they blindly write a check).
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English14•1 year ago
Unfortunately there’s a lot of products that most people don’t even know exist. Hell I keep finding new tools and wondering why I’ve been doing things the hard way for so long.
For sure. I’m not against promotion in the large, but the constant and intrusive advertisements within other tasks, such as web ads that take up valuable screen real estate, or TV/YouTube commercials that keep me from the programs I want to watch.
Like my username is literally PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S. I have no problem getting PM’ed or emailed stuff. For example, I’m subscribed to a number of mailing lists from sites I ordered from. Guitar Center can send me all the emails they want [1], sell me all the crap they want, because I can opt out at any time, and I have a work email so I can put them aside for later.
[1] To the specific email I gave them, which I do check.
- Landrin201 ( @Landrin201@lemmy.ml ) English10•1 year ago
I would argue that if there’s a product that nobody knows exist that’s not necessarily because we need to allow constant intrusive ads, and more indicative that people don’t actually need the product.
I want to say that in any given day, 60% of the ads I see are from big, well known companies who don’t need me to see them to know they exist. Shit like Liberty Mutual (I swear I see more of their ads than anyone else and THEY ARE ALREADY MY INSURANCE PROVIDER), Coke, Pepsi, etc. 39.9% of the remaining 40% are advertisements for shit that I just don’t care about. I don’t care about the newest tech toys. I don’t care about the newest car mods, or random shit I can put on my desk, or stupid extra kitchen gadgets. Fully 40% of the ads I see are trying to convince me that I should buy a product that I straight up don’t need because the ad looked cool. Why should those ads be allowed to exist? Why should I be constantly bombarded with ads for services that I either already know plenty about or for things that are trying to manufacture a reason for their existence?
Only about 0.5% of the ads I see are actually for things I did know know about and that seem useful to me, or like something I would like. Probably even less than that, I’m drunk rn and estimating.
- Shdwdrgn ( @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz ) English8•1 year ago
I keep throwing away ads from Comcast trying to sell me on the virtues of their business internet packages. Guys, I left you because your lame-ass shit was expensive as hell, slow as hell, and you couldn’t even be counted on to meet a single appointment in 6 months to bury your damn line you left laying across my yard.
I agree with you, there’s a lot of companies that just need to be silenced. You’re allowed to send me ONE ad, and you better make it good because I don’t ever want to hear from you again.
- Catsrules ( @Catsrules@lemmy.ml ) 17•1 year ago
I hate ads as much as the next guy, but without ads get ready to start paying for things. You go to a news website, sorry you need to login and hand over your credit card to access anything. Youtube? Sorry you need to login and pay up to watch anything. You want to Google,Bing, Duckduckgo something sorry you better pay up can’t sell you data to advertisers anymore.
Not saying this is necessarily a bad thing but it will fundamentally change how the internet works and it potentially could limit informational access to poor people.
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English11•1 year ago
I brought this up the last time I talked about this, but to be clear, if we must choose between advertisements and paywall, then we should choose advertisements as the lesser evil. However, we must never accept the fallacy that advertising or paywalls are the only possible choices! More generally, we must never accept the fallacy that a market is the only acceptable way to distribute goods, a corollary of which is the idea that any acceptable solution needs to compete on equal terms with existing products in a market.
Not saying this is necessarily a bad thing but it will fundamentally change how the internet works and it potentially could limit informational access to poor people.
Well the first part at least would be a welcome change. The issue in my view is the very fact that poor people are treated as second-class citizens in information access or any other field of endeavor.
Youtube? Sorry you need to login and pay up to watch anything. You want to Google,Bing, Duckduckgo something sorry you better pay up can’t sell you data to advertisers anymore.
I very genuinely want those sites to fucking die so I don’t have to coexist in a world where they dominate the internet. I would be literally thrilled to join a group of like-minded people who have to reimplement the conveniences of the modern web from scratch for free.
- Catsrules ( @Catsrules@lemmy.ml ) 7•1 year ago
Still end of the day the server bill has got to be paid.
- blackbrook ( @blackbrook@mander.xyz ) 3•1 year ago
Why on earth is a paywall an evil and worse than ads? This idea that everything on the Internet needs to be free-as-in-beer is the toxicity that has resulted in our entire world corrupted with ads. A News organization needs money to pay journalists and to send them to where news is happening. A video service like YouTube needs to pay for massive amounts of storage and servers. If you want quality professional content, and not just fake blogging thinny disguising advertising, you need to pay writers.
