Whelp, here we go again

  •  JillyB   ( @JillyB@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Hot take: this sucks, but YouTube premium is legit. I wish more platforms offered a paid, ad-free way to interact. I don’t feel like figuring out a way around ads but I’m not about to start watching them. So I pay a few bucks a month.

    •  TehPers   ( @TehPers@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I’d be more willing to pay if it wasn’t $10/mo (annual cost) for a bunch of stuff I don’t care about. If they had a cheaper option that was just ad-free (maybe $5/mo?), I’d be down for that.

      I also like what Kagi does with their duo plan for 2 users. Some kind of duo plan for YT premium would be nice as well, since I (and many others, I’m sure) don’t have a family of 6 people.

      •  JillyB   ( @JillyB@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        True. I actually got it as Google play music and it was bundled with YT premium and changed to YouTube music later. As a result of an early bonus, I pay $8/mo. For someone paying full price that doesn’t want the music, I can see why it wouldn’t seem worth it.

    • It’s simply a more honest model - you get content, they get money.

      I would love to be able to pay for an ad-free experience for the various websites and services that I browse and use in a straightforward way instead of being leeched for ad-revenue

    • I don’t have any philosophical objection for paying to use a platform I enjoy, but in the case of youtube, they have been so deliberately detrimental to society in terms of platforming fascists that I feel bad about the prospect of paying them, even if much of the money is going to creators I do like who I’m actually watching