Do you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo minnix ( @minnix@lemux.minnix.dev ) Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months ago message-square15fedilinkarrow-up1158
arrow-up1158external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.com minnix ( @minnix@lemux.minnix.dev ) Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months ago message-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-square penquin ( @penquin@lemm.ee ) linkfedilink5•11 months agoCan’t bad actors just create their own messaging app and their own encryption methods?
minus-square umami_wasabi ( @umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilink7•11 months agoThey absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
minus-square penquin ( @penquin@lemm.ee ) linkfedilink5•11 months agoOk then, what are these politicians smoking?
minus-square davel [he/him] ( @davel@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoSome of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
minus-square Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoThat’s the point
minus-square helenslunch ( @helenslunch@feddit.nl ) linkfedilink2•11 months agoOr they just use one of the hundreds already written?
Can’t bad actors just create their own messaging app and their own encryption methods?
They absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
Ok then, what are these politicians smoking?
Some of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
That’s the point
Or they just use one of the hundreds already written?