The alternative is that is it all corrupted with ads, or by the “rich uncle” of the day like a musk or a zuckerberg or whatever with an ulterior motive.
If you want the provider of a service or product to be beholden and at all responsive to you, as a user, rather than someone else, you need to be a customer, a paying customer. That’s your only real leverage. If someone else is the real source of their revenue stream then their every act is geared to please them and not you. That’s what we have now.
Is you want to socialize it all instead, like a PBS, I’m fine with that but good luck.
- simple ( @simple@lemm.ee ) English15•1 year ago
If I want your shit, I will find you. If I appreciate your shit, I’ll pay you for your time.
This literally won’t happen because you will never find my content without ads.
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English14•1 year ago
… what’s your content? If you’re not comfortable posting it, them what type of media is it? Not to rub it in, but getting your content from you, your fans, or someone who contacts me currently is the only way I will ever get your content, as I ruthlessly block advertising in every aspect of my life.
To be clear, I’m not against self promotion. For example, if you went into a video game forum and posted links to your game, that’s not advertising in my view. More importantly, I would probably actually be interested in a new video game by you if I were browsing a video game forum. Hell, if you randomly PM’ed it to me or emailed it, that would be fine too.
- simple ( @simple@lemm.ee ) English16•1 year ago
I make games and stuff. Let me tell you, it’s pretty hard to get noticed on the internet. There comes a point where whatever you’re selling will be popular enough in a closed circle that it spreads through word of mouth but before that you need to get an audience. That means some shameless advertising in social media and maybe buying some ad spaces. If you don’t get that momentum whatever content you’re making might be dead on arrival. A lot of people and companies making ads don’t actually like annoying others with them, but it’s really hard to get anyone’s attention now that there’s like a billion new things releasing every day.
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English2•1 year ago
That means some shameless advertising in social media and maybe buying some ad spaces.
I’d have no problem if you just spammed my inbox or all of my communities. I’m all for self-promotion or even just promoting stuff you like. I don’t get adverts anymore, but there have been so many times where I got a negative impression of something I later found out was cool because it was advertised to me first.
I have no problem with people being annoying in my inbox or trying to promote themselves. What I do have a problem with is the constant stream of undiluted, intrusive bullshit being sold to me since the day I was born. If I saw your game in a web ad that’s keeping me from the content I actually wanted to see, I would absolutely not be interested in it; if you or a fan blindly spammed it into my inbox 69 times in a row, I would definitely check it out.
- Tutunkommon ( @Tutunkommon@beehaw.org ) English3•1 year ago
The Priestess, the Protector https://a.co/d/3ulrVuk
- STUPIDVIPGUY ( @STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz ) 6•1 year ago
Independent repair/handyman business pays google to place ads in their results when you search for relevant terms. In the past this was done through flyers & newspapers & billboards and such. If the business made absolutely no effort to advertise their service, then you would never be able to find them when you’re looking for that service, except for through word of mouth (which is arguably a form of advertising in itself.)
Don’t get me wrong, I hate ads too, and they’ve become far too prevalent in popular media. But they exist for a reason.
Edit: we also should have the right to block and deny ads as we wish. And at the same time, advertisers should have the right to exist. Google’s recent DRM and crackdown on adblockers should be met with forceful government intervention, in an ideal world, due to their debatable monopoly over their sector.
- Gargleblaster ( @Gargleblaster@kbin.social ) 4•1 year ago
Business directories
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 12•1 year ago
Marketing is only manipulation. It wants to manipulate me into doing something I otherwise wouldn’t have.
Since I don’t know how well their manipulation works, my only option is to only buy things that I have never seen an ad for.
To make sure I can still buy anything at all, I block/avoid ads where I can.
- biddy ( @biddy@feddit.nl ) 1•1 year ago
Since I don’t know how well their manipulation works
I do. It works really fucking well. $900 billion per year well.
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 1•1 year ago
But that’s their manipulation towards their employers. These numbers rely on people who lie and manipulate for a living to tell honest numbers about their own worth.
