•  DEADBEEF   ( @DEADBEEF@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6111 months ago

    Microsoft has recently announced Windows Copilot, an AI-powered assistant for Windows 11. Windows Copilot sits at the side of Windows 11, and can summarize content you’re viewing in apps, rewrite it, or even explain it. Microsoft is currently testing this internally and promised to release it to testers in June before rolling it out more broadly to Windows 11 users.

    Oh my God, they’re bringing back clippy.

  • I guess that means more people switching to linux, assuming they eventually 100% phase out non-cloud. Not even because “cloud bad” - there will be some of that, but because of the sheer number of people who don’t pay for windows, not paying for it isn’t an option if they control it completely.

    •  Lupec   ( @lupec@lemmy.lpcha.im ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Yup, that’d also be the case for people like me who stick with Windows for gaming compatibility/convenience reasons and critical GPU features the Linux drivers just don’t implement (looking at you, DLDSR). That, or just anyone with a GPU, I suppose, assuming the hardware market would look remotely like it does nowadays by then.

  •  iax   ( @iax@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4611 months ago

    Are we doing the nobody reads the article thing here too? This isn’t a replacement for Windows as an operating system, it’s a cloud based version of the OS being sold to consumers. They’re trying to compete with inexpensive Chromebooks, not take away your PC.

    •  NightOwl   ( @NightOwl@lemmy.one ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I did, but it sounds like what the headlines implied to me

      Microsoft has been increasingly moving Windows to the cloud on the commercial side with Windows 365, but the software giant also wants to do the same for consumers.

      The idea of moving Windows fully to the cloud for consumers is also presented alongside Microsoft’s need to invest in custom silicon partnerships.

      Yeah, it is fair to say it’s just an alternative option to a non cloud based OS, but some people are extrapolating based on Microsoft moves the past few years with the subscription model they’ve pushed for Office and OS coming with office versions that require you to sign in to an account to use.

      And versions of Windows that don’t come with pre-installed ad apps like Facebook or Candy Crush aren’t commercially available.

  • No thank you.

    Also I bet instead of a one-time license you can have the privilege of paying $9.99 a month forever or lose access to all your files. And possibly requiring an internet connection to use your desktop computer?

      • tbh, windows user since the 90s, tried *nix desktops since the early 00s every few years. Used to have a thing where I would force myself to use it for 6 months and it would fail again and again.

        In the last year, ive been using ubuntu (which i know isint the best desktop to use even) as a dev system on some of my work. Unlike in the past I am no longer finding an unreasonable delta between the user expectations in linux vs windows systems. I need to drop to a cli for both with ~ the same propensity once I do anything advanced. Not having a registry is a blessing I never thought I would be able to have in a rich visual system.

        Long time .NET / Azure dev - moving to linux. After all, what do you think remote windows will run under-the-covers?

        • That’s a pretty similar story to mine. Used Linux pretty exclusively over a decade ago, then switched back for my gaming PC. Now that I’m back on Linux though, I don’t see any reason to use windows on anything but my company PC, Linux is just better IMO now.

        • As another dev here, I have barely used a PC/laptop outside of work in years. I got a gaming PC like 2 years back and don’t use it much. But every time I get the hankering for some personal dev project and have to mess with the registry I cry inside. I really need to just ditch it for Linux entirely. I’m so much more comfortable on Linux. You might just convince me to bite the bullet and remove it entirely since 90% of my gaming is on steamdeck anyway.

          • Since WSL2 and terminal preview I have spent more time doing “nix things” than windows things anyway, I even do a lot of windows file management through ubuntu since the Linux tools are more expressive.

            Much of my day is web browser, cli and VSCode. The desktops are capable, at this point its more about getting used to a different set of keyboard shortcuts, my next build out will be a linux system for sure.

          •  manitcor   ( @manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            pretty much, though my understanding is they ended up making thier own “wine” that leverages hyper-v. Seems like they are still banking on thier own hypervisor. Can’t say I blame them. no way MS hands thier ops to VMWare.

            EDIT: Honestly, I would expect NT4/Server2000 based windows to be sunset within a decade in place of a linux kernel version that has a window manager developed in microsoft’s signature style. A large number of newer UWP apps will port relatively easily if already written on .NET core and microsoft has indicated they are starting to think more like apple when it comes to some levels of compatibility.

  •  vracker   ( @vracker@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3411 months ago

    Didn’t read the article.

    The idea of online only software irritates me. Of course multiplayer games have to work this way. When blizzard and Ubisoft started requiring an active connection for single player games that was just going too far.

