- theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 50•1 year ago
I like the idea of FreeBSD, but I can’t see the point of giving up on my Linux conveniences to switch over to it. What advantages does it provide, and are they worth the switch, considering I’m losing a lot of software, as well as any semblance of gaming?
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 53•1 year ago
The advantage is that you can rebrand it, close the source and sell it as your invention.
Btw, did you know that Apple invented Unix?
- MazonnaCara89 ( @MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml ) 21•1 year ago
Apple invented Unix?? What the hell are you talking about?
Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, Brian Kernighan, Douglas McIlroy, and Joe Ossanna at Bell Labs developed and invented Unix.
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 48•1 year ago
This was a joke about how Apple just takes open source stuff (in this case, they used FreeBSD as a basis for MacOS/iOS/iPadOS/tvOS/watchOS), rebrands it and then claims it was theirs.
- MazonnaCara89 ( @MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml ) 14•1 year ago
💀
- duncesplayed ( @duncesplayed@lemmy.one ) English15•1 year ago
What advantages does it provide
ZFS, mostly. There are some smaller peripheral things (like much better manpages), but these days the big one is probably ZFS. Zero licensing conflicts allows it to be an integral part of the kernel.
- lnxtx ( @lnxtx@feddit.nl ) 6•1 year ago
FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE switched to the OpenZFS implementation[1]:
The ZFS implementation is now provided by OpenZFS. 9e5787d2284e (Sponsored by iXsystems)
So no big differences now, except for the licensing.
- λλλ ( @lambda@programming.dev ) 5•1 year ago
Can you explain the differences between the license like I’m five?
- raptir ( @raptir@lemdro.id ) English6•1 year ago
Linux is licensed under the GPL, which is described as “copyleft.” The GPL requires that if you want to use GPL code you need to license your modified code under the GPL.
FreeBSD is licensed under the BSD license, which is a permissive license. Basically as long as you stick the license statement in your documentation you can do whatever you want with BSD-licensed code. This is why commercial uses (like the Wii’s OS) tend to be BSD-based rather than Linux-based.
- theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 2•1 year ago
like better manpages
I want them now! I want the better manpages! Has someone decided to create inproved manpages for Linux? I think this could be a great idea for a project or an organisation. Manprove, the organisation to improve Unix manual pages.
- dino ( @dino@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•11 months ago
Isn’t this actually impossible because manpages are maintained by distros? And the benefit of freedbsd being everything is created by the same team? Aka FreeBSD being a complete distro and not just a kernel?
- fogetaboutit ( @fogetaboutit@programming.dev ) 15•1 year ago
Still dont get the point of freebsd.
- Solaris1789 ( @Solaris1789@jlai.lu ) 44•1 year ago
Unbreakably stable, cohesive (no need to fit and manage tens of different pieces to get a get a functionning OS), performant, bhyve, BSD licensed (can be a pro or con tho). It has quite a lot of stuff that makes it worthy of Linux or other BSDs.
EDIT: Almost forgot ZFS.
- djsaskdja ( @djsaskdja@endlesstalk.org ) 30•1 year ago
Much smaller footprint than Linux. If you’re running a server, it’s much less vulnerable to malicious exploits.
- quat ( @quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org ) 29•1 year ago
There’s an old saying: “Linux users use Linux because they hate Windows. BSD users use BSD because they love Unix.” Obviously this is not true for every individual user, but I think it describes a trend or pattern.
- BeigeAgenda ( @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca ) 21•1 year ago
FreeBSD is the tool you don’t know you need, and then suddenly there’s the perfect use case, because those BSD alchemists never get tired of tinkering on it and suddenly BSD overtake Linux or Windows in some areas. You think Linux is everywhere, same with BSD its just better at hiding.
- mbw ( @mbw@feddit.de ) 18•1 year ago
and then suddenly there’s the perfect use case
Yeah but like WHAT?
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 19•1 year ago
Like when you want to have a fully-fledged OS that you can rebrand, close the source and sell as your invention.
- The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
The BSDs are very popular for wifi routers and modems
- BeigeAgenda ( @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca ) 3•1 year ago
How can I know? it’s something people need to research when they choose OS for their projects.
- On ( @On@kbin.social ) 6•1 year ago
BSD overtake Linux or Windows in some areas
Any examples? besides the well known security, lower footprint and simplicity. genuinely curious.