- Today ( @Today@lemm.ee ) 10•1 year ago
I went to Cuba and i leaned that not all advertisements are capitalist.
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English7•1 year ago
I’d still rather not have them. Interesting point though.
- Blackmist ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) English3•1 year ago
I remember growing up in the 80s and we’d have adverts for milk and eggs. Not any brand or company. Just a general message to drink milk and eat eggs. Think it was like a farmers union thing.
Most people here will only know who Accrington Stanley are because of those ads.
- Today ( @Today@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
Yeah, from the beef council. Also, “The more you know…” Those were kind of like advertisements. I tried to post pics of some Cuban billboards but this app wouldn’t do it. I’ll try again. They basically blame everything on the US embargo.
- Nonameuser678 ( @Nonameuser678@aussie.zone ) 3•1 year ago
Are there people who genuinely enjoy ads?
- Parsnip8904 ( @Parsnip8904@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year ago
I didn’t mind ads on TV as they were pretty entertaining until it became the same ten ads played in a loop over the day. Pretty much put me off watching cable forever.
- PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him] ( @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ) English2•1 year ago
Are there a nontrivial number of people who genuinely enjoy ads?
Maybe? My parents are boomers and they watch cable TV with ads. I’ve told them a few dozen times that they don’t need to watch them, that they could mute them or watch elsewhere, but they don’t care. My grandmother also watches the ads when she watches TV. Oh well…
- zer0nix ( @zer0nix@lemm.ee ) 3•1 year ago
I’m upvoting because this should actually be unpopular. Intrusive ads are bad but less intrusive ones let you know who the patrons are of the otherwise highly expensive services you enjoy. That all of this gets paid for with ad money is nothing less than a miracle.
If you don’t want to see ads then don’t give them your notice! I like being informed when new products go to market.
- Aabbcc ( @Aabbcc@lemm.ee ) 6•1 year ago
I like being informed when new products go to market.
This should be an opt in service
- Luke ( @lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
Yep, like if you want to know about new phones coming out or whatever other topic of interest, subscribe to one of the myriad magazine websites that obsess over that kind of thing. Ads for that stuff showing up everywhere including our damn physical mailbox is a public nuisance, and a waste of resources.
- Jimbo ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 1•1 year ago
I think I’ve found maybe two things through ads that I probably wouldn’t have found on my own and actually wanted
So not worth it lmao
- ReallyKinda ( @ReallyKinda@kbin.social ) 204•1 year ago
The average person shouldn’t be allowed to drive. It’s extremely dangerous and most people are desensitized to it and absolutely don’t take the natural responsibility towards others that comes with having the ability to kill someone with a finger twitch (or a slight lapse in attention) seriously enough. I don’t think it would be allowed if it was just invented this year.
- Synthead ( @Synthead@lemmy.ml ) 41•1 year ago
Too many places let you drive if you do the happy path stuff right: stopping at a stop sign, changing lanes safely, etc. But the most important time of your driving is when you’re about to hit a semitruck and you need to get your car out of the way, and there is no training material for this at all. People often panic and slam the brakes and aggressively turn the wheel, which is a perfect setup for understeer and losing control of your car. They are literally getting in a situation where they are about to die and they choose to greatly increase their risk due to negligence.
It’s cheaper to run simulators than purchase cars and hire trainers. Get em in nasty situations and teach them how to get out of it. For real, if mom and dad can’t evade sinking their freeway missile into a van full of kids, they shouldn’t be able to get behind the wheel and be presented with opportunities where this might happen any time they drive.
- TheBurlapBandit ( @TheBurlapBandit@beehaw.org ) 27•1 year ago
…in this essay I will explain how my 500 hours in Burnout: Paradise makes me a superior driver…
- Jimbo ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 4•1 year ago
You say that, but I’m fully convinced a good rally simulator will help a looot to control a car in adverse conditions
But I could be totally wrong, I do do a lot of real life and sim driving
- datavoid ( @datavoid@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
Someone’s been playing grand theft auto
In a sense, I agree that it makes sense to train people to be better technical drivers. The issue is that for avoiding accidents, your time is orders of magnitude better spent practicing planning and avoiding potential situations in the first place.
