It seems problematic to have a poll to about boycotting when those actively boycotting won’t be there to participate.
It seems problematic to have a poll to about boycotting when those actively boycotting won’t be there to participate.
For posterity, would you explain what you don’t like?
I like it and was able to adapt easily, but some of the UI is terrible (and I mean this in a constructive way), specifically:
But, the discussion seems good, the actual UI is reminiscent of old reddit so I’m happy, and I’m surprised how easy it is to discuss things across instances.
Enjoy Montreal! I went a few years ago and it was a very fun weekend.
Scrape, tighten screw, putty, scrape, paint with brush.
It didn’t look like much, but the cauliflower bites and the burgers were awesome. The staff were fun people too.
There was a board game meetup there a few times and I made some friends there, I rally liked the place.
Mellos for me.
I used to work in the market and go out with friends there at least once a week. We had a lot of great memories and the food was delicious.
I’d guess that with so many top subs going dark, the mixing algorithm needs to dig deeper and it’s not tuned for that. These algorithms are hard to get right at Reddit’s scale.
As an example to populate the frontpage or /r/all it might would need to scan all posts from the private subs before even getting a sizeable amount of candidate posts from the public ones to rank. Then the public subs won’t be in cache nor will caching help as much on those long tail subreddits. Not being in cache means more hits to the DB and that’s going to affect nearly all requests to Reddit.
That’s the exact definition of serfdom.
It’s frustrating that being a mod is first-come-first-serve, but people have been complaining about the system for many many years (/r/Canada is one strong example). So in a way, voting on mods could be a welcome change, but this is clearly not actually for the good of the community.