Slayer 🦊 ( @MavTheHack@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English15•2 years agoSurrounding yourself with radicals of any political ideology is generally a bad idea
Except maybe centrist if its even possible to be radical centrist
bear_delune ( @bear_delune@beehaw.org ) English15•2 years agoThis is an extremely shallow perspective
Takatakatakatakatak ( @bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English3•2 years agoNot really. I’d say he sees the modern issues we face better than you. It’s an issue of echo chambers. If you concentrate a community only with people who share your ideology, especially radical ideology it just amplifies it within that community and achieves little else.
People begin to believe that their worldview is the dominant one, because they’re entirely unopposed in their thinking. They are never challenged on any major belief, so the discourse is almost pointless and just spends its time running around the edges of difference.
It also breeds laziness, because you never have to defend your position. Mostly just ends up as communities that share memes with eachother which I shouldn’t need to point out is pretty pointless.
Umbrias ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) English4•2 years agoCentrism isn’t magically enlightened. Depending on the climate it’s arguably incredibly naive. “Radical centrism” just sounds like having no internal philosophy.
Takatakatakatakatak ( @bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English3•2 years agoAnd my comment had nothing to do with bob’s second point about centrism, only the first about surrounding yourself with radicals of any political ideology.
Umbrias ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) English1•2 years agoYou would benefit from being specific when making a comment where your exact words are wholesale endorsement of someone’s worldview. Turning around and immediately changing the entire thesis of your comment makes it seem like your goal was to be contrarian rather than add to the discussion.
A. "Don’t surround yourself with extremists.
I’d surround myself with extreme centrists instead"
B. “That is shallow”
You. “They see modern issues better than you. (…)”
You may want to rethink how you provide endorsement in general, if someone pointing out how shallow of a belief something that is inarguably shallow encourages you to claim that other someone, off of a single comment, literally sees the world better.
Have a good one.
Takatakatakatakatak ( @bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English3•2 years agoYour reading comprehension isn’t my issue to fix. I didn’t say a word about centrism. As soon as your ego got hurt you come at me with this nonsense. It’s cool, you can still grow from this and have it be worth the time taken.
Umbrias ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) English1•2 years agoIt’s a fun game to call failures of rhetoric someone else’s failure of reading comprehension. Flimsy, too.
meteorswarm ( @meteorswarm@beehaw.org ) English3•2 years agoI’d rather learn from Angela Davis, Marsha P Johnson, Judith Butler, and their peers than from whatever “radical centrism” is.
tmw you are trying to build up a leftist meme community over at !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com , so you use lemmy’s wacky implementation of crossposts
tha_frontline ( @tha_frontline@feddit.de ) English2•2 years agoCount me in ✊
welcome aboard!
meteorswarm ( @meteorswarm@beehaw.org ) English1•2 years agoWhat’s the cross posting implementation? I’m not sure I’m getting what it is.
(Subscribed!)
you know crossposts from Reddit? Lemmy has that feature too but it’s not that well implemented (yet)
MrMamiya ( @MrMamiya@feddit.de ) English11•2 years agoOoh man this one’s gonna piss off a whole lot of people who haven’t read a book in 20 years and don’t otherwise have any information about alternatives to capitalism beyond a vague icky feeling.
IntheMesh ( @IntheMesh@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English7•2 years agoPlease don’t bring that shit here. Just keep to lemmygrad dude.
Marxism is a deeply flawed ideology. I recommend reading Karl Poppers writings about marx to understand how fucked it really is.
meteorswarm ( @meteorswarm@beehaw.org ) English6•2 years agoYou’re gonna have to explain a little more about this because on its face I don’t see why I should read what a specialist in the philosophy of science has to say about an ideology based on a historical and sociological analysis of the world. They’re totally different spheres.
Plus, Marxism is not the entire left, and there’s a whole world of thought out there that very likely covers whatever issues you’re thinking of.
VikingHippie ( @VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf ) English2•2 years agoDude literally ignored the word anarchists to better focus on his red scare commie bashing bullshit 😂🤦
simple ( @simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz ) English3•2 years ago Sailing7 ( @Sailing7@lemmy.ml ) English1•2 years agoHoly shit that community is a goldmine :3
simple ( @simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz ) English1•2 years agoWelcome aboard