Being able to see where you need to pay extra attention, what cars to keep extra distance to, and being able to judge what a safe speed is saves far more lives than building the technical skills to get out of a situation once you’re in it.
To be fair though: at least in Norway we have an obligatory course where we drive on sleet/ice or oil to practice controlling a car in winter conditions. However, the main focus of the course is on recognising how fast you can go in different conditions, and how far of a breaking stretch you need to plan for.
- hellweaver666 ( @hellweaver666@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•1 year ago
Honestly if you can play that game you must have super human reflexes. I used to play it on the xbox360 and loved it but I’m older now and recently got it on ps5 and I’m just constantly smashing into shit. I would be terrible in a real car!
- Sooperstition ( @Sooperstition@lemmy.one ) 3•1 year ago
Maybe doing this will also make people more hesitant to get behind the wheel. If more people are aware of the risks of driving, maybe they’ll start to demand alternatives
- BurritoBooster ( @BurritoBooster@feddit.de ) 11•1 year ago
Germany’s driving test (and school) is fairly strict and will fail you for small mistakes which is good for beginners but after all, there is no test or reinsurance after some years of driving. After some time, people will see driving as a right not a privilege. This is the case for the vast majority of counties. This is the problem.
- Fubarberry ( @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) English9•1 year ago
Problem is that there’s no other alternative for most people. Unless you live in a city, public transportation isn’t a valid option. Most people living in most locations (at least in the US) have to have personal vehicles to attend school/work, shop, and socialize.
Once self driving cars become commonly available, driving will no longer be a requirement and I think that driving licenses should be stricter on who’s allowed to drive.
- AmosBurton_ThatGuy ( @AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca ) 10•1 year ago
The way I see it is fuck em, if you can’t safely drive and follow the rules to mimimize risk for everyone around you then pay for a taxi or take the bus. No public transport? Get your ass on a bike. Everytime I go out, even for a short 10 minute drive to the grocery store, 90% of the time I see someone doing something insanely stupid and dangerous but because nothing bad comes of it they don’t learn not to do that.
Driving a vehicle should be considered a huge privilege considering how easy it is to kill not just yourself, but others simply by being a dumbass and not taking it seriously enough. People back up without looking, make turns without looking, tons of dumb shit constantly, shit I had someone merge into my lane without even looking when I was right beside them, I had to slam on my brakes to get out of the way and I was only able to do that because there was no one behind me. I honked at them and they just flipped me off. There should also be a forced age limit for being able to drive cause old people are fucking terrible drivers, or at the very least they should have yearly tests past a certain age to ensure they’re still capable of driving.
Drive properly and safely or deal with the massive consequences of not being able to get around quickly. Need a license to get to/do your job? Drive safely or get fucked. Absolutely zero sympathy for shitty drivers.
- PepperTwist ( @PepperTwist@sopuli.xyz ) English4•1 year ago
shit I had someone merge into my lane without even looking when I was right beside them, I had to slam on my brakes to get out of the way and I was only able to do that because there was no one behind me. I honked at them and they just flipped me off
Man, this really pisses me off because I know they know they’re the dumbass who fucked up but their fragile ego can’t take being honked at so they flip you off nevertheless. Hate idiots like that.
- AmosBurton_ThatGuy ( @AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca ) 2•1 year ago
It infuriates me, but what’re ya gonna do right? Just gotta deal with the stupidity of the average person unfortunately.
- biddy ( @biddy@feddit.nl ) 2•1 year ago
We aren’t saying that they should be driving, quite the opposite. We’re saying that it’s completely fucked that in some places you have to drive to participate in society, precisely because many people shouldn’t. There needs to be alternatives to driving so that law enforcement can remove anyone’s license without effectively placing them in house arrest.
- psud ( @psud@aussie.zone ) 5•1 year ago
If cars became restricted, other options would come up. Better public transport would become available.
You would need an exception though for rural areas
- ndguardian ( @ndguardian@lemmy.studio ) English8•1 year ago
This is why I personally am looking forward to fully self-driving cars. We’re a long way off, but when self-driving cars can completely replace the human element, I think the world will be a much safer place.
- STUPIDVIPGUY ( @STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz ) 26•1 year ago
This is short-sighted. We need to entirely divert away from using cars as our primary mode of transportation.
