• kia ( kia@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    The difficulty of any non-mainstream chat app is getting other people to use it. On that list, Signal is the most probable to be recognized by people who don’t have a particular interest in privacy, so it’s more likely to get more people to use it.

    • AprilF00lz ( AprilF00lz@lemmy.ml ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      besides that, and besides the lack of forward secrecy on matrix and session already mentioned by privacy guides, do some of these alternatives have worse security, privacy, or ux than signal in some way?

      • 486 ( 486@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Matrix also does have a pretty big problem with meta data. By default it stores a ton of meta data (at least the reference server implementation does) and I am not sure if this is even a solvable problem without redesigning the protocol. When opting for an alternative to Signal, XMPP is probably the better choice.

      • Corroded ( CorrodedCranium@leminal.space ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s a good question. I wonder if there are available user numbers for them.

        I imagine it’s regional and depends on what communities you are in. SimpleX chat seems pretty popular these days in privacy circles but I could see something like Briar being useful if traditional networks weren’t reliably available for example.