Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fer0n ( fer0n@lemm.ee )  to Technology · 3 years ago

Signal tests usernames so you can avoid sharing your phone number

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
39
link
fedilink
271
external-link

Signal tests usernames so you can avoid sharing your phone number

www.theverge.com

fer0n ( fer0n@lemm.ee )  to Technology · 3 years ago
message-square
39
link
fedilink
Ahead of an expected launch next year.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • brothershamus ( brothershamus@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 years ago

    YES! The one main hurdle I’ve found (and the constant “share your contacts??” prompting). Good luck to them!

    • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • conciselyverbose ( conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Because my contacts are none of their business, and it’s fucking disgusting to even ask without the user going way out of their way to initiate it.

        • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • conciselyverbose ( conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            There isn’t a single service on the planet who I would trust to allow their app to see my contacts.

            The app asking for the permission is not acceptable. The permission should not exist at all. Both mobile OS should only be permitting users to explicitly import contacts that they choose, with literally no way for any app to see the master list in any context.

            • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • conciselyverbose ( conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                The mere existence of the permission is obscene.

                • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  deleted by creator

      • brothershamus ( brothershamus@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Why not? Uh, No. That’s why. Not now, not the 100th time, not ever. I want it to stop asking. No.

        • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

  • christophski ( christophski@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 years ago

    Now if only my people I knew used signal instead of WhatsApp 🤦‍♀️

    • yoz ( yoz@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yea they will only move if WhatsApp fucks something badly.

      • krimsonbun ( krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        they’re planning on adding ads

    • onlinepersona ( onlinepersona@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Imagine having to send people your username instead of them just installing Signal and knowing you’re there.

  • Hauke ( haukesomm@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nice! Maybe this will also pave the way for multiple accounts on the same device if you have two separate phone numbers for private and work.

    • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Or just use SimpleX (same encryption tech as Signal anyhow).

      • douglasg14b ( douglasg14b@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Hopefully without the toxic devs?

        • schlump ( schlump@feddit.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          What do you mean?

  • Poutinetown ( Poutinetown@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    About time! Hopefully they will find ways to reduce spam though.

    • cooopsspace ( cooopsspace@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      Never had a spam message

      • Poutinetown ( Poutinetown@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I imagine unrestricted usernames would make spam easier than with phone numbers. I’m just hoping they have a way to control this.

        • smeg ( smeg@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            SimpleX has no phone number but I get no spam because only people I send a one-time invite code to can contact me. There is no directory of usernames.

          • Poutinetown ( Poutinetown@lemmy.ca ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Makes sense!

        • loki ( loki@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          they’re going with numbers along with usernames, kinda like discord to reduce spam. I hope they work.

    • rurutheguru ( rurutheguru@lemmings.world ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Where are you receiving these spam messages from? Random numbers aimed at marketing or what?

      • Poutinetown ( Poutinetown@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sorry I misframed it. I mean that since there’s no need to reveal phone numbers, there could be an opportunity for spammers to increase spam by creating many accounts, and Signal should preemptively find ways where such spams could be reduced. However, I realized after posting that the article says we still need to sign up to signal with a phone number. However, there’s still the risk of impersonation (by writing someones username with tiny changes) and people trying to add vulnerable users by username (which they might be using on other platforms) instead of phone number.

        • rurutheguru ( rurutheguru@lemmings.world ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Probably possible yeah, but if the account gets flagged after users reporting it, they’ll need to get a new number afterwards, which isn’t that easy (at least where I live).

    • helenslunch ( helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • /u/stsh ( zeroxmr@monero.town ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    2 hours later… Or years

  • AutoTL;DR ( autotldr@lemmings.world ) B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    Signal is publicly testing letting users add usernames to their accounts so they don’t have to share their phone number to connect via the encrypted messaging service.

    The test was announced via a post on the Signal forums by VP of engineering Jim O’Leary, who referred to the feature as “pre-beta” and warned that there’ll be rough edges including crashes and broken push notifications.

