South Afrulecaimagecross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz Andromeda ( @Workerbee@beehaw.org ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months ago message-square11arrow-up1233
arrow-up1233imageSouth Afruleca Andromeda ( @Workerbee@beehaw.org ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months ago message-square11cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-square Catt ( @Solely_a_Catt@programming.dev ) linkfedilink12•edit-22 months agoNope, the text is correct. not (x or y) <=> (not x) and (not y) not (x and y) <=> (not x) or (not y) Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
minus-square ScreamingFirehawk ( @ScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uk ) linkfedilink5•2 months agoAh yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense
Nope, the text is correct.
Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
Ah yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense