- GreyShuck ( @GreyShuck@feddit.uk ) 6•1 year ago
Good to see that NE actually has the resources to take action in cases like this - they are massively under-resourced.
However, I wonder how much the cost of this to the developer - £14500 - most of which are court costs - is actually a deterrent. That is not a lot for many developments, and I can see that it would be tempting to simply write it off as an acceptable cost.
There was no mention of whether they developer was required, as a result of this judgement, to add the access tiles and replace the felt as the original licence required either.
- Big_Twerp ( @Big_Twerp@feddit.uk ) English1•1 year ago
It looks like they might be made to replace the roof lining (otherwise they would be contravening their planning commitments) so that will cost them.
- jonne ( @jonne@infosec.pub ) English5•1 year ago
Oi, you got a loicence for those bats?
- GenXcisGuy ( @GenXcisGuy@beehaw.org ) English1•1 year ago
Eric, the bat.