    Although accounts will still be associated with a traditional mobile number at setup, the username feature means you’ll be able to connect with and message other users without having to share what can be an important personally identifiable piece of information.

    PCMag points to a note in the service’s wiki mentioning that signs of the feature cropped up as early as 2019, and Whittaker has been open about the Signal’s plans for it.

    There are indicators that competitor WhatsApp is working on a similar feature, though the Meta-owned messaging service is typically less open about its future development plans.

    But the ease of installing these test clients varies, and you’ll only be able to talk to other users running similar pre-release software.


    Saved 50% of original text.

  • Arthur Besse ( cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    …so you can avoid sharing your phone number with your contacts.

    they are not planning to let you use Signal without having a phone number and sharing it with their (Amazon’s) servers.

  • sculd ( sculd@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    More spam messages then, ok…

    • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      While Signal did justify the need for numbers by cutting spam prevention I don’t get it…

      Spammers use fake phone numbers all the time on the regular phone service so why not on Signal? A few steps too many for them to bother registering?

      • sculd ( sculd@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        A few possible answers:

        1. Signal is not big enough for spammers to spend resources on
        2. People who bothered to use Signal are likely to be more privacy minded and therefore less likely to fall for scam
        • u_tamtam ( u_tamtam@programming.dev ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago
          1. Signal just isn’t as private as its marketing wants you to think it is

          A tip (but you do you, of course), use something federated (XMPP!): the time for trusting a central organization to do no harm is over if you have kept tabs of anything internet over the last 40 years or so…

      • dan ( dan@upvote.au ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Spammers use fake phone numbers all the time on the regular phone service

        The phone calls just use fake caller ID. Caller ID is entirely unauthenticated and the recipient just blindly trusts the sender, so scammers use sketchy VoIP services that let you override the caller ID without actually proving you own that number. Work is being done to improve this: https://www.fcc.gov/call-authentication

        That’s means it’s trivial to use a fake number for outgoing calls, but the spammers can’t actually receive incoming calls or texts to those numbers.

    • cosmic_skillet ( cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      You still need phone number verification to create an account, that hasn’t changed

      • u_tamtam ( u_tamtam@programming.dev ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        So on the privacy front nothing has either. Good to know.

      • DeltaTangoLima ( DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Weirdly, I got a spam message yesterday on Signal. No number - just a username.

        I’m on the regular production version - not the one testing usernames.

  • JokeDeity ( JokeDeity@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    How come the only people I ever meet that use these weird messaging apps are drug dealers and immigrants? 99% of people I meet use Snapchat or Facebook Messenger to talk to people if not SMS, only time I hear about Whatsapp IRL it’s the sketchiest people.

    While I’m on the subject, is the person who designs the Snapchat user interface from this planet? Do they have severe mental deficiencies? It’s really the worst UI of any app or program I’ve ever experienced.

    • Coffee Junky ❤️ ( coffeejunky@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Let me guess American? In Europe basically everyone uses Whatsapp, lots of people use Telegram some use signal. I use all of them.

      • JokeDeity ( JokeDeity@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yep, you are correct.

        • Coffee Junky ❤️ ( coffeejunky@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah when I got my first smartphone and whatsapp wasn’t around yet I had to pay like 10 or 15 cents per sms. So when WhatsApp became an option everybody and their mother jumped ship and joined. For a while sending an sms and getting back I’m on WhatsApp was a thing.

          Nowadays I think sms is basically part of your plan an for most plans unlimited. But they milked it way too hard back in the day. So most people just don’t use it at all.

          • JokeDeity ( JokeDeity@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Wild but now things make a lot more sense, I’ve had unlimited texts for the majority of the time I’ve had a cellphone.

    • HM King Charles III DG FD ( Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      My Girlfriend and I use signal. We don’t talk to anyone else on there. She says it’s simply because she likes how it looks. 🤣

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 131 users / day
  • 818 users / week
  • 2.22K users / month
  • 5.1K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.7K subscribers
  • 6.42K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code