You must log in or register to comment.
Another great example of why proprietary connectors are stupid as hell. I’m going to be upset when my 2DS XL charger breaks and I can’t get an easy replacement.
in this case, apple display connector (adc) predates dvi, so they didn’t really have any other option for supporting an all-digital signal path to an lcd monitor, especially not one that could also power the monitor and provide usb.
this happens a lot with apple proprietary connectors. lightning predated usb-c by almost 5 years, and it was a much better connector than the existing industry standard at the time (usb micro-b). it didn’t really start to feel like a problem until many years later when usb-c started offering most of the same advantages and more.
Then they could have released an open standard instead of creating a proprietary connector.
the adc connector was mostly proprietary in the sense that nobody else used it. third party manufacturers had no problem making adapters and cables without apple’s permission, as evidenced by the the belkin dongle this article is talking about.
what you’re really asking for is an industry standard, which is different from an open standard. however, an industry standard requires the industry as a whole to buy in to it. if they say no, but you still want to solve a problem that their existing standards do not, what do you do?
industry standards also do not typically appear overnight. usually, companies put out multiple solutions trying to solve new problems, and eventually the industry coalesces around a preferred solution. USB was introduced in 1996 with full support for mice and keyboards, but it took nearly a decade to become the de facto connector for mice and keyboards.
I am asking for specifications to be released without patents or have patents signed over to an organization like VESA. Whether it becomes popular or not is another story.
i don’t think adc was encumbered by patents, at least not in any way that prevented other manufacturers from making use of it. it wasn’t locked down behind special handshakes and a certification program like lightning is. it used the same signaling protocol that dvi ended up using, which is why passive adapters like the belkin one above were possible. the additional pins on the connector were used for power and usb. the specifications were freely available, and monitors, gpus, and kvms were released that used the connector in the late '90s and early '00s.
the problem people are haivng is that this connector did not see wide use, so cables and adapters are hard to come by 25 years after the fact.
putting vesa in charge wouldn’t change anything here unless vesa decided to ditch dvi and push this connector instead. however, that probably wouldn’t have happened, because their constituents (most wintel pc makers) would have preferred the cheaper solution of not bundling video, power, and usb in a single cable.
i don’t think adc was encumbered by patents
25 years after the fact.
If it were, they’d likely be expired by now.
I wonder if an adapter could be made some “DIY” way, if it needs to be active, it could be a fun project for someone into FPGAs.
It’s incredibly easy to make an adapter. You really only need the female DVI and ADC ports (you could probably sacrifice a few cables if you can’t get the connectors, too), a breadboard and some wire. https://lookanotherblog.com/diy-adc-adapter/
the adapter is passive since both connectors use the same signaling protocol
the problem is that designing tooling to manufacture a custom connector at scale is expensive, so nobody is going to do that until they know there is enough demand to at least cover the upfront cost of designing that tooling and manufacturing a bunch of these.
You’re missing the point that if Apple had just given it to VESA, it would have become the de-facto standard instead of DVI because other companies would rather reuse ADC than design DVI from scratch.
i think i laid out exactly why that most likely wouldn’t have happened
i don’t think there is any reason vesa couldn’t have adopted it if they wanted, the connectors are already extremely similar. the problem is they didn’t want a connector that also handles power and usb, because that would have raised costs for pc manufacturers
ADC is incredibly inconvientient, because it doesn’t support hotplugging. It also requires the computer to contain a power supply for the screen.
They did, it’s called USB-C. Apple was heavily involved in the development of USC-C.
Luckily they are popular enough that you can get pretty inexpensive cables that allow USB charging.
Where? I haven’t been able to find it
Really? If you just look up “3DS USB charging cable” on a popular jungle themed online retailer it comes up with loads of them. Sure you can find the same on AliExpress or eBay.
And yes yours uses the same cables/charger as the 3DS.
Thankfully, at least recently, most devices have settled on only a few standards. And some older devices can be modded to work with newer ports. I know rhere are some mods to add a usb-c port to the 2ds, and from what I understand they’re not too difficult to do.
Also thanks to the EU forcing the manufacturers (of smartphones at least) to go for the same standard
The newest law covers pretty much everything one could think of being powered by usb, and more, especially now that with usb-c it can deliver higher voltages and currents, not just 5V/2A.
Yes. I have and will be doing type C conversions a lot.
Aren’t those cables available in quantities though?
They are for now
That’s the most hipster headline I’ve ever read. And on brand for Apple/Mac’s to have a dongle issue…
This is sad in many levels.
I bet Fry’s Electronics had a warehouse full of these things. Just have to figure out where they ended up when they went out of business.
Time to start searching Ollie’s and Big Lots.
Aside from the first-gen Power Macs, which used NuBus, Power Macs generally had PCI slots.
The guy with a Power Mac G4 in the article definitely has PCI slots.
Can probably just put an old video card in the thing.
googles
Yeah.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7937922
Alternately, you could go with an older, slower, possibly cheaper PCI video card as well. You could use a PCI video in combination with the AGP card. Not sure if the AGP card is missing, if you can run with a PCI video only.
ATI made a couple of PCI Radeon cards for Mac, 7000 and 9200, I think, with VGA & DVI outputs. Might be hard to find these days.
I had a radeon 7000 PCI card back in the day, it was a steaming pile.
Couldn’t someone just remake it or is it still protected with some corpo patenting bullshit?
It’s not worth the cost. There aren’t enough 20+ year old macs in the wild who need to connect to a DVI monitor to make the assembly commercially viable after tooling costs.
Though it’s a very good representation of why non-standard connection schemes are a terrible idea. I would say that outlawing black mock turtlenecks would be an appropriate punishment, given that Steve Jobs is dead and we can’t kill him a second time. But that would also seem unfair as it would mean we would have to all see Panos Panay shirtless all the time. That just punishes the rest of us.
In another post on those topic a commenter revealed that it’s quite easy to assemble one from basic cables that are cheaply available. It’s just a matter of splicing and re sealing.
While my VGA card from 1990 had the 15 pin connector, still present on 2023 monitors
They’re getting rare, though. Certainly no longer the standard video connector they were 10 years ago.
They can certainly be found, but I don’t know how long for.
True, now it’s HDMI everywhere, but I’d prefer DisplayPort maybe
Neat, I have 6 of those in a drawer.
And two of the active (powered) adc to vga converters
And 3 or 4 old ADC monitors.
How big is your drawer? 0.o
I’ve got like 5 of the original Apple ones in storage… I’m guessing they’re actually worth something?
