Track_Shovel ( Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agoFleshy Podsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up1160
arrow-up1160imageFleshy Podsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel ( Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ) to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squarehenfredemars ( henfredemars@infosec.pub ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·3 years agoMaybe I’m getting old but what does the “no one” header actually add to the meme? Doesn’t it work just fine without it?
minus-squareKarcinogen ( Karcinogen@discuss.tchncs.de ) linkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 years agoIt’s a vestigial structure from when the meme format was first introduced. It was meant to show doing something despite no one requesting it. It could work without it, but then it’s considered a different meme format.
minus-squareMonkderZweite ( MonkderZweite@feddit.ch ) linkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 years agoWould that be bad?
minus-squareBruceTwarzen ( BruceTwarzen@kbin.social ) linkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 years agoYou don’t get it, it’s reddit funny
minus-squareFaydaikin ( Faydaikin@beehaw.org ) deleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
Maybe I’m getting old but what does the “no one” header actually add to the meme? Doesn’t it work just fine without it?
It’s a vestigial structure from when the meme format was first introduced. It was meant to show doing something despite no one requesting it. It could work without it, but then it’s considered a different meme format.
Would that be bad?
You don’t get it, it’s reddit funny
deleted by creator