Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Fubarberry   ( @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) M to Steam Hardware@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 年前

Microsoft paves the way for Linux gaming success with plan that would kill kernel-level anti-cheat

www.notebookcheck.net

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • linux_gaming@lemmy.ml
134
external-link

Microsoft paves the way for Linux gaming success with plan that would kill kernel-level anti-cheat

www.notebookcheck.net

 Fubarberry   ( @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) M to Steam Hardware@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 年前
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • linux_gaming@lemmy.ml
Just a moment...
www.notebookcheck.net
external-link
  •  SavvyWolf   ( @savvywolf@pawb.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 年前

    People seem oddly optimistic about all of this, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the solution they came up with still wouldn’t work in Linux. I don’t know how exactly they’d do it, but I can imagine some encryption key or hardware nonsense that Linux can’t replicate.

    •  MentalEdge   ( @MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 年前

      Either way, making all the software developers who insist on messing with the kernel on windows, stop, will be a good thing.

      •  warm   ( @warm@kbin.earth ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 年前

        Yeah, “kernel level anticheat” has become a bit of buzzword in the competitive game scene and people just think it’s better without really understanding what that means. Microsoft could do one good thing here and begin blocking that shit.

    •  thingsiplay   ( @thingsiplay@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 年前

      People seem oddly optimistic

      Hopeful is better than Hopeless.

    •  petrescatraian   ( @petrescatraian@libranet.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      @savvywolf I imagine that they would instead force them to use a certain API that wouldn’t be so easy to replicate on Linux.

      @Fubarberry

      •  Fubarberry   ( @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        API calls would still be a lot easier to replicate through wine/proton than completely uncontrolled kernel access.

Steam Hardware@sopuli.xyz

steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn’t have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

  • Follow the rules of Sopuli
  • Posts must be related to Steam Hardware or Steam OS in an obvious way.
  • No piracy, there are other communities for that.
  • Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
  • This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
  • Have fun.

Link to our Matrix Space

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 15 users / day
  • 745 users / week
  • 1.6K users / month
  • 3.26K users / 6 months
  • 614 local subscribers
  • 20.1K subscribers
  • 1.24K Posts
  • 11.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Moxvallix   ( @Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz ) 
  •  Fubarberry   ( @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code