Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
jonuno ( jonuno@slrpnk.net )  to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net · 3 years ago

What are your thoughts on website eco certification?

slrpnk.net

message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml
12

What are your thoughts on website eco certification?

slrpnk.net

jonuno ( jonuno@slrpnk.net )  to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net · 3 years ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6839374

Fad or relevant?

  • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Inconvenient truth: the location of your website matters more than its content in terms of footprint. Hosting in on a VPS at Amazon probably has a lower footprint than a raspberry pi in your garage. And overall, it is really, really small.

      • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • Zoop ( Zoop@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Hell yes. I’m glad to see someone get it. Every little bit counts! Something is better than nothing. Even if it’s tiny. It all adds up.

          You totally rock.

          • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

        • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Individuals can make a ton of choices and impact! But don’t make them believe that some things are impactful when they are not. Changing the way you move around, insulating your home, changing your diet, improving your recycling, all these have an impact. Making your webpage 50K lighter? That’s good design sure, but not an environmental action.

          Insulate your water heater before worrying about the few mW a website could save!

          • Xtallll ( Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Only recycle metal and electronics, plastic recycling is a scam. Best case is plastic recycling goes directly into a landfill, worst case it’s bundled and shipped half way around the world and dumped on the beach.

          • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              At one point then the goal is not to lower your impact, it is to make it positive: don’t lower your energy use anymore, become a net producer. We just moved in a house so the insulation and switch to heat pump is our priority but at one point I want solar panels. I want guilt-free air conditioning in summer

              • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

                • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of good reasons to do lighter websites. Environmental impact is not one of them. Either your electricity usage emits CO2, in which case you have more urgent things to do, or your electricity does not, and you don’t care about the additional microwatthour loading a js library took.

                  • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    deleted by creator

    • max ( kittykittycatboys@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      10000% this, make the web lighter an smaller and use less energy mrowr !!

Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net

technology@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@slrpnk.net

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms…

This is not an IT industry news community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 38 users / week
  • 170 users / month
  • 613 users / 6 months
  • 110 local subscribers
  • 4.6K subscribers
  • 493 Posts
  • 1.89K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • KeraKali ( KeraKali@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BOT ( bot@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code