The notion does feel a little cynical. It’s not like this is necessarily always the case and, even if such projects will fundamentally always be an attempt at making money in the hands of large studios, they can be well executed regardless.

It’s an example of the other way around, but as someone who frankly was immune to the notion of nostalgia from it, I recently watched the first Alien movie for the first time and played Alien Isolation afterwards. That was an amazing example of a game that really represented the ambience, notion and feel of the originals without being a carbon copy of it (even if they did rely overmuch on parallels in some parts and the general structure is surely more than inspired).

Though I suppose I must also give the point that I can’t think of an example of the game to movie pipeline that ended well. I’m sure someone will be able to share some positive experience there.

Heya, I have been looking into Fate and have to say, I am somewhere between intense intrigue and confusion. I have already heard of Fate before since I saw people like adapting it to all kinds of general contexts to supply freestyle roleplay with some degree of structure.

Now, as someone who is a DnD Forever DM trying to explore these options, I am feeling a little unsure in regards to how this ends up feeling in actual play. Do you think you have examples of any actual play series where the setting is a High Fantasy one? I looked it up, but I mainly find things in more modern settings, which is fine, but I feel like I’d have an easier time if I saw someone tackle something closer to my goals.

Das Kommentar klang schon recht ernst und definitiv im Kontext angemessen.

It’s not quite that simple. Crowdsourcing has many of the drawbacks that AI has too.

While it can have a higher reliability in detecting nonsensical inputs or inputs that it’s simply unfit in processing, that comes at an intrinsic cost in scalability. Some tasks can’t be effectively crowdsourced for, either because of volume or urgency.

Machine Learning systems learn to approximate decision making and thus can attempt at learning from crowdsourcing efforts. It is notable though that depending on the use case, model and training method, machine learning algorithms can potentially be better than the data it was trained on. Or much worse, it’s very fickle.

It is definitely still the case that crowdsourcing is a really important tool and oftentimes machine learning relies on it’s efforts. And it naturally can solve tasks that we don’t have a viable automated approach for.

Which crossword game is this?

You should contextualise such claims.

Sadly this doesn’t work if one of the parties is threatening to do all they can to break down the democracy before you get your chance to see the results at the next vote.

Something about that airship idea tickles my memories of playing Final Fantasy, so I can’t say no to that. It’s also something that would certainly garner massive favour, while not making the characters feel overly powerful beyond reason. Especially once the airship has plenty of limitations for being a prototype it’s fully under DM control and still feels incredibly cool, I imagine.

Thanks for the idea, I think it’s really shaping up.

That is an excellent idea. Together with the other stuff I read here, I think I know what to go for. I love the idea of the character trying to garner favour with the idol only to end up being ripped off when he is on the path to his grand goal. Thanks a lot for the idea!

I agree with your statements, I’ve made the mistake of pre planning too much before.

What concerns me more is having a plan on how to set his character up for that journey of creating such an item. When they say legendary, they mean an item that would become renowned for having been created, maybe not necessarily truly legendary. The characters primary motivation is to prove themselves the equal of their long-standing idol artificer.

I guess what bothers me is the fact that I have a thorough idea for engaging character quests for all the other players. I have thought of personal storylines that each player gets to explore that will lead their character along some plot line based on their backstory. It’s only the artificer that I can’t think of something overly compelling for.

The claim that tensions between those holding power in the capitalist system and the growing communist forces caused the second world war is a pretty hot take as someone who grew up in Germany. Do you have sources on professional dissemination of the facts that arrives at this conclusion? I’m genuinely curious because I hadn’t heard of that interpretation yet.

My first leveled Tank was Gunbreaker, my first leveled DPS was Mechanist and I am myself now working on Sage to fill out my “shoot guns at it to solve your problem” Trifecta.

I find it unrealistic to not believe that a future in which we must not necessarily work a large part of our time to gain a living is possible, but believe that somehow you can halt the progress of technology. Instead of directing the outrage against your government and making them acknowledge that before too long automation will make any form of large scale employed a mere farce, you’d rather hope that corporations would be nice and not employ AI generated artwork to make their images.

