Nano! Nano!
yup, used pico with pine 30 years ago (I’m old) and switch to nano of course, I still use nano about daily (linux maintaining, config file, etc)
edlin ftw!
thatd be if i used cp/m but i use ms-dos (well, also winxp and linux)
Nano here, maybe only because it’s too easy to type in console for me…
Cat for the real one’s
Then you can touch it 👀
Nano, Vim, KWrite, Libreoffice for all I care 😅 They all get the job done with identical results.
Vim. I used to use emacs in the mid-90s, but I just found that vi was more universally supported. At this point, I am too old and stubborn to learn anything else. I am really efficient in vim.
thats the exact same reason why i insist on doing things locally even if people nag me to use a webapp that does the same thing as the program. specifically, powerpoint/impress and canva (which is web-based). powerpoint if im on windows, impress if im on linux, and powerpoint has to be specifically the 2007 version.
My coworkers, especially the younger ones, are surprised when they watch me work in vi. Lots of “how did you do that so fast?”
thats my clasmates whenever i pull out either linux (not even bash) or cmd
Micro
why not also pico or nano anyways
I just wanted to say something different, I saw people commenting nano and pico
understandabke
