Why are reproducible builds only on one platform (Android)? Desktop version could have a built-in backdoor and data would be transferred not from the phone, but from the PC)

    •  FarLine99   ( @FarLine99@lemm.ee ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      Molly still exists. They are against those forks that have Signal in their name. But in general, yes, the software development/delivery process is more similar to corporate than open source

    •  ono   ( @ono@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Moxie always did keep rigid control of Signal’s development and operations, often running contrary to users’ concerns and needs. I don’t think that has changed since he left.

      He has argued at length against decentralized messaging. Requiring phone numbers is another example. Being bound to Google services is yet another: Signal dragged their feet on that issue for years, and when they finally did offer a non-google build, they hid it away on an unlinked page of their site and placed it below a “Danger” warning.

      For all their talk of security and their contribution to the field of data privacy, some of their choices seem very strange, and the reasoning they offer is often dubious. I am not convinced that their motivations are aligned with my best interests. Their actions are certainly not.