lalo ( @lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ) 4•8 months agoThere is a difference between accidental deaths and intentional killing. Veganism is about stopping animal exploitation as far as possible and practicable.
Accidentally killing an animal and eating their flesh is something completely different to deliberately killing an animal and eating them.
If you happen to find a dead animal and eat it, you are not exploiting them for their life, just their dead remains.
Moobythegoldensock ( @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee ) English40•8 months agoYes.
Rationale?
Moobythegoldensock ( @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee ) English62•8 months agoVenus fly traps are not animals.
But they eat animals.
Fungi are more closely related to animals than plants. Are they vegan?
Moobythegoldensock ( @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee ) English48•8 months agoI think you need to look up the definition of of “vegan.” It’s not based on what your food eats: you can’t call eating a grass-fed cow “vegan.”
Fungi is also not animals.
agitatedpotato ( @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 6•8 months agoIf a plant has to eat animals to survive then that plant is a product of animal suffering. Thats why vegans don’t drink milk or eat eggs too. So if that’s the definition of vegan that someone subscibes to then the flytrap is not Vegan.
Moobythegoldensock ( @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee ) English7•8 months agoThat’s not the definition of vegan. The definition of vegan is a person who abstains from animal products. Plants are not animal products.
Eating a venus flytrap is also removing a plant that eats animals.
agitatedpotato ( @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 5•8 months agoThere are plenty of vegans who would tell you they abstain from any products of animal suffering, otherwise they would use products that were tested on animals. Just because you test lipstick on animals, doesn’t make the lipstick a product of animals, its a product of animal suffering. Your definition is not the only one and doesn’t exclude animal tested products, which many vegans go out of their way to avoid.
rwhitisissle ( @rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml ) 1•8 months agoVegans also don’t eat honey, which is not really a byproduct of animal suffering. And a vegan also wouldn’t eat eggs, even if they kept and raised their own free range chickens who were laying unfertilized eggs which were just going to rot if not consumed. Because veganism isn’t about the “suffering” of an animal. You could genetically engineer an animal that was incapable of feeling pain or fear and made it so that it felt ecstasy while being butchered, but killing and eating it would still be unethical for a person to do, and still be in violation of veganism’s core principles, because it’s about conscious beings exploiting the labor or nature of animals without their consent. An animal like a wolf or lion (or in this case a venus fly trap) eating meat is not “unethical” because it exists outside of ethics: it’s just a component of an ecosystem in which predation is a natural element. Humans have functionally removed themselves from whatever ecosystem they evolved to be a part of, so our exploitation of animals and their natural behaviors is just that: exploitative.
hallettj ( @hallettj@beehaw.org ) English7•8 months agoFungi are more closely related to animals than plants.
I bring this up too. What my kid asks, “what is vegan?”, and my wife says, “someone who eats plants”, then I shout from across the room, “and fungi!” Tbh no one is amused but me.
There’s nothing hypocritical about eating fungi! I just want recognition for the fungal contribution.
lauha ( @lauha@lemmy.one ) 3•8 months agoVenus flytrap are plants. Simple as that.
chaorace ( @chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org ) English37•8 months agoI’ll answer your question with another question: is it Vegan to eat bacon made from a pig you personally raised up from birth after it dies naturally having lived a full life?
If you define Veganism as a diet, then bacon’s bacon. If you define Veganism as a personal reaction to the cruelty of industrial farms, then perhaps this is how you get Vegan bacon. If you define Veganism as something more spiritual, then perhaps desecrating your dear friend’s corpse by eating it is even worse.
PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) English2•8 months agoExpecting me to believe that you didn’t have any ultieror motives in raising the pig you intend to eat is like convincing me your adult daughter consents to sex with you. Is it theoretically possible? Sure. Do I trust ANYONE enough to make that call in complete honesty? No. So it’s not vegan.
Susaga ( @Susaga@ttrpg.network ) English19•8 months agoI would say yes. Plants feed off of the bodies of dead lions according to this animated documentary I saw, and that doesn’t make them any less vegan. Then again, I’m not a vegan, so I might be entirely wrong.
But Scavengers feed off dead bodies too. Is Hyena vegan? What about crow?
Susaga ( @Susaga@ttrpg.network ) English10•8 months agoFeeding off of dead bodies isn’t what makes it vegan or not. Plants are plants and animals are not, regardless of their diet.
Or are you trying to argue that grass isn’t vegan?
No, more that animals are harmed in the growth of a fly trap.
tofuwabohu ( @tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net ) 9•8 months agoAnimals are harmed in industrial farming as well. It sucks, but doesn’t make wheat not being vegan.
