THIS is the infamous UFO photo dubbed by some as the “world’s best” as it shows a huge diamond-shaped object pictured flying over the Scottish Highlands. The so-called “Calv…
Are sufficiently technologically advanced that they’re clearly not from our Earth
As much as I want to believe (!), govs don’t acknowledge that. If it’s not plasma or optical phenomenon like Hessdalen lights, then there’s a chance it’s something else, but nothing says it’s clearly not from our earth.
I remember a viral video that went around where a US general pretty explicitly said it’s “not terrestrial technology” or something along those lines. But you’re right, that also leaves open the explanation that it is terrestrial, just not technological, so I guess they haven’t explicitly admitted that. I also remembered the government had said that UAPs had played with and disabled, then reenabled US nuclear infrastructure in a way that seemed intentional during the Cold War, but I looked it up and that claim only comes from one guy who used to direct the DOD’s UAP observation program, not speaking on behalf of the government. Still, the way that they react to our aircraft pretty cleanly eliminates for me the idea that there’s a non-technological explanation for all of them.
There’s mountains of proof of inexplicable, seemingly intelligently-operated aerial vehicles which match no known human configuration and are thousands of years beyond our capabilities technologically, but no, no actual proof that they’re operated by aliens. But to be honest it seems a bit dense and almost intentionally obtuse to insist it’s more likely that they’re not aliens, since the only other explanation is that there’s some government or corporation on Earth creating aircraft with no discernible means of propulsion, capable of breaking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom as well as accelerating and decelerating to and from very high velocities in a matter of seconds.
I’m not trying to proselytize you. I’m an agnostic myself. I’m, simply, asking what kind/type of proof would you require to be a little convinced that something is going on surrounding this phenomena.
As much as I want to believe (!), govs don’t acknowledge that. If it’s not plasma or optical phenomenon like Hessdalen lights, then there’s a chance it’s something else, but nothing says it’s clearly not from our earth.
I remember a viral video that went around where a US general pretty explicitly said it’s “not terrestrial technology” or something along those lines. But you’re right, that also leaves open the explanation that it is terrestrial, just not technological, so I guess they haven’t explicitly admitted that. I also remembered the government had said that UAPs had played with and disabled, then reenabled US nuclear infrastructure in a way that seemed intentional during the Cold War, but I looked it up and that claim only comes from one guy who used to direct the DOD’s UAP observation program, not speaking on behalf of the government. Still, the way that they react to our aircraft pretty cleanly eliminates for me the idea that there’s a non-technological explanation for all of them.
well that for sure is proof then xD
There’s mountains of proof of inexplicable, seemingly intelligently-operated aerial vehicles which match no known human configuration and are thousands of years beyond our capabilities technologically, but no, no actual proof that they’re operated by aliens. But to be honest it seems a bit dense and almost intentionally obtuse to insist it’s more likely that they’re not aliens, since the only other explanation is that there’s some government or corporation on Earth creating aircraft with no discernible means of propulsion, capable of breaking the sound barrier without creating a sonic boom as well as accelerating and decelerating to and from very high velocities in a matter of seconds.
What type of proof do you require?
Any would be a start.
For example?
something more than someone saying “i saw a viral video”
This post is 11 months old just FYI.
oh, lmao. lemmy things
any good reason why I should believe. Just an off sentence isn’t much.
I’m not trying to proselytize you. I’m an agnostic myself. I’m, simply, asking what kind/type of proof would you require to be a little convinced that something is going on surrounding this phenomena.