- Album ( @Album@lemmy.ca ) 5•1 year ago
25ms boot time?
- s_s ( @s_s@lemmy.one ) 5•1 year ago
ZFS? pf?
The tooling is just superior in some cases.
- LufyCZ ( @LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English11•1 year ago
zfs is available on Linux just fine
- BeigeAgenda ( @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca ) 2•1 year ago
I know the points you mentioned but I don’t really follow much about BSD, but I have respect for it and knows it’s there the day I need it.
- myersguy ( @myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website ) 13•1 year ago
How do you mean? Like, how is this different than someone saying “I don’t get the point of Linux”?
- Oliver Lowe ( @otl@lemmy.sdf.org ) 5•1 year ago
Haha yeah actually I wonder whether people actually did ask this when Linux started making the rounds. If I read the history right BSD was already almost 15 years old at the time!
- The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) English5•1 year ago
It was, but there wasn’t an i386 BSD yet (which is where OpenBSD and NetBSD enter the picture). Linus Torvalds has said if OpenBSD had been available when he started the linux kernal, he would have just used that instead
- The Cuuuuube ( @Cube6392@beehaw.org ) English10•1 year ago
BSD that’s easier to run in places than OpenBSD or NetBSD
- nyakojiru ( @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 6•1 year ago
Still , as with Linux, you spend hours in configuring something that in windows just installs and runs … not saying windows is the best OS , but as all companies … it is less time consuming and everything just runs on it.
- donuts ( @donuts@kbin.social ) 36•1 year ago
Kind of hard to believe people still say stuff like this…
There is plenty of stuff that Linux does much better than Windows, for example containerized service and applications, which is why Windows needs a Linux subsystem at all. It’s possible that the main reason you think Linux is bad is that you aren’t as familiar with it.
The biggest downside to Linux remains official hardware and software support, though that’s a business economics issue and not a technical limitation.
I honestly could not imagine a circumstance in which I go back to using Windows or switch over to Mac, because Linux does basically everything I want and then some.
- radau ( @radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English28•1 year ago
When was the last time you ran a distro and how awful was the hardware to have this experience? In the past 10 years all of them have been fairly “hit the ground running” for me unless it had something weird like Nvidia Optimus
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 3•1 year ago
Anything involving Nvidia, really.
I installed Xubuntu on an old laptop with a Geforce 635M. During installation I checked “Install proprietary drivers”. So it installs the current Nvidia driver instead of the correct legacy one for my GPU, even though it obviously would be able to tell which GPU I have installed.
So then I uninstalled the current one and installed the correct legacy one, but the driver still doesn’t work. Took me quite a while that apt remove/install only removes/installs the packages but doesn’t actually load/unload the drivers from the kernel.
So I loaded the legacy driver into the kernel, but it still didn’t work. Apparently, the current driver takes precedence, even though it doesn’t even support the GPU at all.
In the end I had to reinstall the current one, unload both drivers from the kernel, uninstall the current driver and load the legacy driver.
This took me a few hours and I am pretty sure that someone who doesn’t have an IT degree would probably just not have a working GPU and that’s that.
Then I spent a few hours to get Optimus to run, but couldn’t figure it out. So now this laptop cannot be used without a battery source for any decent amount of time, because the GPU is constantly running and consumes massive amounts of energy just to render e.g. a browser window.
Edit: And for sure, anyone who says they have ever had difficulties with anything regarding Linux is directly getting downvotes. That’s also a big issue regarding Linux. Whenever someone has trouble or asks for help, there’s always some helpful fanboy ready to downvote and call you a noob. Funnily enough, these fanboys usually are running Linux for two weeks so far.
- Rikudou_Sage ( @rikudou@lemmings.world ) 11•1 year ago
I don’t know what sort of bubble people live in, or if people convinced themselves that a computer getting slower over time because of OS clutter is normal, but every Windows PC I ever had had shit ton of problems, getting slow to the point of feeling like I have a $100 laptop instead of a $2000 one being the most common.
And can’t say MacOS is much better, at least judging by my gf getting freezes all the time and having to reboot by holding the power button.
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 1•1 year ago
My Kubuntu work laptop is also getting slower and slower, same as my Android phone. That’s just what happens if you useany OS extensively.
Cleaning and maintenance is necessary on any OS.
Also, with a bit of skill and care, a Windows PC can easily be kept fresh for a decade.
