This is an article written by telegram’s founder and CEO Pavel Durov in 2019 on “Why whatsapp will never be secure”. Your thoughts?
- Arthur Besse ( @cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ) 58•9 months ago
Sure, fuck WhatsApp, but Telegram isn’t even end-to-end encrypted most of the time. Their group chats never are, and their “secret chat” encryption for non-group chats must be explicitly enabled and hardly ever is because it disables some features. And when it is encrypted, it’s with some dubious nonstandard cryptography.
It’s also pseudo open source; they do publish source code once in a while but it never corresponds to the binaries that nearly everyone actually uses.
And the audacity to talk about metadata when Telegram accounts still require a phone number today (as they did five years ago when this post was written) is just… 🤯
State-sponsored exploits against WhatsApp might be more common than against Telegram, or at least we hear about them more, but it’s not because the app is more vulnerable: it’s because governments don’t need to compromise the endpoint to read your Telegram messages: they can just add a new device to your account with an SMS and see everything.
(╯° °)╯︵ ┻━┻
Anything claiming to prioritize privacy yet asking for your phone number (Telegram, WhatsApp, Signal, …) is a farce.
- nutomic ( @nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 11•9 months ago
Telegram isn’t perfect, but it is infinitely better than Whatsapp because it doesn’t belong to Facebook, and also isn’t from the United States. Also it can be used by normies without problem, unlike Matrix or Xmpp or what have you.
- moreeni ( @moreeni@lemm.ee ) 2•9 months ago
Brother, it has servers all over the world (including the US) where it hosts your data unencrypted. Telegram is nearly not inifinitely better than WhatsApp.
- DrFuggles ( @DrFuggles@feddit.de ) 1•9 months ago
Sure, WhatsApp exposes you to US jurisdiction and Meta bullshit. At the same time, Telegram is very friendly with the Kremlin and associated intelligence services. So it basically comes down to whether you want to be spied on by Russian or US entities.
Source: Wired cover story
Wired story from a year ago about the FSB using Telegram to track down political activists.
Thats just speculation. The fact remains most of the Ukrainians (including their president) used telegram to raise their voice.
- DrFuggles ( @DrFuggles@feddit.de ) 1•9 months ago
If you’d read the linked sources, you’d know that it’s not just speculation. Regardless of Telegram’s user base, it cooperates with Russian authorities. That remains true whether or not Ukranians use it to communicate. I’m not blaming Telegram for cooperating with Russian authorities as it’s well known that not doing so leads to drastic authoritarian measures.
But don’t take my word for it: Wikipedia: Blocking of Telegram in Russia
- randint ( @randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz ) English8•9 months ago
Shit, 2019 really was five years ago.
- Dra ( @Dra@lemmy.zip ) 7•9 months ago
Signal is great. Stop being overzealous
- qyron ( @qyron@sopuli.xyz ) 4•9 months ago
Then what is the choice?
- lemonuri ( @lemonuri@lemmy.ml ) 7•9 months ago
Read up on Xmpp or matrix as good alternatives.
- BearOfaTime ( @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ) 2•9 months ago
Simplex - requires nothing, just install. But you connect with other people by sending a code outside of SimpleX. Though they’ve added a directory service for groups.
XMPP
Wire (not Wiremin), though it requires an email account, which is easily addressed with a disposable email.
Signal is very secure from what I’ve read, despite the phone number identifier.
- sqgl ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) 1•9 months ago
SimpleX still has signup bugs:
(1) clicking on the join link from Facebook fails because SimpleX does not strip the FB crap which gets appended.
(2) scanning the QR code fails with your default phone camera app (turns out you must use SimpleX to scan it.
I reported both bugs on github a couple of months ago and nobody had picked up on them.
- Salamander ( @Sal@mander.xyz ) 3•9 months ago
And the audacity to talk about metadata when Telegram accounts still require a phone number today (as they did five years ago when this post was written) is just… 🤯
Not only that, but I believe that they actively try to prevent VoIP numbers from being used to create accounts.
