• TimeSquirrel ( TimeSquirrel@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      129
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      My kid discovered that he can hit the “report” button on the YouTube app on the TV to skip the ads immediately. So now every ad gets reported as “inappropriate”.

      I’m proud of him.

    • stewie3128 ( stewie3128@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m of two minds about people not adblocking.

      On one hand: Ads are gross noise pollution, and people are increasingly unaware of all the noise around them (or the noise they’re generating) largely because they’ve been passively trained to “tune out” ads. Also consumerism.

      On the other hand: As long as there are a significant amount of people oblivious to the possibility of adblock, corporate ad mobsters and the other worst people in the world out there will largely leave those of us blocking their ads alone. If everyone ran adblockers, we’d definitely live in a world of WEI… and probably worse. So, maybe all those people are watching ads so that I don’t have to, as the YouTube thumbnails say.

      • Damage ( Damage@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve shown a colleague after seeing him browse an horrendous fantasy football website. He couldn’t believe the difference between before and after.

    • lemmyreader ( lemmyreader@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I also don’t understand it. But now I am wondering if we would not have had those “careless” (indifferent ? ignorant ?) millions of people not blocking ads then Google and others may have started pushing anti-adblock measures years earlier, no ?

    • zagaberoo ( zagaberoo@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The way people talk about people who don’t block ads is so funny.

      I understand and respect the reasons people choose to use blockers, but ads honestly just aren’t that problematic for me in practice and are easy to avoid and ignore.

      • scoobford ( scoobford@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ads have been known to contain drive-by malware. Even if you don’t mind seeing ads (which personally I don’t mind unless they’re very intrusive), an adblocker is important for online safety.

            • zagaberoo ( zagaberoo@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              There’s no mention of anything like zero-days in that article. They only mention that it can target all major OSes, with no mention of cutting edge versions also being vulnerable.

              Hilariously, the article directly supports my position as well:

              The good news for some, at least: it likely poses a minimal threat to most people, considering the multi-million-dollar price tag and other requirements for developing a surveillance campaign using Sherlock

              That’s a big part of my whole point. People who don’t do even a modicum of actual thought about a practical threat model for themselves love pretending that ad blocking isn’t primarily just about not wanting to see ads.

              If Israel or some other highly capable attacker is coming after you, then fine, you really do need ad blocking. In that case malware in ads is going to be the least of your concerns.

              Attacks that cast such a wide net as to be the concern of all web users are necessarily less dangerous because exploits need to be kept secret to avoid being patched.

              There’s nothing wrong with taking extra precautions; I’m certainly not saying blocking ads is a bad idea. It’s the apparent confusion that an informed, tech-savvy person might choose not to block ads that makes me laugh.