Ive noticed this too on fox. In general the players there are more aggressive than on OGS and IGS. It does happen less often as you move up the ranks in my experience, at least up to 8kyu.

I think fox has much more of a fighting style in its users, so sometimes they become over-aggressive and end up self-destructing lol.

It’s hard to say what the issue is since we are lacking some context. Have you made changes and commits after the commit you are trying to revert, or was that commit the most recent commit in the history?

Same with the fixes you mention, what exactly did you do to fix the merge conflict? Did you manually fix the files with the conflicts? Since you mention being a beginner with git, a common mistake would be not actually going into the files and resolving the conflicts, and just immediately doing git add/rm on the conflicting files.

I’m happy to walk you through the process if you could give a few more details, git can be complicated when you’re a beginner :)

With a name like TrollAccount69, maybe they’re trying to see if you have limited context window :p

(Not that i’m calling you a bot, but this would be funny way to find out if you were)

Best option right now are to use the following protocol extensions

https://wayland.app/protocols/xdg-activation-v1 this extension covers your setting focus needs, but getting a list of other wayland clients is a bit trickier.

https://wayland.app/protocols/ext-foreign-toplevel-list-v1 this extension can list clients in theory, but its missing support for both gnome and kde.

Some of the unstable extensions have wide adoption, so perhaps take a look at each of them to see if they provide the functionality you want. Good luck!

Edit: was curious and did some more digging. KDE has their own protocol extension for this https://wayland.app/protocols/kde-plasma-window-management

As for gnome, I couldn’t find anything that seemed suitable, other than writing a gnome extension specifically to support this. I imagine that doesn’t fit within your vision for your project though.

Anyway, I had fun looking into this. Once again good luck!

Love the message, but personally I won’t use software written by LLMs.

I don’t have a terminal in front of me to double check, but I’m sure you can filter logs with a flag, then set an alias for git log in the repo-local git config to always include that filter

Clearly they were asking for recommendations, so not really a stupid question. I thought your comment was funny until the end, where now it just comes off as incorrectly pedantic.

Well it sounds like you have things back in control with the parental controls gone, so if you haven’t already I would uninstall the play store, and Files by google. You can check out a file manager such as Fossify File Manager as a replacement.

The last part does sound a bit concerning though, you aren’t running an actual FTP server from your phone are you? I would recommend not doing that if you are, as FTP famously doesn’t encrypt traffic. If you need to move files between your phone and a computer, I would recommend using sftp instead and having the sftp server run on your PC.

You can use something termux on android to connect to your pc over ssh, as well as sftp.

~/Scripts for any bash or python scripts
~/Gits for any repos I clone
~/Projects for any projects im working on (not organized by programming language, but I do have some dirs called zig, go, etc., for when im learning a new language and want to make some projects for learning purposes)

Most other files go into ~/Documents if they don’t have a home already, or don’t fit into the above directories

“ChatGPT, write a ragebait rant about how everyone should just use mpv instead of jellyfin.”

I wouldn’t be surprised if I even nailed the wording of the prompt.

I understood what you meant, I was just pointing out that what you said was incorrect. Even in your reply you said

I compress my files with the compression that encrypts it.

Which is still not entirely correct. The compression is not doing any encrypting. They are two separate processes that the tool you are using is presenting as a single step for convenience. You seem to know what you are talking about, and I happen to know about cryptography, but as someone else in the thread mentioned not everyone knows how these things work. If we are trying to spread knowledge and tips in this community (like your post is doing) then I just saw this as an opportunity to clarify something that was incorrect. Not for your benefit, but for others.

AES-256 is just an encryption algorithm, it doesn’t do any compression on it’s own, so it’s not quite right to say its compressed with it. Really it was compressed, then afterwards encrypted with AES-256.

Performance will likely be really bad running on a live ISO since you are going to likely be bottlenecked by read/write speeds of the usb you have plugged in. I wouldn’t use it to test performance of games.

Happy to hear it! Address conflicts are always a pain, I recently ran into an issue with my VPN to my home network, where my home network and the network I was on shared the same subnet and mask, so I had to specify some custom routes to make it work. Good network design is a must to try and mitigate these things!

Well that doesn’t really indicate any problems with the default gateway. My last bit of troubleshooting advice is to traceroute and see if packets get stuck at the router. And check the firewall logs in pfsense to see if you can find anything there.

Hopefully it ends up being a relatively painless problem to fix!

ok, if you’re fine with doing a little more troubleshooting, I have a few more things to try.

You said before that the systems are able to communicate with each other on the LAN network, just not connect out via WAN. Does this include the pfsense box? That is to say are you able to ping 10.10.10.1 (assuming that’s the IP of the Infra interface on pfsense) from one of you Ubuntu VM’s when it is on the Infra network? Also what is the output of both commands ip -br a and ip route? What I’m am curious about here is maybe the default gateway is not being correctly set when new devices connect to the pfsense. If this ends up being the case, it might be an issue with DHCP (or if you aren’t using DHCP then just the configuration on each Ubuntu VM). I suspect that Windows may be doing some fancy things to figure out on its own some network settings without them being explicitly set.

ok, so to recap just to make sure I have your setup correctly: You Have a Proxmox node with 3 VMs on it: Pfsense, an Ubuntu VM, and another Ubuntu VM. The Proxmox Node has a WAN network (likely a Linux Bridge type interface called vmbr0 or something similar), and a LAN network (another bridge, but with no associated physical interface on the Proxmox host). The last step can differ depending on how exactly you set it up, but the basic idea of having two “networks” is the same. EDIT: You will have two LAN networks as per your original post Your pfsense VM has three Network Devices under the hardware tab, one connected to your WAN network, and the other two connected to your LAN networks.

In Pfsense, you have the appropriate interfaces configured and firewall rules allowing devices on the LAN interface to connect out of the WAN interface (this step in particular has a lot of moving parts)

On each of your Ubuntu VMs, there is just a single Network Device under their hardware tabs, connected to the LAN network. (although right now you say they are connected to the WAN network so you can connect to them from other computers on your home network). Once this is set up correctly, move them back to the LAN network, and maybe set up a rule that allows connections from a single device on your home network. If allowing any device on your home network to connect to your homelab is what you want, then it doesn’t make too much sense having a firewall if you aren’t going to use it ;).

Does this match with your current setup?

Its hard to determine exactly where the issue is coming from, so some more information about the setup would be helpful.

1. Is pfsense on a physical machine with 3 physical network interfaces, or is it virtualized?
2. If you bring down the network interface on the linux box after you do the trick to make the internet work, then bring it back up (as opposed to fully restarting the machine), does the same issue still happen?
3. You mention that you have windows and linux connected to the WAN interface? That doesn’t sound right. In a typical set up, you would have WAN connected to your modem, and LAN connected to your devices. You might want to double check your firewall rules and routing table in pfsense to make sure everything is configured correctly.

In my experience, networking is very prone to small configuration errors, and setting up a homelab is going to force you to learn some great networking skills one way or another :)

I think I read somewhere that the majority of views typically come from videos being recommended on users’ home pages. That is the reason why content creators focus so much on the youtube algorithm, since if their videos don’t get recommended, they don’t get as many views.

(I haven’t watched the linked video, so that may be exactly what they talk about)

You could get an arch based distro and let the distro maintainers handle it. I use EndeavourOS and its been great for the past 3 years