Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lemmytellyousomething ( lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago

Me and my 756 closest friends...

lemmy.dbzer0.com

message-square
23
link
fedilink
536

Me and my 756 closest friends...

lemmy.dbzer0.com

lemmytellyousomething ( lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago
message-square
23
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • BlackEco ( BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    3 years ago

    Someone should create a leaderboard of websites sharing data with the most “partners”, this week I saw someone on Mastodon posting a screenshot of a website sharing to 1700+ third-parties.

    • Lath ( Lath@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 years ago

      My faulty memory tells me 9gag has somewhere around 3000 or so. But I worked with a lot of numbers recently so I have no idea how accurate that is.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏 ( lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      That sounds like they’re using Admiral’s sh!tty brokerage and anti-adblock thing, saw one site with over 1500 partners. Most difficult one to block because of how frequently they buy domains for adblock evasion…

      One of these days I’m going to just blacklist the IP ranges of their google cloud fleet

  • mozz ( mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 years ago

    Why would you even put the number at that point

    • gencha ( gencha@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 years ago

      Laws

      • mozz ( mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        Ooooooooohhhh

        Makes sense

  • GluWu ( GluWu@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 years ago

    The data broker deletion services all advertise deleting your info from 2-300 agents. Who the fuck are the other several thousand, what are they doing with the data, and how the fuck is any of this legal.

    • kionite231 ( kionite231@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      how the fuck is any of this legal.

      It’s not!

  • MonkderZweite ( MonkderZweite@feddit.ch ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Visit our site as you normally would with the advertising and tracking.

    No, i wouldn’t normally visit any site with the advertising and tracking.

    At least they mention that they track you. Most talk only about ads.

    • Septimaeus ( Septimaeus@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      I do not like them here or there.

      I do not like them anywhere.

  • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    Is the web site sharing with them or does it make you share with them so that your CPU does most of the processing and uploading to each advertising lead leech?

    This would explain why we need more and more powerful/expensive phones just to keep browsing.

    • clever_banana ( clever_banana@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        How much of that do script blockers protect you from?

        • clever_banana ( clever_banana@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            Every geek I knew in the early 90’s was naively evangelizing about the internet ushering in a new age of enlightenment.

            I was too, I admit. Am now optimistic about the benefits of a UBI but, with the above humbling experience, guardedly so — the unintended consequences might be impossible to predict.

            • NotJustForMe ( NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              It is the human condition.

              For a while we believed that automation and robots would lead to people not having to work and furthering culture and arts for all of humanity.

              People always ignore jealousy and greed, the two most prolific attributes of most worker-ant humans.

              • sqgl ( sqgl@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                A study has undermined the greed angle.

                Turns out that (amongst OECD countries) GDP per capita is not correlated with indicators of happiness at all. What is correlated is the degree of income equality…

                and here is the great part…

                Even for rich people. They too have better lives where there is more equitable income distribution. One day they will hopefully realise.

                https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson_how_economic_inequality_harms_societies

                • NotJustForMe ( NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  That study is reinforcing the greed angle, isn’t it? If those poor and unhappy people wouldn’t all be trying to become rich, but would say “fuck it”, let’s just live and be happy, it would all be fine.

                  Nobody could force a few billion people to do slave work for questionable amenities. They just need to stop wanting to be part of the so-called rich and their vision of what progress is. They do it out of greed and wanting to have it all. Technology for everyone. A basic human right, internet and shoes with a name on them.

                  Nothing speaks against a collective endeavor for progress and science to better the whole. But making it a competition:

                  The OECD is part of the problem.

                  Economic Co-operation and Development. Developments for enabling rich people and them competing against each other for resources. Not for creating equal footing. But for creating a controlled slave-market disguised as a developed country.

          • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            “Worst of the worst” means that nothing of value was lost.

            • clever_banana ( clever_banana@lemmy.today ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • The Doctor ( drwho@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                I can’t paywall break them, either. Oh, well.

  • Blackmist ( Blackmist@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    Use Chrome enhanced privacy protection now.

    That way it’ll just be one of their closest friends, who might coincidentally sell it to the other 755.

    • Undertaker ( Undertaker@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 years ago

      Do never use Chrome. Use Firefox based Browsers (Librewolf, Mull)

    • cum ( moon@lemmy.cafe ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you even remotely care about your privacy, get off of an ad-company’s monopolistic browser. Firefox + uBlock Origin is the essentials for at least baseline privacy, then go up from there if you so choose.

  • Hamartiogonic ( Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago
    • So, it’s maximum security, is that clear?
    • Quite clear, sir. Only myself and the rest of the English-speaking world is to know.

    Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=blackadder&episode=s04e01

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 329 users / day
  • 964 users / week
  • 2.51K users / month
  • 6.74K users / 6 months
  • 852 local subscribers
  • 51.3K subscribers
  • 4.56K Posts
  • 59.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t ( k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • Yayannick ( Yayannick@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ranok ( ranok@sopuli.xyz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code