There is nothing wrong with, and everything right about, small penises. The more we mock men’s behavior and bodies, the more we ourselves create awful 4×4 behavior.
All penises are good. Sometimes the people attached are awful.
Alternatively, imagine saying this about another body part on another gender.
Does anyone with any particular body characteristic overcompensate by purchasing a land rover or it it just meant to mock them by associating them with something they, and the person making the association, perceive as negative?
Generally vagina size is mostly incels getting it wrong, but since there is lots of body dismorphia with breast size as well as people who they may be trying to attract having sometimes openly stated preferences in it, I’d say chest or ass size which can be similar is more likely.
Not that cars would be the compensation. Oh, how the face looks too, as I’ve definitely seen people accuse women of dressing “slutty” because they’re a “butterface.”
Cis men should have their gender dysphoria treated instead of trying to distract themselves with vanity projects like oversized vehicles. Just because you like their body the way it is doesn’t mean you can dictate what they should want. Nothing wrong with a small penis, but that doesn’t mean everyone has to want that.
Alternatively, imagine saying this about another body part on another gender.
Trans women eggs should probably realize they’re eggs and transition (if that’s feasible where they are and if not, go to somewhere where it is feasible) rather than having dysphoria beards, working out stereotypically masculine muscles groups, and acting hypermasculine to cover-up for their insecurities.
There is nothing wrong with, and everything right about, small penises. The more we mock men’s behavior and bodies, the more we ourselves create awful 4×4 behavior.
All penises are good. Sometimes the people attached are awful.
Alternatively, imagine saying this about another body part on another gender.
This is some small titty energy.
… It doesn’t hit the same.
Girls with small titties don’t overcompensate by buying land rovers
Does anyone with any particular body characteristic overcompensate by purchasing a land rover or it it just meant to mock them by associating them with something they, and the person making the association, perceive as negative?
deleted by creator
She must have a small vagina?
More like “mini cruisers are for women without tits” or “Siennas are for fat women,” or something, but you were thinking in the right direction!
Generally vagina size is mostly incels getting it wrong, but since there is lots of body dismorphia with breast size as well as people who they may be trying to attract having sometimes openly stated preferences in it, I’d say chest or ass size which can be similar is more likely.
Not that cars would be the compensation. Oh, how the face looks too, as I’ve definitely seen people accuse women of dressing “slutty” because they’re a “butterface.”
Trying to get my head round your logic here, while ignoring your holier-than-thou boringness
You’re saying we persuade people to buy big cars if me mock their penises, or they’re more prone to buy one due to their tiny penis?
Cis men should have their gender dysphoria treated instead of trying to distract themselves with vanity projects like oversized vehicles. Just because you like their body the way it is doesn’t mean you can dictate what they should want. Nothing wrong with a small penis, but that doesn’t mean everyone has to want that.
Trans women eggs should probably realize they’re eggs and transition (if that’s feasible where they are and if not, go to somewhere where it is feasible) rather than having dysphoria beards, working out stereotypically masculine muscles groups, and acting hypermasculine to cover-up for their insecurities.
Is it usually at this point in the conversation when people excuse themselves and go talk to the cat instead of you? 😂