- crispy_kilt ( @crispy_kilt@feddit.de ) 38•9 months ago
What a load of hipocrisy. The dude uses unauthenticated DH for his apps “secret chats”, which a bored student with a laptop can MITM in seconds. Other chats use just TLS, meaning they get to read EVERYTHING.
Use Signal, people.
which a bored student with a laptop can MITM in seconds
No, how can a bored student breach e2ee in seconds? note that no such cases have been reported by any telegram user so far.
- crispy_kilt ( @crispy_kilt@feddit.de ) 9•9 months ago
Because the DH is unauthenticated, as I already said. Users can’t report it because there is no way to tell for them.
Users can’t report it because there is no way to tell for them
Atleast the one who breached can tell? no telegram users data have been seen on dark web yet, no person/org have claimed to get any vulnerability in their system. Also if its that easy to breach why govt’s keep banning telegram for not giving them userdata? despite telegram is the biggest app where most terrorist orgs operate, hub of piracy and illegal things, you can call it “public” darkweb.
- crispy_kilt ( @crispy_kilt@feddit.de ) 5•9 months ago
if its that easy to breach why govt’s keep banning telegram for not giving them userdata
Same reason they ask Apple for backdoors even though they crack iPhones routinely. It’s about legal precedent.
They dont ban apple tho
- nutomic ( @nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 6•9 months ago
Signal is based in the United States, enjoy having CIA and NSA reading all your messages.
- LWD ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 23•8 months ago
deleted
- amanneedsamaid ( @amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz ) English21•9 months ago
“Here’s what someone who has never created a private messenger thinks about Whatsapp’s privacy.”
Why would anyone care about what he has to say? 💀
- detalferous ( @detalferous@lemm.ee ) 5•9 months ago
I’m confused regarding why you don’t consider telegram a private messenger.
- datendefekt ( @datendefekt@lemmy.ml ) 10•9 months ago
It’s been a while since I looked into it, and things might have changed since then, but some stuff off the top of my head:
- Messages are stored on the server, not on the device
- end-to-end encryption not enabled by default
- uses proprietary encryption, making security audits difficult
Apart from that it’s somewhat politically questionable, based in Dubai (I think), with dubious financial backing and Russian developers. Because it’s closed source and the encryption is proprietary, there’s no way of knowing how much info it leaks.
Messages are stored on the server, not on the device
Yes, pretty much necessary to provide multidevice support
end-to-end encryption not enabled by default
True that and telegram sucks big here, but I donth think e2ee can be enabled in a feasible way for multiple devices.
uses proprietary encryption, making security audits difficult
The MTProto isnt open source but its fully documented, there have been security audits on it.
dubious financial backing
No. Pavel Durov have always said since starting he paid for telegram’s servers from his pocket, in recent years telegram has started monetisation programs to cover its costs.
Russian developers
The founders were born in Russia, but they now have dual citizenship of UAE and France. If you are talking about politically questionable, even signal have been accused of having backdoors for CIA.
- amanneedsamaid ( @amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz ) English5•9 months ago
Never has been, no default e2ee, and those exploits that leaked a ton of users locations.
Not to mention, no messenger is verifiably private unless it is fully open source.
- Dra ( @Dra@lemmy.zip ) 5•9 months ago
Telegram isn’t, so you must be very confused indeed
- flying_sheep ( @flying_sheep@lemmy.ml ) 5•9 months ago
Owned by Facebook, which is a giant US company.
Of fucking course it has backdoors.
- mustbe3to20signs ( @mustbe3to20signs@feddit.de ) 14•9 months ago
WhatsApp’s e2e encryption is based on the Signal protocol and active by default. Telegram’s is opt-in. So much for Telegram’s superior privacy…
No. Whatsapp’s metadata is not encrypted and can be used by its parent company, also backups are not secure. While telegram’s is opt in (yeah that sucks and here’s there excuse for that https://tsf.telegram.org/manuals/e2ee-simple), they are as secure as signal’s (if not more).