- snowbell ( @snowbell@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year ago
Now there’s an unpopular opinion
- Catsrules ( @Catsrules@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year ago
Naa, I think self driving cars will fix most of the negatives of cars.
- STUPIDVIPGUY ( @STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz ) 3•1 year ago
How about spacial inefficiency? A car only carries 1-6 people compared to a train which carries dozens or even hundreds. Or a bus which carries dozens.
Explain to me how self-driving cars will fix that
- Catsrules ( @Catsrules@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
Traffic and parking are the biggest issue i see with cars and space efficiency. Both can be significantly improved on with self driving. Especially if most people opt for public ownership of cars and not private. Something think will become more popular as self driving takes over and lowers the cost of taking the self driving equivalent of a taxi or Uber.
By the way i think self driving cars will make trains more popular. As trains suck at first and last mile transportation. Self driving solves the first and last mile issues.
- STUPIDVIPGUY ( @STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz ) 3•1 year ago
If we’re going to opt for public ownership then why would you choose the less efficient single passenger method over already-established public infrastructure like trains and trams and buses which have been proven to work well in other countries?
Also please elaborate on how self driving cars will improve parking issues. And as for traffic, while self-driving cars will be less likely to cause accidents and jams, hundreds of independent low-capacity vehicles are in no way more effective than a single locomotive carrying those hundreds of people in a smaller space.
You’re allowed to like self-driving cars, but buses and trains are objectively more efficient in the large scale and all you have to do is acknowledge that. The more people realize this, the more room there is for us to make progress
- Catsrules ( @Catsrules@lemmy.ml ) 1•1 year ago
If we’re going to opt for public ownership then why would you choose the less efficient single passenger method over already-established public infrastructure like trains and trams and buses which have been proven to work well in other countries?
Simple we have already chosen cars in the US. It is far easier to use the existing roads to our advantage then try and redesign the entire country to fit a train and tram and bus model.
Also please elaborate on how self driving cars will improve parking issues.
In a public car the car will drop people off and drive away to pick up other people. There would be no need parking at all. Just a small drop off and pickup location.
Now this won’t work as well if we are talking about private ownership cars, but it would be better as the car can drop you off and then drive to a centralized parking location. This would remove the need for street parking or parking lots next to restaurants and stores. Or if your planning to stay a long time for exmaple if your going to work for 8 hours. I think many people might want rent out their car during the day. Car drops me off at work and I tell the car to join the “public car” network for 8 hours and it can go find some people to transport.
And as for traffic, while self-driving cars will be less likely to cause accidents and jams, hundreds of independent low-capacity vehicles are in no way more effective than a single locomotive carrying those hundreds of people in a smaller space.
Oh sure it won’t be as effective but it will be much better then what we have now. And there are benefits cars have over trains. For example after a the world pandemic scare I find traveling in my own space a much more pleasant experience then sharing with many other people. Also I really like listening to music in a car as full volume very enjoyable experience that you just can’t do on a public train :). A car will be a single vehicle to my destination, I can get in a fall asleep if I want. Buses and trains are usually multiple vehicles and you need to be some what alert to know when your stop is.
- argv_minus_one ( @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
Because if there’s one thing everybody needs, it’s to either triple their daily commute or live in a pod.
Cars are popular for a reason.
- NXTR ( @NXTR@artemis.camp ) 11•1 year ago
On the flip side I’m worried about manufacturers realizing that the continuous revenue stream from autonomous vehicles is more profitable than selling vehicles outright thereby increasing the cost of buying a vehicle to the point where ownership becomes functionally obsolete except to the ultra-wealthy. This also makes it much easier to restrict the movement of people. Self driving car companies could easily disable the ability to travel to entire areas either because they say they’re too dangerous or not profitable enough to operate in. I can imagine entire cities and rural areas becoming ghost towns. While personally I think autonomous vehicles, in a vacuum, have the potential to save countless lives, the reality is that in time we will be giving the companies making these vehicles the ability to dictate where we can and cannot go.
- octobob ( @octobob@lemmy.ml ) 3•1 year ago
I think this is spot on.