Your double negative is throwing me for a loop.
I also don’t get the jump from industrial Ag and wheat.
Can you word your point differently?
tofuwabohu ( @tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net ) 6•8 months agoWheat is vegan, even if animals are harmed in the process of growing and harvesting it (pesticides, rodents in combine harvesters).
Venus fly traps are vegan, even if they harmed flies.
What if the meat was harvested in a humane manner? Nitrogen asphyxiation, for instance, which is being trialed for use on humans wishing to commit suicide?
I’m not debating the merits current meat harvesting; on an industrial scale it’s abhorrent. I’m just mostly wanting to know where the line is drawn
In my case I point out above, the only real differences is that humans have a choice and animals would not (this is a big one, I will grant you) and what is ultimately consumed.
anarchost ( @anarchost@lemm.ee ) 9•8 months agoThat’s an easy one: no, because they are animals.
lorez ( @lorez@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoAnd what’s a human being? A mineral?
anarchost ( @anarchost@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoBesides being cannibalism, I’m pretty sure all vegans would tell you that humans have sentience greater than, if not on par with, the average animal. So eating one would not be vegan
lorez ( @lorez@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoHumans overrate themselves.
anarchost ( @anarchost@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoThen they overate veganism first and foremost
lorez ( @lorez@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoI’m replying here cos I can’t find the comment you posted: I see humans as worthwhile as any other species but boy do we overrate ourselves. We’re the most important creature, the animal that has to be better than all the rest. We’d go without eating if that were possible. In the end what we do doesn’t matter much. Life keeps on going where it can and the spheres keep turning around.
hallettj ( @hallettj@beehaw.org ) English15•8 months agoMaybe a better case study would be figs since people actually eat those. From what I’m seeing in search results there is some difference of opinion, but maybe the prevailing opinion is that figs are fine for vegans because they are not intentionally exploitative or cruel to animals.
TheButtonJustSpins ( @TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub ) English5•8 months agoI’m not vegan but I won’t eat figs because of what you’re touching on here. (I just find it gross.)
drcouzelis ( @drcouzelis@lemmy.zip ) English4•8 months agoI just did an Internet search. Today I learned. Still not sure I wish I did. 😶
lalo ( @lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ) 4•8 months agoLook up cochineal and you’ll stop eating lots of red/pink food coloring as well.
intensely_human ( @intensely_human@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoIt’s fucking bizarre is what it is. It’s like something out of Prometheus.
PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) English2•8 months agoFigs and wasps are in a mutually beneficial relationship. Fly traps kill flies. Veganism is about suffering.
otter ( @otter@lemmy.zip ) English13•8 months agoI can’t breathe from laughing at this.
stolid_agnostic ( @stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml ) 11•8 months agoYes. They aren’t digesting meat, they are absorbing potassium and fixed nitrogen. The plant cells are, well, plant cells.
agitatedpotato ( @agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 9•8 months agoIf the plant is carnivorous are it’s cells not the product of animal suffering?
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 6•8 months agoWell, the definition of being vegan is eating plants only. The part about animal sufffering is a justification of being vegan.
Kaijobu ( @Kaijobu@discuss.tchncs.de ) 6•8 months agoWell, to be more precise, vegan stands for the lack of an animal’s influence in a product. This distinction is important as mushrooms/fungi are not categorised as simple plants, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts and so on.
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 2•8 months agoCorrect. If it’s not an animal product (as in, meat or an animal byproduct lile milk and eggs), it’s vegan.
lalo ( @lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•8 months agoLack on animal exploitation*. If you find a dead animal while dumpster diving or a roadkill and you bring home to eat, it’s vegan because you’re not contributing to the exploitation of living sentient beings.
dylanmorgan ( @dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net ) 5•8 months agoI would argue that roadkill is a product of human exploitation of the environment as a whole, so roadkill isn’t vegan.
Also, if roadkill is vegan you know you’re going to get some psycho with a massive cow catcher on the front of his pickup who’s “vegan” because he only eats what he runs down in his truck.
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 2•8 months agoWrong. Vegans can’t consume meat or animal products. This entire exploitation thing is only a justification.
lalo ( @lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ) 3•8 months agoBy that definition, animal testing is vegan as long as the end result doesn’t contain an animal product, which is not. Veganism is about not exploiting animals as far as possible and practicable.
Cultured meats will be vegan, accidental roadkill is vegan, as well as dumpster diving, because you’re not exploiting living sentient beings for that.
