Nope, you just need to allow youtube.com and perhaps ytimg.com to load the front page, but I’ve disabled suggestions and whatnot with youtube enhancer.
At least untill the lobbyist big companies lobby for laws to start suing people for using ad blockers in “violation” of their tos due to a form of “circumvention measure”
At least right now, the code is freely available due to the nature of how HTML, JavaScript and CSS works. - this nature is exactly how a government agency got caught leaking SSNs of teachers, and due to the law, couldn’t perform legal action at what they called a “hacking” attempt.
It feels like its only a matter of time before these shitty companies seek to close that law in order to start calling HTML analysis “hacking”
I don’t think publically available blockers can really win this battle in the end. After all, in the end game Google could just
setup a system that runs a browser
downloads the updates as they come
automatically modify the system so that blockers are detected or they fail to block it
This is possibly even relatively easy with the help of LLMs nowdays.
On the other hand, Google backend code is completely secret and for frontend and protocols they can apply opfuscation techniques, requiring manual updates by blocklist maintainers or adblock developers, taking a lot of time continuously. I suppose LLMs could help here as well, but it’s harder and such attempts could even be detected by Google, because they would need to be tested against their system.
The only solutions I see are to move on from Youtube, have private blockers that don’t become too popular, or tolerate the ads.
Time to use an adblock blocker blocker extension.
I think that would be NoScript.
NoScript would sadly leave you with NoVideo.
It doesn’t though? :s
Does youtube even work with NoScript? I just assumed that google has 50 different scrips running that break the site if they aren’t allowed
Nope, you just need to allow youtube.com and perhaps ytimg.com to load the front page, but I’ve disabled suggestions and whatnot with youtube enhancer.
Would YouTube even work with NoScript enabled?
You just need to allow youtube.com and maybe ytimg.com, but videos work with only youtube.com enabled.
Yep, it’s about to become a never ending fight
Ad blockers vs ad blocker detectors.
At least untill the lobbyist big companies lobby for laws to start suing people for using ad blockers in “violation” of their tos due to a form of “circumvention measure”
At least right now, the code is freely available due to the nature of how HTML, JavaScript and CSS works. - this nature is exactly how a government agency got caught leaking SSNs of teachers, and due to the law, couldn’t perform legal action at what they called a “hacking” attempt.
It feels like its only a matter of time before these shitty companies seek to close that law in order to start calling HTML analysis “hacking”
I don’t think publically available blockers can really win this battle in the end. After all, in the end game Google could just
This is possibly even relatively easy with the help of LLMs nowdays.
On the other hand, Google backend code is completely secret and for frontend and protocols they can apply opfuscation techniques, requiring manual updates by blocklist maintainers or adblock developers, taking a lot of time continuously. I suppose LLMs could help here as well, but it’s harder and such attempts could even be detected by Google, because they would need to be tested against their system.
The only solutions I see are to move on from Youtube, have private blockers that don’t become too popular, or tolerate the ads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw3G80bplTg
Snorkeater-Eaters!