This technology is on its way to benefit everyone unless you allow it to be monopolised by those who wish to do so. AI empowers their users to do what could have only been done by many people together before, for prizes that are relatively negligible. The fact that AI uses other people’s art as input doesn’t mean it just repackages other people’s content. That’s the same as saying that normal artists are just repackaging other people’s content because they learned by looking at the art of other people and seeing what works.

The learning process employed in Machine Learning and the learning process that humans engage in is not fundamentally different. While it might not be the exact same set of mechanisms, in the end it just boils down to seeing what works and making things similar to that. That’s what humans already do.

The model trained on all the data, if well trained, does not contain the data to reconstruct any of the images used to make it

Something that may be relevent is the application of completely self learned models. If an AI were to be able to learn making art without using human art (just human input on the quality and tagging of created pieces) would you feel better about that replacing artists? Because that is certainly something we will see in the future too. Back in the day when AI started beating the best Go players in the world the critique had been that it hasn’t surpassed humans in skill, as it has learned from humans to be so good. So they made a version that only learned by playing against itself with no human input at all. There’s nothing stopping art to be created in a similar way, as long humans give the input on what they like and what they don’t.

I don’t believe that the joy one feels during the creation of a piece of art necessarily is relevant to the qualities of the artwork. From the perspective of the end user, the artwork may look exactly the same, be it made by a person or AI (even if it had to be more advanced than what we have right now).

It is true that it would be a pity if the joy of self expression vanished as artists lost their ability to create art, but AI won’t cause this. It will simply remove the ability to be paid for it and making something into your job tends to suck the joy from it more than it adds it.

The only shot there really is for artists is a future in which they don’t need to work for a living and if that isn’t a possibility then their chances are already gone in the long term. I’m not saying I’d enjoy any of that. But there is no reasonable future in which this technology isn’t expanded and the industry refuses to use the incredibly improved methods of creating art.

Beyond that, you would be taking away the right of new groups of people to express themselves. People already are gaining access to a fork of expression they never had before through AI. Why do they not get the right to use AI in things they create? Even if it’s as the basis for their own work or even if it’s already the finished product.

What the AI does to create the model which is used to generate artworks based on prompts is not fundamentally different from what humans do when they learn in general. Humans see examples of things and synthesize the idea of what makes up these things. While machine learning models aren’t exactly mimicking the human learning process, there isn’t magic involved in either and both do nothing but reprocess what they have been given as an input. Humans are no more original than that.

Why do these artists being replaced have a right to make money with their art? Why didn’t all the other professions that became obsolete through technological advancement have the same right?

Were cars invented with the aim to make wagon makers obsolete? Were cameras invented to make realistic painters obsolete? They were both, just as all other things, invented because they do something that people want to happen in a way that is easier and more accessible.

Why don’t I have a right to have easily affordable art in my works and express myself in a way that I couldn’t because I can’t afford to hire an expensive artist or learn to make it myself through many hours of work?

And how are other artists not profiting off of artist’s efforts by learning from their art and replicating styles, techniques and other such things?

Why are you not instead angry at the fact that an artist even has to make money to do what they want? Why aren’t you angry at the fact that anyone has to turn their passions into labour to survive?

If you don’t feel like people should be able to make a living off of not working at all, how do you suppose humanity shall move forward in an environment in which anything is starting to be automated? Should be half technological advancement now and forever, fighting tooth and nail against progress? Or should we accept what is inevitable at this point and focus on creating a society in which the common person still has a place?

That all sounds really dramatic and escalating, but many people approach this problem from an emotional position. No one has the right to make money from anything they do. No constitution in the world grants such a right. Making money isn’t considered a human need in general. What I do agree with is that artists should be able to live their life and make art. That’s what you should desire and fight for.

This is horribly backwards thinking. This is the same kind of opposition to technological advancement that has been common with any leap forward.

What you should he angry at isn’t that the work can be done more easily and more readily accessibly, but that the artists that may suffer from lower demand will suffer from it, rather than being able to make art for their own pleasure. Don’t fight what is not a problem.

I especially like the idea of a form-changing enemy. That is already giving me ideas to create interesting enemies that can effectively just repurpose existing statblocks into this type of enemy. Maybe an enemy that can change quite liberally like with a reaction and has different kinds of immunities might be quite interesting.