Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ono ( ono@lemmy.ca )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago

Google Decides To Pull Up The Ladder On The Open Internet, Pushes For Unconstitutional Regulatory Proposals

www.techdirt.com

external-link
message-square
50
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technews@radiation.party
  • hackernews@derp.foo
283
external-link

Google Decides To Pull Up The Ladder On The Open Internet, Pushes For Unconstitutional Regulatory Proposals

www.techdirt.com

ono ( ono@lemmy.ca )  to TechnologyEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
50
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technews@radiation.party
  • hackernews@derp.foo
It’s pretty much the way of the world: beyond the basic enshittification story that has been so well told over the past year or so about how companies get worse and worse as they get more and more …
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • sunbeam60 ( sunbeam60@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    All companies want open standards and regulation of the big players when they’re small. All companies want high barriers to entry and regulation of the small players when they’re big.

    All companies want what is best for them. In that matter, they differ very little from people.

    • beeng ( beeng@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 years ago

      Corporations are people didn’t you know?

      • sunbeam60 ( sunbeam60@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        Not in the country I live, luckily.

        • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          Don’t worry. The US will fix that.

          • reric88🧩 ( reric88@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 years ago

            America, fk yeah, coming again to save the mother fkn day, yeah

          • sunbeam60 ( sunbeam60@lemmy.one ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Huh?

  • jherazob ( jherazob@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is the year of enshittification, isn’t it? Damn every company has pushed the pedal to the metal on it

    • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      The cat’s out of the bag. Gotta grab everything before folks try to stop them.

    • tVxUHF ( tVxUHF@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s because interest rates went up and the free VC money tap was turned off so all these companies have to actually turn a profit, so they’re squeezing us with every lever they control.

    • Toribor ( Toribor@corndog.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      It definitely feels like a transition period for the whole Internet. Tech platforms finally reached their maximum user potential and scale, so now it’s time to turn the screws.

      They all think we need them, so now we figure out if they’re right.

      • grooving ( grooving@lemmy.studio ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        They weren’t. Source: time traveler from the future

  • Beej Jorgensen ( beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 years ago

    I used to give Google money for services (Drive and YouTube), but I’ve already stopped doing that because of their evil ways. This just hammers it home that much more.

    Edit: The shitty part is what a cool company it used to be. And to watch it destroy itself like this is just sad.

    • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is my biggest complaint. They were the best way to access the sum of all human knowledge. Now I NEVER find things relevant to my search, just things that can be sold to me. Things like the “-“ character no longer work. I still get the excluded term in top results. It garbage now and everyone at google is to blame not just the executives.

      • Beej Jorgensen ( beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        I took my money from YouTube and started giving it to Kagi. 🙂👍

    • DeadGemini ( DeadGemini@lemmy.studio ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • Beej Jorgensen ( beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Might get there. Right now I just have external SSH access (key only) to get to the files. I also need an offsite, so it’s all sent to a remote server with rsync and gocryptfs. I only have about 90 GB of stuff on there right now; I don’t do any media serving.

        • DeadGemini ( DeadGemini@lemmy.studio ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • Beej Jorgensen ( beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            For sure–I just don’t tend to watch anything more than once. :) Most of my federated identity and offsites are at SDF, which is a solid place with a mission I respect and certainly don’t mind giving $36/year to. Grayjay for stupid vids (if I could just get it to work with FCast…)

  • Computerchairgeneral ( Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 years ago

    Honestly, this is about what I expect from Google nowadays. It’s surprising when they manage to live up to the “Don’t be Evil” motto they used to have.

    • Luke_Fartnocker ( Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 years ago

      There’s a reason they got rid of that motto.

      • dan ( dan@upvote.au ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        They never got rid of it though. I don’t understand why people keep repeating this. See the final paragraph here: https://abc.xyz/investor/google-code-of-conduct/

        • Adanisi ( Adanisi@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          They might as well have though 🙃

          • ɔiƚoxɘup ( Quexotic@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 years ago

            don’t be evil and if you see something, speak up

            https://duckduckgo.com/?q=google+whistleblower+fired

            Oh really Google?

            • Jummit ( Jummit@lemmy.one ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              It’s double speak. The translation is “We are evil and if you say something about what you see, we will silence you.”.

              • Luke_Fartnocker ( Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                Wait, that’s the government’s stance also.

                • Jummit ( Jummit@lemmy.one ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Are you beginning to see things more clearly now?

