AprilF00lz ( AprilF00lz@lemmy.ml ) to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDownsides of Signal alternatives compared to Signal?message-squaremessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up150file-text
arrow-up150message-squareDownsides of Signal alternatives compared to Signal?AprilF00lz ( AprilF00lz@lemmy.ml ) to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square41linkfedilinkfile-text
I’m thinking of the things listed on the Privacy Guides real-time communication section https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/
minus-squarePossibly linux ( possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoSignal is still secure. If it wasn’t it wouldn’t be used in Military applications.
minus-squarejet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) BannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 years agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarePossibly linux ( possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoIn the US government organizations are trying to protect themselves from each other and themselves. (Its messy) Not to say that Signal is perfect (its not) but if the DoD recommends it and has guidance on how to harden it then it can’t be to bad.
Signal is still secure. If it wasn’t it wouldn’t be used in Military applications.
Removed by mod
In the US government organizations are trying to protect themselves from each other and themselves. (Its messy)
Not to say that Signal is perfect (its not) but if the DoD recommends it and has guidance on how to harden it then it can’t be to bad.