You can check out more info on the history of veganism: https://www.vegansociety.com/about-us/history
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 2•8 months agoBro is arguing with the fucking dictionary, I can’t even… I don’t know what to say. I just want to say you’re kinda reaffirming some stereotypes about vegans and I’ll end it at that.
lalo ( @lalo@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•8 months agoNo need to be pedantic. I’m pointing you to the Vegan Society, who actually created the term vegan. I’m merely trying to educate you on the topic. The dictionary definition is simplifying an entire philosophy, otherwise vegans would also be okay with horse and dog races, horseback riding, using animals as labor and other forms of animal exploitation.
Quote of the important part of the article (highlights by me):
The word vegan was coined by Donald Watson from a suggestion by early members Mr George A. Henderson and his wife Fay K. Henderson that the society should be called Allvega and the magazine Allvegan.
Although the vegan diet was defined early on it was as late as 1949 before Leslie J Cross pointed out that the society lacked a definition of veganism and he suggested “[t]he principle of the emancipation of animals from exploitation by man”. This is later clarified as “to seek an end to the use of animals by man for food, commodities, work, hunting, vivisection, and by all other uses involving exploitation of animal life by man”.
Floey ( @Floey@lemm.ee ) 2•8 months agoThat’s not the definition of veganism at all. It’s actually not even the definition of a plant based diet since plant based dieters eat fungi and yeast.
theshatterstone54 ( @theshatterstone54@feddit.uk ) 2•8 months agoYeah, they can eat mushrooms and other fungi. I should have picked my words better.
Also, dictionary definition:
Floey ( @Floey@lemm.ee ) 1•8 months agoOr use is important here. Veganism isn’t a diet, the way vegan eat follows from vegan ethics, which apply to more then just what we put in our mouths.
Floey ( @Floey@lemm.ee ) 6•8 months agoIf the VFT was grown for human purposes such as eating then no it would not be vegan, as they require a small but steady stream of bugs to grow. Though if you found a feed alternative like a nutrient pill then I guess it could be vegan. As for a VFT found in the wild then yes it would be vegan, anything it has consumed in the past wasn’t done so for your sake.
anarchost ( @anarchost@lemm.ee ) 5•8 months agoEdit: thank you for all the thoughtful replies from the people who downvoted but left an explanation!
The more I think about this question, the more complexities it creates. I am not a vegan, so I can only guess what the average vegan would think…
- If you eat a plant that causes harm to a living being like an insect, are you doing a moral good from a vegan perspective because you are reducing harm?
- Would it be morally good for a vegan to use vegan means to prevent more harm to animals?
- Would it be the ultimate moral good for vegans to hunt down every wild Venus flytrap and consume them?
- What if the Venus flytrap only ate insects that significantly harmed animal or human populations by spreading diseases?
- If vegans could alter the environment using non-vegan means, in such a way that bats stopped eating mosquitoes without upsetting the overall ecosystem, but these mosquitoes started spreading a terrible but non-deadly disease in humans, would it be moral for them to do so, or would it be immoral for them to avoid it?
Unfortunately, I don’t know the calculus a vegan uses when placing value on the life of a human versus an animal, so the bat mosquito thing is entirely up in the air for me up in the air for me
PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) English1•8 months agoGenetically engineering the disease in the saliva of the lone star tick so that it’s sexually transmissible between humans is vegan.
PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES ( @PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt ) English5•8 months agoITT: people misunderstanding the difference between vegetarianism and veganism
Here’s the quick version: Vegetarians don’t eat animals. Vegans don’t eat stuff made of animal suffering.
Fly traps are made of animal suffering.
fmstrat ( @fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ) English4•8 months agoIs murdering a murderer who plans to murder again murder?
I imagine there is gray in veganism, as with all philosophical life choices.
TheButtonJustSpins ( @TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub ) English10•8 months agoIf you murder a murderer, the number of murderers in the world stays the same.
So you should murder at least two. johnyrocket ( @johnyrocket@feddit.ch ) 1•8 months agoWell I hope those plants taste as good as they smell to flies…
intensely_human ( @intensely_human@lemm.ee ) 5•8 months agoI’ve taken some high school algebra so let’s see how I can analyze this.
- Is murdering a murderer who plans to murder again murder?
- Is murdering X murder
- Murdering X = murder
- Is murder murder?
- Yes
bionicjoey ( @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca ) 3•8 months agoI feel like whatever the answer is, it has to be the same as “is eating mushrooms vegan?”
CrimeDad ( @CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work ) English3•8 months agoA Venus flytrap cannot consent to being eaten, so no.
TheButtonJustSpins ( @TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub ) English14•8 months agoWhat? Plants don’t consent to being eaten. In fact, under this logic only cannibalism can be vegan.
CrimeDad ( @CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work ) English3•8 months agoCorrect.