G/O Media, a major online media company that runs publications including Gizmodo, Kotaku, Quartz, Jezebel, and Deadspin, has announced that it will begin a “modest test” of AI content on its sites.

…

The trial will include “producing just a handful of stories for most of our sites that are basically built around lists and data,” Brown wrote. “These features aren’t replacing work currently being done by writers and editors, and we hope that over time if we get these forms of content right and produced at scale, AI will, via search and promotion, help us grow our audience.”

  • Meloku ( Meloku@feddit.cl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 years ago

    What all these trend chasing CEOs fail to grasp about ChatGPT is that the Neural Network is trained to return what looks like like a human written answer, but it is NOT, IN ANY CASE, GOING TO RETURN INFORMATION. If you ask ChatGPT to write an essay with sources, ChatGPT is going to write a somewhat coherent essay with what looks like sources, but it’s going to be a crapshot if the sources are even real, because you asked for an essay with sources, not an essay USING any given source. Anyways, I’m going to heat some popcorn and wait for the inevitable fake articles and the associated debacle.

    • ChatGPT is an engineering marvel in that it has understood the semantics of language. However, it has absolutely no idea what it is talking about beyond generating the next token in a string of what sounds like natural language. I wish more people would understand this nuance.

      • rwhitisissle ( rwhitisissle@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s frightening how many people fail to realize this. I’ve had to explain to people that I consider to be reasonably intelligent that ChatGPT is not, in fact, a “truly sentient AI.” If you ask it to explain how refrigerators work, it probably can, but it also has literally no fucking clue what a refrigerator is or what any of the words in the sentences it generates truly “mean” in the same sense that you understand and comprehend language.

    • TMoney ( TMoney@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you’ve seen articles most news agencies put out besides a select, high-quality few, I doubt anyone will be able to tell the difference. They’re all shit. They’re probably just switching from mechanical turk to this.

      • It can be a very good tool for searching. One of my most common questions to GPT-4 are “<insert long rambly description of some vague idea I’ve heard of> Does this have a name?” and then it’ll tell me and I can search for that in a real search engine

    • TheDom ( TheDom@lemmynsfw.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      People won’t get this through their brains for some reason. Even the (slightly more) tech inclined here use chatGPT to answer askLemmy posts as if the ai knew anything