Adding onto this, city driving is just… different, in a way that I think a human element is always going to be needed. Sometimes you need to take a risky left, or cut across the double yellow lines into the other lane past someone, or run a yellow. Are these things unsafe? Of course. But when it’s rush hour you have to be a dick just to get through it sometimes. In 2016, Uber built and tested their self-driving cars in my city of Pittsburgh, because we notoriously have some of the worst and most confusing spaghetti messes of roads in the country. They stopped whenever a car struck and killed someone. I rode in one one time because I was just tryin to call an Uber for a concert, and since it couldn’t go on the highway it took the worst way through downtown, and got stuck at a red light for over 5 minutes because the car was waiting to take a left, and everyone was going around us and not giving us a break.
Also, all these new cars with their auto-correcting features scare the shit out of me. What happens when you go across the double yellow to go around someone riding a bicycle and it swerves you back into their lane?
You could call these bugs to be worked out but I feel infinitely safer when I’m the one doing the driving. In a perfect world maybe our infrastructure and transport would’ve been planned differently but I swear half the roads around here are based on deer trails or something, winding through crazy hills in the woods. I’ve heard self-driving cars do best on roads specially designed for them. We can’t even get the city to fix our thousands of potholes, or crumbling infrastructure. We had a major bridge collapse a couple years ago, and the way it was rated during inspections was pretty close to the other ones around here. So how on earth are self-driving car roads going to be put in?
- argv_minus_one ( @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
That’s probably going to happen with or without self-driving.
- OOFshoot ( @OofShoot@beehaw.org ) 7•1 year ago
There’s a few places that didn’t get cars until later and “no thank you” was a very common reaction. We really ought to just ban private ownership.
- Gargleblaster ( @Gargleblaster@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
People who die while driving are almost all die by accident.
People who get shot are far more likely to be killed intentionally.
- CherryBlossom01 ( @CherryBlossom01@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
As a disabled person who’s visually impaired I totally agree with this!
- rockhandle ( @rockhandle@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
Imo it’s kinda unavoidable. Humans make mistakes all the time. We could greatly reduce the risk however, if we simply reduced our reliance on independent vehicles. Unfortunately this depends on the place where you live as well but if possible, it would be much safer for the collective majority to bike/walk to areas or use public transport where applicable as it would drop the amount of traffic on the roads
- ARg94 ( @ARg94@lemmy.packitsolutions.net ) 1•10 months ago
Lol. What a tyrant.
- CheeseBread ( @CheeseBread@lemmy.ml ) 178•1 year ago
Pansexual, polysexual, and omnisexual are all microlabels and are all subsets of bisexual. You don’t need more labels than gay, straight, and bi.
Edit: I forgot about asexuals. But I specifically only care about bi subsets. They’re dumb, and you only need bi
- Teon ( @Teon@kbin.social ) 154•1 year ago
All religions should be heavily taxed. NO EXCEPTIONS!!
- frozen ( @frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz ) 139•1 year ago
Being fat is a choice the vast majority of the time, and I have a huge bias against big people.
I used to be fat (250ish lbs (110ish kg) at 5’8"ish (172ish cm)), and as much as I would like to blame my shit on anything else, the person feeding me, the person sitting at the computer for hours, the person actively avoiding all physical activity was me and no one else. After I got diagnosed with some weight related shit, I turned my entire life upside down, am at a much healthier 150 lbs (68ish kg), and feel so much better, both physically and mentally.
I’m aware of my bias, and I make every active effort to counter it in my actual dealings with bigger people. Especially because there are certain circumstances, however rarely, where it may not actually be their fault. But I’d be lying if I said my initial impression was anything except “God, what a lazy, fat fuck.”
Edit: Added metric units
- Thorny_Thicket ( @Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz ) 119•1 year ago
We don’t need more pronouns. We need less of them.
In my native language there is no even he/she pronouns. The word is “hän” and it’s gender neutral. You can be male, female, FTM, MTF, non-binary or what ever and you’re still called “hän”. You can identify as anything you like and “hän” already includes you.
- richieadler ( @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one ) English116•1 year ago
Most people shouldn’t be parents.
- Ringmasterincestuous ( @Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone ) English113•1 year ago
After an entity reaches an annual cap (say $5m profit), 95c of every dollar should be taxed
- Sombyr ( @Sombyr@lemmy.one ) 89•1 year ago
Most conservatives, however deeply red, are not intentionally hateful and are usually open to rational discussion. People just don’t know how to have rational discussions nowadays and the few times they do, they don’t know how to think like somebody else and put things in a way they can understand.
