- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@derp.foo
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@derp.foo
- MorrisonMotel6 ( @MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee ) 9•1 year ago
Like, I LOVE Daft Punk, but…why? Is anyone looking for this? I appreciate some of the BTS stuff they have out out recently for RAM, but I just don’t understand this at all. This, for me, just kind of tarnishes their legacy to me with all the commercialization.
Maybe there are fans out there who think differently. I hope they enjoy RAM without percussion
- 4am ( @4am@lemm.ee ) English21•1 year ago
So the original intent of the album can be realized - so it can more easily be sampled into French house tracks made by the next generation.
- MorrisonMotel6 ( @MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee ) 3•1 year ago
I appreciate this explanation! Thank you. The world isn’t about just me! Who would have thought?!?
- raptir ( @raptir@lemdro.id ) English2•1 year ago
Well, of course. Because it’s about just me.
…right?
- grooving ( @grooving@lemmy.studio ) 9•1 year ago
It’ll make it easier for djs to remix.
- apprehensively_human ( @apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca ) English2•1 year ago
Some songs like Within I can at least somewhat understand, the percussive backing is pretty mild. But imagine listening to Giorgio without that drum solo.
- bermuda ( @bermuda@beehaw.org ) English1•1 year ago
The rumor I’ve heard is they had a three-record contract with Columbia and the original RAM was only one album under Columbia. Nearly everything else before that was released under Warner or Virgin. They did a 10th anniversary of RAM about 6 months ago which counts as a second. Drumless counts as a third, then.
- bermuda ( @bermuda@beehaw.org ) English4•1 year ago
- pacoboyd ( @pacoboyd@lemm.ee ) 2•1 year ago
Damn, so good