- Rikudou_Sage ( @rikudou@lemmings.world ) English1•1 year ago
I use my PC extensively and my Linux PC doesn’t get noticeably slower just because I’ve installed a few things.
- MiddledAgedGuy ( @MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org ) 7•1 year ago
I don’t want to agree with this comment. And in fact I would say most of the time I don’t. Most stuff “just works” nowadays. But I do occasionally have to fight with something I wouldn’t in Windows. Easily worth it IMO but that’s not going to be everyone’s take.
- remotelove ( @remotelove@lemmy.ca ) 0•1 year ago
More context please. There are a ton of things that “just work” on Linux, just like Windows. I have spent hours troubleshooting and configuring things on Windows as well.
With either OS, time spent configuring and installing things is heavily dependent on the experience of the user and their ability to interpret logs and error messages. With most OS’s, configuration and troubleshooting is just a matter of “knowing where to look” combined with understanding how the OS itself works.
Server services are much easier to configure on Linux, IMHO. Additionally, I find configuration to be much more flexible and (generally) more intuitive than Windows but that is my opinion. However, I have worked with both Linux and Windows since they were created, so I have a good number of years of experience.
My point is that it really depends on what you are wanting to do.
(Rant: Deep troubleshooting in Windows has always sucked and the methods to do so have changed a thousand times over the years. It’s a royal pain to keep up, TBH. Very rarely have I needed “reinstall Linux” because something was broken beyond fixing.)
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 0•1 year ago
The guy before isn’t exactly wrong.
Many things that “just work” on Linux are things you just don’t do on Windows. E.g. swapping the DE or theming/customizing the whole thing usually works great out of the box. But on Windows you just don’t do that.
On the other hand, getting e.g. legacy Nvidia drivers working correctly and setup so that it automatically switches between the power-consuming dGPU and the power-saving iGPU is a major pain in the rear. On Windows that just works. Mostly Nvidias fault, but to the user who has to deal with the situation it doesn’t matter who is at fault.
And in general, if you come from Windows with a lot of Windows experience and then have to dive into Linux, you mainly notice the things that don’t just work on Linux.
Also, fixing problems in Windows might take you through the registry or arcane wizards. But you hardly ever get into CLI and never into config files. So if you swap over to Linux, where almost any help you find online will go straight into CLI and config files (even if a GUI solution would be available), that can be pretty jarring.
I’ve been using Linux professionally for ~15 years and privately for ~5. But I still remeber getting into it very vivdly.
- remotelove ( @remotelove@lemmy.ca ) 0•1 year ago
Very good points. I remember the drama of trying to get simple things like USB, Bluetooth and even WiFi working on Linux quite a few years ago. However, even though those could be problematic, I did learn a ton about how drivers interacted with various chipsets. That, in turn, led me down the path of how to apply specific patches and build my own kernel modules. It was absolutely a double edged sword.
It really is a shame that most GPU vendors haven’t spent more time developing better drivers for Linux, but in some ways, I feel their pain. (I am leaving out the open vs closed source debate on that.) Windows does provide consistency, through all of its shortcomings. Linux can be very … eh… interesting between different distros, for sure.
But yeah, I didn’t rush to downvote the above commenter as they were speaking from their own perspective and experience. No shame in that.
- Square Singer ( @squaresinger@feddit.de ) 2•1 year ago
Uh, Wifi drivers in the 2000s on Linux… That was painful. I remember one specific Wifi USB stick, where the Linux driver just came as source code. I mean, good for them for making an open source driver, but back then I was just a teenager with very little coding experience, and they had no guide on how to compile it at all. Also it was written for an older version of gcc than what I had, and gcc threw a ton of errors because that. So I had to go through the whole driver source and fix all these compiler errors, even though I had no C++ experience at all. Just to get a dumb Wifi stick to work.
In Windows, back than, it was just “plonk it in, double click the driver on the CD and be done”. I don’t miss those days.
- L'unico Dee ( @lunicoDee@feddit.it ) 2•1 year ago
I think some gentoo with “bare minimum to boot” bootloader, kernel and init would beat that
- some_guy ( @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ) 1•1 year ago
I wanted to comment on this being a cool read, but there’s too much happening in this thread that is beyond my knowledge. But anyway, cool that this guy is optimizing things like a mofo.
- sodiumbromley ( @sodiumbromley@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English1•1 year ago
I also thought it was a fascinating read and wanted to comment, but your comment made me scroll down and now I don’t even know what Linux is anymore.