    Can you imagine sitting at your computer, doing literally anything. The screen goes strait to blue with the windows shutting down screen saying, “Internet disrupted, please contact your provider for support”.

      •  towerful   ( @towerful@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1611 months ago

        Never mind flaky internet, what about people that do events?

        Things like PowerPoint presentation machines, VJ systems, video servers (for massive multiscreen playback).
        You can’t go into a field for a festival and expect reliable internet.
        You can’t go into a theatre and expect reliable internet, especially when 3k+ people turn up.
        There are a few systems that run OSX, but Apple’s hardware doesn’t give you as much control as something like an Nvidia Quadro with sync cards. 99% of the big shows will be ran from Windows OS

        • Apple can barely figure out how to get a picture out of their own hardware. Monitor support is surprisingly an afterthought in a graphical operating system often used by artists. I shouldn’t need to download scripts from GitHub to change my RGB monitor to run in RGB mode. With such an expensive computer, I should be able to connect multiple monitors at the same time like I can on much cheaper computers.

        • ChromeOS is just a regular OS. Without internet, everything continues to work that was designed to work. It’s about the same as Windows that way.

          However, Chromebooks have planned obsolescence, and most devices lose official OS updates after some number of years, with many having weird hardware that makes it difficult to move to another operating system.

    •  Duxon   ( @Duxon@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 months ago

      With Chromebooks? ChromeOS is a pretty solid Linux distro if you’d ask me. It is built around cloud-sync and Google Drive, but otherwise perfectly fine to use offline. Even Steam is supported nowadays

      • The best thing I ever did with that one used Chromebook I bought was install Gallium OS on it. I ended up with a fully functioning laptop that was able to fulfill my mobile computing needs for $50. It’s a shame Gallium got discontinued. ChromeOS was very primitive and restrictive when I tried it 5 or 6 years ago, but you say they even support Steam now, so apparently they’ve made some improvements. Still wouldn’t want to use it over a Linux distro like Gallium that would let me have full control of the device, though.

        In case anyone reading this is interesting in alternatives to ChromeOS, more info can be found here: https://mrchromebox.tech/#alt_os

    •  fuser   ( @fuser@quex.cc ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      Almost 20 percent of users are on mac. Linux desktops are still less than 3 percent.

      The majority of new server-based innovation is on Linux. Desktop Linux is objectively better than either alternative these days. Given how slick and easy to use the free Linux desktop distros have become. It really should be more popular as a desktop OS.

      Don’t underestimate the potential of Desktop Linux - the lack of adoption is a running joke, but M$FT doing something exceptionally stupid, e.g. forcing an LLM inside an OS (which sounds like clippy on acid), could trigger an awakening and “the great migration” someday

      https://itsfoss.com/linux-market-share/#operating-system-market-share-june-2023

  • Okay but what happens if you don’t have a good net connection like at the coffee shop or airports? I swear sometimes people are clueless and just assume you always have good internet when that’s not often the case!

  •  redcalcium   ( @redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Microsoft has recently announced Windows Copilot, an AI-powered assistant for Windows 11. Windows Copilot sits at the side of Windows 11, and can summarize content you’re viewing in apps, rewrite it, or even explain it. Microsoft is currently testing this internally and promised to release it to testers in June before rolling it out more broadly to Windows 11 users.

    Assuming this will use OpenAI API like other Microsoft’s AI products, this is going to be expensive to operate. Subsidizing it indefinitely is surely not an option. How would Microsoft monetize it? By charging subscription like GitHub Copilot, or monetizing it somehow using users data they collected? I assume it would be the latter.

    •  boonhet   ( @boonhet@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      There’s talk about Microsoft SoCs on their own products, much like Apple does the M1 SoCs.

      These Microsoft SoCs would be used in Surface devices and likely have dedicated AI hardware. Again, much like Apple.

      If we’re talking about specialized models, not one generic LLM for everything a la GPT4, they might not have to be THAT big and could run on reasonably powerful devices.

      • I really doubt that, at least for the next few years. “AI Assistant” usually means LLMs, and even M2 struggles to run them mostly due to large compute and RAM requirements. If Microsoft could somehow release a truly local AI assistant feature that can run on average windows users’ hardware, that would be shake the whole ML industry.

        •  boonhet   ( @boonhet@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          True, but they could get the base requirements of a task using OpenAI and then use specialized models locally to do subtasks.

          Microsoft owns 49% of OpenAI, they don’t need to pay nearly as much per request as we do and the cost will likely decrease over time too.