There will be exemptions for legitimate uses of nitrous oxide, for example in medical or catering industries. The gas is commonly used as a painkiller and for producing whipped cream in cooking.

        • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Absolutely, although I wouldn’t say NOS is substituted for weed all that much. Also, the legal limit for weed and driving should be raised, particularly since the government asked the scientific community where the level of impairment was and then set it lower.

          • Worx ( Worx@lemmynsfw.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 years ago

            I’m in favour of legalising drugs, but driving is dangerous and should only be done when you are sober and able to give your full attention.

            • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 years ago

              Absolutely, however if the level of intoxication is below the level of impairment, then the drug is not having a negative effect on driving.

            • Tropic420 ( Tropic420@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              We have this discussion currently about Weed in Germany. Its so annoying to See articles with headlines Like “cannabis behind the wheel” etc. Noone ist advocating for people to Drive under the influence. But If i smoked a Joint on friday and get stopped on monday, i’ll lose my drivers license even though im sober. Drugs stay in your system way longer than the actual effect.

        • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s in no way unfeasible - and the deposits end up paying for the ongoing operation of the system.

          Which is better, addressing the littering problem directly, or criminalising and litigating against a bunch of people with a law that can’t be enforced if they have a can of cream on them?

          • RaivoKulli ( RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            The deposit is just a deposit, it doesn’t pay for anything. Are you sure you understand how the deposit in this case works? You pay for something and you get that back when you return the item.

            Maybe you should look into something like the Finnish bottle deposit scheme. It’s great but those take quite some time and effort to set up and get running properly.

            • TWeaK ( TWeaK@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Not everyone returns and collects the deposit back, these deposits end up funding the operations.

              If the Finnish scheme is anything like the German scheme, that’s what I was thinking of. Although it doesn’t need to be quite so widespread with machines inside every supermarket.

              • RaivoKulli ( RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                They’ll have to wait with just taking the deposit money since for quite a long time you wouldn’t know if they’re returning it or not. And if it’s anything like other systems, you can return it to different place than the one you paid for, which requires moving money around and whatnot. And there’s the issue of getting them from the stores to be recycled and overall upkeep and governance of the system and so on.

                The systems are a lot more complex than one might think at first.

  • Echo Dot ( echodot@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    I feel like it’s actually kind of already an illicit substance and therefore illegal.

    So at this point they’re just making laws to make things that are already illegal more illegal but it doesn’t matter because none of them are enforced anyway.

  • AutoTL;DR ( autotldr@lemmings.world ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The government’s decision to make possession a crime goes against recommendations from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which advised against new laws to ban nitrous oxide.

    Announcing the law change on Tuesday, Home Secretary Suella Braverman said people in the UK were “fed up with yobs abusing drugs in public spaces and leaving behind a disgraceful mess for others to clean up”.

    The government’s crime and policing minister Chris Philp said: "There is no question that abusing laughing gas is dangerous to people’s health and it is paramount we take decisive action before the situation gets worse.

    Prof David Nutt, from Imperial College London’s department of medicine, previously said there was around about one death per year in the UK from around one million nitrous oxide users.

    Repeated hits of nitrogen dioxide can deplete body levels of an important vitamin called B12, which, in turn, can cause permanent nerve damage.

    It can affect both the spinal cord and the nerves in arms and legs, causing loss of feeling, abnormal sensations and muscle weakness or even full paralysis.


    The original article contains 917 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Genuine No Stupid Question: Doesn’t this gaz Affect like the Nerve System which means that it kills slowly people? Compare to something like Cannabis which temporarily only alters the sense but does not damage the body?

    • Revan343 ( Revan343@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is about its use as a drug, rather than its use in racing.

      Also, I’d imagine racing NOS isn’t as pure as the food-grade NOS people use recreationally