People nowadays think because a point convinced them, it should convince everybody else and anybody who’s not convinced by it is just being willfully ignorant. The truth is we all process things differently and some people need to hear totally different arguments to understand, often put in ways that wouldn’t convince you if you heard it.
It’s hard to understand other people and I feel like the majority of people have given up trying in favor of assuming everybody who disagrees with you knows their wrong and refuses to admit it.
- LoudWaterHombre ( @loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 85•1 year ago
Tax is not theft
- Wilshire ( @Wilshire@beehaw.org ) English79•1 year ago
Owning a second home should be illegal.
- shrugal ( @shrugal@lemm.ee ) 68•1 year ago
We have blown the concept of ownership way out of proportion. No one should be able to own things they have absolutely no connection to, like investment firms owning companies they don’t work for, houses they don’t live in or land they’ve never been to.
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 68•1 year ago
It is really hard to have an unpopular opinion unless you are mentally deranged/a conspiracy theorist.
As evidenced by the comments under this very post. Even when trying most people can’t come up with an actually unpopular opinion.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 66•1 year ago
Lemmy.world holding such a prevalent place in the Lemmy/Kbin part of the Fediverse makes it a major single point of failure.
They should still be the newcomers instance, but communities and users should migrate to other instances to increase the resilience of the Fediverse.
- Scrubbles ( @scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ) English24•1 year ago
in a weird way it’s good that it’s failing, I’ve seen an uptick in signups as people search for other instances
- MxM111 ( @MxM111@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
It is not what is called “single point of failure “. Usually if “single point of failure “ fails, the whole thing fails. I am on kbin and experience zero failures.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 10•1 year ago
If they were to actually go down (the current failures do not affect the backend), all of the communities they host wouldn’t be usable anymore, taking down a large portion of the Lemmy/Kbin communities.
- MxM111 ( @MxM111@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
Only those that are on lemmy.world. There are tons of communities/magazines elsewhere. When lemmy.world goes down, I learn about it from posts. Otherwise, I would not notice.
- redballooon ( @redballooon@lemm.ee ) 8•1 year ago
I created my first account there, which still exists. But on day 3 I created one at another instance, which I have used almost exclusively since.
I wonder how many of their users are actually active.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 4•1 year ago
22k active monthly users
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 2•1 year ago
Doesn’t say much as many of these could have just tried lemmy.world for a few minutes and then discarded the account. Or they could be super active. The statistic doesn’t say.
- coyootje ( @coyootje@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
Same here, I created my first account there while simultaneously creating this one on Kbin.social. With all the issues there were with lemmy.world I’ve decided to use this one for a while instead to see how I like Kbin. It’s been pretty nice so far, the only thing that sucks is that I haven’t found a good Kbin app for Android yet.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
Isn’t Artemis in beta?
- coyootje ( @coyootje@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
It is and I have it installed but it’s not fully doing what I want it to do yet. For example, as far as I’m aware I can’t log in with my Kbin.social account in the app.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
Interesting, I thought it was implemented
- freamon ( @freamon@endlesstalk.org ) English2•1 year ago
- Synthead ( @Synthead@lemmy.ml ) 5•1 year ago
The uptime on lemmy.world is terrible. https://lemmy-world.statuspage.io currently shows 95% uptime, but it has been “down” from a UX perspective more than half the time I attempted to use it. The uptime reporting is simply not picking up when something is off as much as it should. And they recently added an archive.org proxy for when it goes down… what the heck? I understand that it is run by volunteers and all, but what a buzzkill.
- rufus ( @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de ) 3•1 year ago
They are been attacked with a DDoS attack for quite some time now. I’m afraid there isn’t much they can do.
Reference: https://lemmy.world/post/2923697
- C_Spinoff ( @C_Spinoff@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
now who…
- rufus ( @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•1 year ago
now who what?
- caron ( @caron@lemmy.zip ) 1•1 year ago
The post mentioned unpopular opinions.
- Blaze ( @Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•1 year ago
I was unpopular 3 months ago
- eddy ( @eddy@infosec.pub ) 64•1 year ago
Religion is nothing more then social engineering on a grand scale.