What happened to "You're welcome!" as a response to "Thank You"? It's not even included in the canned answers on an apple watch. Have we as a society abandoned it? Melatonin ( @Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • edit-26 months ago message-square71fedilinkarrow-up1115
arrow-up1115message-squareWhat happened to "You're welcome!" as a response to "Thank You"? It's not even included in the canned answers on an apple watch. Have we as a society abandoned it? Melatonin ( @Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • edit-26 months ago message-square71fedilink
minus-square intensely_human ( @intensely_human@lemm.ee ) linkfedilink7•6 months agoExcept “no problem” traditionally means “no problem [despite this situation containing a likely problem]”. It means the person being thanked has gone outside their set of responsibilities to help you. Like “Thanks for letting us borrow your spare tire so we could get our car back to town” -> “no problem”. Here the other person had no responsibility to help with the others’ flat tire, much less lend out a piece of their own safety equipment. “You’re welcome” is the one which means “It is perfectly expected in our current roles that I would have provided this”.
minus-square Pandantic [they/them] ( @Pandantic@midwest.social ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-26 months agoAnd I see it totally opposite. Interesting. Also, can you cite this “traditionally” you reference?
Except “no problem” traditionally means “no problem [despite this situation containing a likely problem]”.
It means the person being thanked has gone outside their set of responsibilities to help you.
Like “Thanks for letting us borrow your spare tire so we could get our car back to town” -> “no problem”.
Here the other person had no responsibility to help with the others’ flat tire, much less lend out a piece of their own safety equipment.
“You’re welcome” is the one which means “It is perfectly expected in our current roles that I would have provided this”.
And I see it totally opposite. Interesting.
Also, can you cite this “traditionally” you reference?