AprilF00lz ( AprilF00lz@lemmy.ml ) to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDownsides of Signal alternatives compared to Signal?message-squaremessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up150file-text
arrow-up150message-squareDownsides of Signal alternatives compared to Signal?AprilF00lz ( AprilF00lz@lemmy.ml ) to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square41linkfedilinkfile-text
I’m thinking of the things listed on the Privacy Guides real-time communication section https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/
minus-square7eter ( 7eter@feddit.de ) linkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years ago Signal stores your encryption key on their servers… That would surprise me. What’s your source for this?
minus-squarejet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) BannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareryannathans ( ryannathans@aussie.zone ) linkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agomaster_key is never stored or sent to the SGX, only c2, the entropy bits. The user’s password is still required to generate the key.
minus-squarejet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) BannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareryannathans ( ryannathans@aussie.zone ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years ago“Very trivial” if they set a proper password? Yet the source you provide says it’s robustly secure
minus-squarejet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) BannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarejet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) BannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
That would surprise me. What’s your source for this?
Removed by mod
master_key is never stored or sent to the SGX, only c2, the entropy bits. The user’s password is still required to generate the key.
Removed by mod
“Very trivial” if they set a proper password? Yet the source you provide says it’s robustly secure
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator