Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz )  to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 years ago

Germany votes for historic boost to defence and infrastructure spending

www.bbc.com

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • globalnews@lemmy.zip
146
external-link

Germany votes for historic boost to defence and infrastructure spending

www.bbc.com

misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz )  to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • globalnews@lemmy.zip
The move alters the German constitution, allowing the country to increase its military spending.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder why the BBC author seems to have explicitly chosen only images with what appears to be female Bundeswehr soldiers? Kinda odd choice 🤔

    • misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      My money is on subconscious fear of German women. Maybe they grew up on Allo Allo!

      • jlow (he/him) ( jlow@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Interesting, for me it seems to be supposed to convey “military good and sexy now” vibes.

        • misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m a Pole so I probably didn’t consider German military could be good news or sexy, even subconsciously. But then you have those Hugo Boss uniforms. Hmmmm.

          • jlow (he/him) ( jlow@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            100% agree with you that military isn’t good or sexy ever but comparing this photo to like a grizzly, manly man in the mud (which could be sexy as well, lol) I think this image wants to say “Look we’re not the reactionary, sexist boys club we once were (which is a complete lie, probably), come join us, we even got women now!” So basicallly propaganda.

            • misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I wouldn’t make this judgment based on a single news piece with 2 pictures total but I’ll be on a lookout if this is a pattern.

          • hallunke23 🇺🇦:nona: ( hallunke23@troet.cafe ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sorry, I don’t get what you’re talking about. I know that Hugo Boss used to make uniforms for the Nazis. But what does that have to do with today’s uniforms???
            (For those who are unaware of the relationship between Hugo Boss and the Nazis, here’s an article for reference: https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/historiker-hugo-boss-hat-nachweislich-vom-100.html )
            @misk @jlow

        • PeteZa ( PeteZa@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          They can be sexy and fierce at the same time.

    • Linke Socke ( LinkeSocke@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I only see 2 pics in the Article. Would you also wonder why only Men were showed if there were only 2 pics of Men?

      • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If it was an article about an organisation that is 95% or so female then yes 🤷

        • Melchior ( Melchior@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It is not that bad. 13% of soldiers are women and for civil jobs in the Bundeswehr it is 37%.

        • Linke Socke ( LinkeSocke@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yea you are correct that it was probally done on purpose but Its also probally the least important part to point out from the article haha thats why I kinda wonderd about your Comment :)

  • Akasazh ( Akasazh@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    If they are clever they invest in factories in the east, to hurt the afd electorate

  • 野麦さん ( nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • NewDay ( NewDay@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As a German I can say that this picture makes no sense. Merkel was one of the most left-wing Chancellor of all time. Merkel’s coalition has paused compulsory military service and cut the Bundeswehr to the bone. During her time, the Bundeswehr received only 37 billion a year in some cases, although the German economic institutes have calculated that the Bundeswehr needs around 2% of GDP to maintain the status quo. 37 billion is less than 1%.

    • federal reverse ( federalreverse@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Eril ( Eril@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Still needs a 2/3 majority in the Bundesrat (the “Senate” of germany). The votes should be there, but it is not 100% a given, because of some state governments with mixed opinions. They will vote on it in a session on friday. Let’s hope for the best!

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 388 users / day
  • 1.16K users / week
  • 2.34K users / month
  • 5.55K users / 6 months
  • 38 local subscribers
  • 12K subscribers
  • 7.82K Posts
  • 27K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • federal reverse ( federalreverse@feddit.org ) 
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • adr1an ( anzo@programming.dev ) 
  • !Europe Mod Team ( EuroMod@feddit.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code