• Rinox ( Rinox@feddit.it ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 years ago

        I don’t think that’s realistic. Even the guy at the local market shouting “get your potatoes here” is technically advertisement.

        What could work instead is to make both the company that advertises and the one that displays the ad liable for the ad itself. If it’s inappropriate, contains malware or is in any way malicious, the company displaying it should also be liable for endangering the customers. Also outlaw tracking for advertisement purposes altogether

    • I left the US to work overseas and when I came back the law changed and everyone was hooked on viagra, the “little purple pill” and everything else…it was VERY obvious what happened…after we sttled down we went to establish care woth a GP & I walked out of my initial appointment with 6 prescriptions.

      ridiculous…

  • Stranac ( Stranac@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    3 years ago

    Using “tipping” as an excuse not to pay workers living wage.

    Displaying prices without tax.

    P.S. This is illegal where I live, but some places would be better off if it were illegal there also.

    • Pringles ( Pringles@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Displaying the price you will pay at the counter is my personal benchmark for civilized society. No price tags? You’re a medieval backwater. Wrong price tags? Go see a shrink, USA. Correct price tags is the way to go.

      • agegamon ( agegamon@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s weird here too because states set sales taxes. I live in Oregon, and we don’t have a standard sales tax here. That means what you see is what you pay at the register for most things, and it’s so freaking nice.

        About the only thing I regularly see is the bottle tax (0.10/can added at the register). That’s refundable too, at least theoretically, so it’s not that bad.

      • Would it change your assessment if they have dynamic price tags that you can only see with the aid of some network-connected augmented reality solution or an online catalog (that you access with a QR code you scan, geotagged software, or something along those lines)?

    • stoy ( stoy@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 years ago

      Lobbying in and of itself isn’t bad, it makes our politicians aware of issues and alternatives.

      Unrestricted lobbying is the problem, I recently read that lobbyists from Amazon would no longer have access cards to the European parliament so they no longer could come and go as they liked.

      I just wonder why lobbyists ever got that access in the first place…

    • Salvo ( Salvo@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 years ago

      Owning shares when you are an elected official with jurisdiction over the industry you own shares in.

      Also, any political figure owning shares in a media organisation, regardless of whether it is traditional media or “new media”.

    • BennyCHill ( BennyHill@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      God the nerds in here are annoying.

      “Ackchually banning lobbying would mean nobody could talk to politicians anymore blah blah…”

      Everyone knows what you mean when you say that lobbying should be illegal.

      • teawrecks ( teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Everyone knows what you mean when you say that lobbying should be illegal.

        People who don’t know anything about lobbying know what you mean when you say lobbying should be illegal.

    • JCPhoenix ( JCPhoenix@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Banning lobbying would mean no one would be able to talk to a politician/official about an issue. Not even writing your local officials, proposing a local ordinance to making bike lanes or spending money to fix-up/improve a local park. Because that’s lobbying. You’re asking a government to wield their official power and/or spend public money, for your (and potentially others’) benefit.

      Even lobbying groups aren’t necessarily bad. The Sierra Club, EFF, ACLU. These are American, but I’m sure there are equivalents of these in other countries.

      So banning lobbying doesn’t really work. Now if you’re talking financial contributions and gifts and nice dinners from those who lobby, yeah that probably needs to be more highly regulated or stopped altogether. Generally speaking, any kind of quid pro quo.

      But just talking to a politician should not be made illegal. In democracies, talking to people, talking to politicians, and trying to convince them to align with your view is the name of the game.

  • Selling life-saving drugs at large multiples of the cost to manufacture + distribute. The most obvious example being insulin.

    Switching political party in the same term that you were elected to office.

    CEOs making 100x the median worker at the same company.

    Assault rifles and other automatic or military-grade weapons. They have no practical purpose in the hands of a citizen. Pistols, shotguns, and hunting rifles should be sufficient for hunting and self defense.

    Generic finance bro bullshit. Frivolous use of bank credit for speculative investment. Predatory lending. Credit default swaps. It’s just a spectrum of Ponzi Schemes. Let’s reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act.

    Non-disclosure of expensive gifts to Supreme Court judges. Looking at you, Clarence.

    Military recruiting at high schools.

    Junk mail. You literally have to pay a company to stop sending it.

    • kali ( kali@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      What the fuck? You have to pay to stop getting junk mail? We in Australia just put a little sign on our letterbox saying ‘no junk mail’ and we stop getting it. That’s insane. Same thing with the insulin comment and some of the stuff other people said like forced arbitration. America is crazy.

    • Some forms of it are illegal, but it’s hard to define what exactly constitutes Gerrymandering. Rather than enumerating all of the ways the Gerrymandering is possible, we really just need to make it so only one specific policy for forming districts is used. I think mathematicians have been proposing models for this that attempt to create districts with roughly uniform distribution of population and isotropic borders.

  • Teon ( Teon@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 years ago

    Tracking & profiting off it.
    Forcing people to be tracked to use a product that they then sell that data should be illegal without your complete, informed consent, and you get to opt out and still use the product.
    All tracking should be regulated. You own your personhood 100% and only you can make money off of that.

  • TheWeirdestCunt ( TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 years ago

    Zero hour contracts in the uk don’t actually have to have an actual contract so if your boss says that something is in your job description you can’t argue otherwise because there was never a contract that said what your job roles were to start with.

  • Something (almost) no one has mentioned: factory farming of livestock. I’m not gonna say a person who engages in subsistence farming shouldn’t be able to keep a coop of chickens for eggs (as long as their chickens are well cared for), but large scale animal husbandry and livestock is devastating to the environment and genuinely cruel.