• So I found a trick , people. I use my palm of my hand for my fingerprint reader, instead of a finger.

    The best place ive found is the nub/palm oposite your nuckle at the base of the index finger. Open your hand, bend all fingers back and it will stick out enough to be pressed to the reader.

    Now just waiting for “facial expression unlock” . My phone should only unlock if I smile at it or make a kiss face etc.

  • They can’t force you to cough up a password though.

    On iOS, holding the volume up and lock button long enough that the shutdown screens and whatnot start showing, will disable Face ID login and force the PIN to be entered on next unlock.

      • I’d like a way to require a pattern outside of predefined locations or WiFi networks. Anyone know of a way?

        Lockdown is great but if you fail to put it on then it’s open access for unscrupulous cops.

        •  Otter   ( @otter@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          614 days ago

          You could try one of those automation apps. I remember seeing some triggers for entering and leaving a location, and the advanced ones should be able to use wifi connections/disconnections

          Whether it can change security settings though I’m not as sure about.

            • Running tasker on a unrooted Fairphone 5 There is a function “System Lock” which locks the phone so you have to enter the PIN. I created a task and a widget on the home screen that triggers the task

              I did give tasker some extra rights via adb, which is a quite straight forward process. I think the dev even has a guide for it…

    •  NaN   ( @Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      On iOS, hitting vol up, then vol down, then hold power for a second will instantly lock down and also no danger of accidentally calling 911 or whatever.

      It’s also the fast way to get to the power option.

      • Sure but holding volume up and power until the phone vibrates is a much faster and easier method and there is little worry you might accidentally call 911. It’s also easier to do without looking.

        It has a countdown before calling with vibrations on every number.

          •  Luvon   ( @Luvon@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            For me it’s much easier to lock the phone by holding any volume and power then to remember the sequence needed to force power of the phone.

            Clicking 5 times on power is probably faster, but I forgot that existed and if I’m trying to do something quickly essentially squeezing my phone is easier than trying to tap the correct side 5 times quickly under pressure. And much easier to me then trying to remember the force power off sequence and performing it without looking under stress.

            Especially on the iPhone 15 pros there is now another button so getting the up down up power means finding the correct up button.

            I’ve looked up that sequence numerous times when I’ve needed to force reboot and I still forget it half the time.

  • In Android, holding power and selecting “lockdown” locks out access until your pin is entered. However, if you’re at a protest or something where illegal arrests are likely, turn your phone 100% off.

  • Can they force you to look at your phone though? Attention aware Face ID requires eyes ball on screen.

    And as others have stated, holding volume up and power u til the iPhone vibrates locks the phone requiring the passcode.

  • https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.merrycachemiss.rl

    I found this app that helps to mitigate this issue. It disables fingerprint if your phone gets too far away from a Bluetooth wearable or in several other conditions. It’s worth looking into for sure though it is only in preview for now.

    I think it’s an excellent choice for anybody that’s got to wearable. You could probably do all this with past or two if you had the free time, which I do not.

      • Yeah. It’s pretty rad. I’ve been playing with it all day.

        If I set my watch and airplane mode it also immediately locks the phone, but it also does that when it goes out of range. It looks like the app should work with any Bluetooth device so any wearable should work just fine or even earphones if you really wanted.

  •  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    513 days ago

    For people who want to use multi-factor to unlock their phone, on Android you can set a unlock code for the work profile. So you can have one factor to unlock the main phone, and one factor to unlock the work profile. So any app in the work profile, like signal messenger, would require you to both put your pin in for one factor, your fingerprint in for another factor.

    Some ROMs like graphineos allow you to scramble the pin input pattern, which means the grease on the phone doesn’t give too many clues away as to what your pin is. You get used to it after a day or two

  • 🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The US Constitution’s Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination does not prohibit police officers from forcing a suspect to unlock a phone with a thumbprint scan, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

    The ruling does not apply to all cases in which biometrics are used to unlock an electronic device but is a significant decision in an unsettled area of the law.

    Judges rejected his claim, holding “that the compelled use of Payne’s thumb to unlock his phone (which he had already identified for the officers) required no cognitive exertion, placing it firmly in the same category as a blood draw or fingerprint taken at booking.”

    Payne conceded that “the use of biometrics to open an electronic device is akin to providing a physical key to a safe” but argued it is still a testimonial act because it “simultaneously confirm[s] ownership and authentication of its contents,” the court said.

    The Supreme Court “held that this was not a testimonial production, reasoning that the signing of the forms related no information about existence, control, or authenticity of the records that the bank could ultimately be forced to produce,” the 9th Circuit said.

    The Court held that this act of production was of a fundamentally different kind than that at issue in Doe because it was “unquestionably necessary for respondent to make extensive use of ‘the contents of his own mind’ in identifying the hundreds of documents responsive to the requests in the subpoena.”


    Saved 64% of original text.