- crispy_kilt ( @crispy_kilt@feddit.de ) 4•9 months ago
they are as secure as signal’s (if not more
Incorrect. They are trivially breakable as it is unauthenticated DH which is as good as no encryption at all.
good as no encryption at all.
0 data breaches till date.
- mustbe3to20signs ( @mustbe3to20signs@feddit.de ) 1•9 months ago
I’m not saying that WhatsApp is the good guy here, Meta sucks but compared to Telegram I rather trust them if I have to.
And the unencrypted backups are only problematic when you use the automatic Google Drive upload.WHY?
- mustbe3to20signs ( @mustbe3to20signs@feddit.de ) 3•9 months ago
Telegram is a shell company and only offers mediocre, opt-in encryption. The thing I like most about them is their support for 3rd party clients.
I have to use their service for some contacts same as with WhatsApp but I would prefer more secure and privacy friendly alternatives.- BearOfaTime ( @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ) 2•9 months ago
You obviously haven’t seen the charts of the metadata that WhatsApp collects. And we know how anti-consuner, adversarial and anti-privacy Facebook is overall with their tracking pixels, ghost profiles, etc.
Telegram at least doesn’t have the FB dataset. FB knows about me, though I’ve never once in my life been on their website or used anything related to them. Not once. The first I heard of FB I saw immediately the privacy problem with them, and made sure to never have anything to do with them. But they know about me from other peoe posting pics and such, which they then correlate with sites I’ve been on that have tracking pixels. WhatsApp ads a metric shitton of metadata to that pile, with date, time, location, duration of conversations, businesses you’re near at the time, their operating hours, etc, etc. They have a massive, constantly growing dataset, which they can easily correlate elements.
WhatsApp may be encrypted, but I trust Zuck so little that I wouldn’t doubt they capture keystrokes in app before the message is sent. They have the capability as was shown in a recent research article (though no evidence of it happening).
Id rather not use Telegram, but it’s far lesser of the two evils. I’m trying to get folks to other apps. Signal doesn’t sell, SimpleX isn’t quite ready, I think Wire has the same stored encryption key issue, though I may be mistaken (I’m not fully clear how it’s managed).
- ReversalHatchery ( @ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org ) 3•9 months ago
They tell whatever they want until their claims can be validated with the source code. If we take it for granted that they use an original, unmodified version of the signal protocol programming libraries, there are still multiple questions:
- how often do they update the version they use
- what are they doing with the messages after local decryption (receiving), and before encryption (sending)
- how are they storing the secret keys used for encryption, and what exactly are they doing with it in the code
Any of these questions could reveal problems that would invalidate any security that is added by using the signal protocol. Like if they use an outdated version of the programming library that has a known vulnerability, if they analyze the messages in their plain data form, or on the UI, or the keypresses as you type them, or if they are mishandling your encryption keys by sending them or a part of them to wherever
- java ( @java@beehaw.org ) 10•9 months ago
I’m not qualified enough to argue, but I wouldn’t trust Durov. He’s a competitor, after all. And he has a history of questionable decisions.
- ⲇⲅⲇ ( @Aradia@lemmy.ml ) 6•9 months ago
WhatsApp will be never private and secure, while Telegram will be never private. 😁
- labbbb ( @labbbb@thelemmy.club ) 0•9 months ago
Durov is a suspicious RuSSian who very likely works for FSB. Do not use Telegram at all costs!
Crazy racism
- labbbb ( @labbbb@thelemmy.club ) 0•8 months ago
Where is racism there? I’m Russian myself and I know what I’m saying.
Ok, use Telegram, then don’t cry when they leak your data
Yeah you clearly are a russian and you clearly know what you are saying by those intentional caps.
- labbbb ( @labbbb@thelemmy.club ) 1•8 months ago
Haven’t you heard anything about the war with Ukraine?