- cross-posted to:
- cpp@lemmy.ml
- Helix 🧬 ( @Helix@feddit.de ) 20•2 years ago
- thervingi ( @thervingi@lemmy.ml ) 19•2 years ago
I thought this was Rust
- AgreeableLandscape ( @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml ) 17•2 years ago
Isn’t that supposed to be Go’s job?
Is Go compatible with C++?
- pingveno ( @pingveno@lemmy.ml ) 4•2 years ago
Not seamlessly. That’s pretty much impossible given the complexity of C++. Go does interoperate with C via cgo, which can be made to produce something like C++ compatibility.
- wiki_me ( @wiki_me@lemmy.ml ) 3•2 years ago
I don’t go is for performance critical applications.
- millertime ( @millertime@lemmy.ml ) 2•2 years ago
hmm I thought Go was written as a “better C”
edit: checked my facts and indeed its designers made it because of their dislike for C++
- Amicese ( @Amicchan@lemmy.ml ) 10•2 years ago
Yep. Google is trying to recuperate C++, as I thought in the past.
- IngrownMink4 ( @IngrownMink4@lemmy.ml ) 8•2 years ago
Interesting. I’m looking forward to seeing how it performs in the real world against programming languages like Rust.
- mogoh ( @mogoh@lemmy.ml ) 8•2 years ago
- Tiuku ( @Tiuku@sopuli.xyz ) 4•2 years ago
Not pure functional, pff
- Redo11 ( @Redo11@szmer.info ) 3•2 years ago
Another language that will be useless for ages, until different project will use it, just like dart and flutter, but this time it will be carbon and fushia, IG.
- RoboHack ( @robohack@lemmy.ca ) 1•2 years ago
Doesn’t impress me much, but then again I’m not a C++ programmer – more like ANTI-C++!