            • Beej Jorgensen ( beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Depends on your definition of “evil”, I guess.

              • ɔiƚoxɘup ( Quexotic@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                Lol, right? Bit of a slippery slope over at the ol search and advertising factory.

        • Omniraptor ( Omniraptor@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • dan ( dan@upvote.au ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Sure, that’s different to totally removing it though.

        • Luke_Fartnocker ( Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          I heard several news stories stating that they had, but I guess that’s my fault for believing the news. I just assumed they would get something right eventually.

    • arthur ( arthur@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Expect this and they killing some of their products.

  • bedrooms ( bedrooms@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s-not-corruption-if-it’s-law approach?

    • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s a form of regulatory capture and is taught is all business schools.

      • Gsus4 ( Gsus4@feddit.nl ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        At this point what they learn in business schools is the full bestiary of legal and illegal tricks and scams you can use to extract money from us cattle and contribute as little as possible to the upkeep :(

  • Jeremy [Iowa] ( jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 years ago

    Regulatory capture seems about on par for Google these days. I suppose I’ll be switching back to OnePlus for Android devices; that’ll be about it for Google stuff in my home.

    • teawrecks ( teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 years ago

      Assume that all devices ship with spyware

      • Jeremy [Iowa] ( jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        Suddenly, I miss the old days of Android. I suppose it’s back to CyanogenMod or whatever it is these days

        • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          3 years ago

          GrapheneOS

          • boonhet ( boonhet@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            Direct replacement for Cyanogen would be Lineage. There are dozens of decent ROMs to try though.

            I still opted for iOS in the end. As much shit as Apple pulls, they did 6 year software updates when only flagship Androids got 3 and they aren’t generally trying to dominate the Internet.

            • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              3 years ago

              Nobody outside a select few know the real dirt inside the proprietary code that Apple puts out. Open source is the only truth that you can see for yourself. Apple is the antithesis of open source.

              • winky88 ( winky88@startrek.website ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 years ago

                Open source is only as useful as the contributors and reviewers. Finding things after the fact helps noone.

                People need to stop revering open source as the solution to humanity’s problems and treat it as a useful tool, nothing more.

                • sadreality ( sadreality@kbin.social ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  You are correct it is only a tool, sadly it is the only viable tool tho

                • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  You’re right.

                  I like to peruse code and have read a lot of it from the sources that make it available. It’s not always the languages I know but even then I can get the idea of what most of it is doing. There are some code bases that are too big for any one person to fully comprehend. That said, I think the only way for one to be confident in open source is to read it yourself which is a problem for most as coding knowledge is not common combine with the size of some.

                  So it’s always going to be trusting trust for most people. The fact that it is open source and makes available the code for review limits malice to a much greater degree than proprietary ever will.

              • boonhet ( boonhet@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                I know, but as a software engineer, I just hate reading through other people’s code and I don’t have time for tinkering anymore. Apple’s ecosystem is convenient for me and that matters more now. Used to care more of course.

          • BCsven ( BCsven@lemmy.ca ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Running it now it is great.

            • felbane ( felbane@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              Unfortunately you still have to give Google money to run Graphene unless you already have a compatible Pixel phone.

              • Siddhartha-Aurelius ( Siddhartha-Aurelius@kbin.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yes and no. Buy a used pixel phone and don’t give google a dime on the new pixel that is not fully supported yet.

              • BCsven ( BCsven@lemmy.ca ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                I dont mind giving a company money for a product, then the transaction ends . What i don"t want is to buy a car then have the car sell my daily location to people.

        • Adanisi ( Adanisi@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 years ago

          Lineage

  • Nollij ( Nollij@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Everyone seems to be missing an obvious detail- there was a related and even more dangerous piece of legislation reintroduced recently. It’s known as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), and that would have immense impacts on Google’s (specifically, YouTube’s) operations.

    This is an example of them trying to claim the other bill isn’t needed, because they can self-regulate. You’ll notice how this also purports to protect kids, but in a way that is much easier and cheaper for Google to implement.

    • vriska1 ( vriska1@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Its deeply worrying development seeing Google came out with the narrative saying they are against mandated age verification while secretly saying they do support it atleast that what I get from this article.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 199 users / day
  • 1.26K users / week
  • 2.23K users / month
  • 5.31K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.6K subscribers
  • 6.38K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code