I understand that it may be problematic sometimes but this was very smooth. I didn’t even say anything.
A: what’s your number for the whatsapp group Me: I don’t have whatsapp because of facebook. B: ok, we have to use signal then A: ok
And that was it. Life can be very easy sometimes
- Damage ( @Damage@feddit.it ) 90•2 months ago
At first from the title it seemed like they changed app to avoid you
- fine_sandy_bottom ( @fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•2 months ago
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s how it plans out.
A regular group chat and another signal one for when you specifically need to talk to OP.
- fosho ( @fosho@lemmy.ca ) English1•2 months ago
yeah, some title gore going on here.
- MerchantsOfMisery ( @MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml ) 55•2 months ago
Before Signal made the boneheaded move of removing SMS support, it was so much easier for me to pitch the idea of using Signal to my friends and family, most of which eventually did make the shift from SMS to Signal messages for reasons like ease of use when it came to group chats, sending images/videos, voice clips, etc.
But now? Now it’s one of those embarrassing moments where I hear back from people basically all saying "your tech recommendations are usually on point but uh, what happened with Signal???" because the app just abruptly stopped supporting SMS and ruined the seamless appeal. SMS support was the perfect way to ease people into shifting towards Signal messages and now the only damn people I know who still know Signal are my most privacy-minded friends/family, while everyone else has switched back to WhatsApp.
Clearly I’m not bitter…😅 But I mean like, come on. I had the most notorious luddites in my social circle make the switch to Signal and they loved it. The shift from SMS to Signal messages was so smooth so many of them didn’t even have that "I miss [SMS stuff]", plus they LOVED that Signal could be used on their laptops in addition to their phones. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh this annoys me so much.
- BaroqueInMind ( @BaroqueInMind@lemmy.ml ) English10•2 months ago
Why did they remove SMS support?
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English5•2 months ago
What were you using SMS for?
- Strawberry ( @Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 9•2 months ago
SMS is still the dominant message format in some countries
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English1•2 months ago
But you are already on Signal.
Also I live in a country where SMS is very common
- ulterno ( @ulterno@lemmy.kde.social ) English49•2 months ago
I have a feeling B wanted to use Signal, but expected it to be difficult to make others shift. When OP gave the opportunity, B came in and swyped it right away,
- xelar ( @xelar@lemmy.ml ) 32•2 months ago
Still, you were lucky that your colleagues are aware of alternatives and will use it (I hope). I wonder though if people will migrate because of you. Its tough to encourage others to communicate Signal while majority use Messenger or Whatsapp. Their reasoning for that is the most friends and family member are on mainstream solutions.
Signal is an interim solution imo for most people, which I also recommend. Not too extreme, not to “geeky”, which introduces them to alternative app world.
- NigelFrobisher ( @NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ) 15•2 months ago
What did you do to offend them?
- cheesymoonshadow ( @cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world ) 3•2 months ago
I first read it that way too.
- Kit ( @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 14•2 months ago
Why would a workplace need a group chat? Aren’t there any enterprise tools in place to achieve that?
- just_an_average_joe ( @just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English18•2 months ago
Small companies and startups like to save money
- Baggins ( @Baggins@feddit.uk ) English8•2 months ago
Cannot access work intranet (Teams etc.) from personal phones. Don’t have work phones. They all use WhatsApp so reluctantly, so do I.
- Kit ( @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 2•2 months ago
I would never join a group chat like that. If they need to get ahold if me after hours, they can call me.
BTW Teams doesn’t live on Intranet. There’s no reason they wouldn’t be able to open up Teams to BYOD beyond incompetence.
- Baggins ( @Baggins@feddit.uk ) English7•2 months ago
I know Teams doesn’t live on the intranet, but I’m not going to put work software on my own phone. Policy needs it to set up a work profile and I then can’t use fingerprint, face or a 4 digit pin. And all the shite that flows through Teams would be be piling up, just like it does on the PC at work, brilliant when you’re only in a couple of days a week. They want me to use a phone? Provide one.
The WhatsApp group is for us to send updates about traffic, if someone can cover a shift etc. it’s not an official work thing. I could of course not use it and just text people. That’s really just making my life difficult whilst sat up here on my high horse with a self righteous look on my face, whilst I miss the chance of an extra shift.
- Kit ( @Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 2•2 months ago
Denying putting work stuff on your phone is absolutely valid. The company should provide a company device in that case. And if you do agree to put company data on your phone, they should give a monthly stipend towards your phone bill. That’s how every org I’ve worked at has approached it.
- filcuk ( @filcuk@lemmy.zip ) 2•2 months ago
That requires a business login on your personal device, which is typically against company policy.
Although, so should be sharing work info outside of corporate channels, so what do I know.
- !xowAT4Z3Q ( @phpinjected@lemmy.sdf.org ) 13•2 months ago
my workplace only IRC and xmpp for work related chat
- Wildly_Utilize ( @Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub ) English5•2 months ago
That sounds pretty based
- ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡ ( @LEVI@feddit.org ) English12•2 months ago
these 20 people are awesome :D
- halvar ( @halvar@lemm.ee ) 11•2 months ago
Sure and then Santa gave everyone free librebooted thinkpads.
- communism ( @communism@lemmy.ml ) 11•2 months ago
In all my years of not using WhatsApp this has never happened to me lol. At best I’ve gotten some people to message me individually on Signal but not entire groups
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English9•2 months ago
Damn…
You must be really good
- jbk ( @jbk@discuss.tchncs.de ) 9•2 months ago
dream team
- Clot ( @clot27@lemm.ee ) English8•2 months ago
Wow, congrats.
- krolden ( @krolden@lemmy.ml ) 6•2 months ago
Now tell them you just switched to matrix and see if they’ll follow
- GolfNovemberUniform ( @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml ) 55•2 months ago
Never abuse kind people. That’s what breaks them.
- krolden ( @krolden@lemmy.ml ) 3•2 months ago
Its a joke if that wasn’t obvious.
I don’t have to. Matrix is coming anyway. It’s not an if but a when.
For official (internal) company communication though I will advertise matrix instead of signal. I’ll report back once I’ve talked to the right people about it.
- krolden ( @krolden@lemmy.ml ) 1•2 months ago
Nice
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English2•2 months ago
Matrix can be pretty unstable at times
I like Mattermost but it isn’t federated
- ulterno ( @ulterno@lemmy.kde.social ) English5•2 months ago
Do you have a vacancy?