Honestly, just using this as an excuse to reiterate that J.K. is using her Harry Potter wealth to actively hurt trans people.
You must log in or # to comment.
This is why I get upset seeing people who openly participate in the fandom.
Imo you can still be a fan. Yes, the books have aged poorly and it’s good to be aware of the odd implications of some of the lore but the most important thing should be not to give her any money over it.
Yup. If you’re a fan, just pirate all Harry Potter stuff.
The problem is that even when you pirate the stuff you are maintaining its popularity. You’d have to pirate everything, never buy merch, talk about it, participate in anything related to it, never show the pirated media to any friends, etc. What is the likelihood of that?
Same as music. Separate art from the artist.
Separate the artist from money 🏴☠️
We don’t give money to transphobes if we can avoid it.
Books, movies and games are very easy to avoid.
…and? I don’t need to avoid the content, just giving them money. Easy
fmhy.netAnd… that is different from separating art from the artist.
Hope that helps.
How? Definitions I can find are all similar to this:
Separating the art from the artist is a known concept defined as a manner to discern people’s appreciation of an artist’s work from their hate for the creator’s actions or opinions.
That is all. Consuming the art and appreciating it no matter who created it. This doesn’t mean it has to be purchased. The idea is simply that you don’t have to say, burn Rowling’s books that you have purchased once upon a time as mentioned in the opinion article. Or delete some artist’s music from your music player, put movie DVDs into microwave oven, delete all photos of a certain painting, etc…
How is the sentiment of separating the artist from the art different from not giving money to transphobes?
Literally every part of it.
Hope that helps.
I’ve seen many people at conventions associate with ghe Marauders fanfic than the actual harry potter books. Treating that as the ‘canon’ books, as to not give money to JK.
Almost all Harry Potter stans are already aware. They just don’t care enough to do anything other than wring their hands about it.
What a sad miserable cunt.
I’ll follow their advice, they lose money by piracy
how many times do I have to pirate the new show for the to go bankrupt?
I wouldn’t pirate it for shits and giggles since that still communicates interest in the property. If you have to have to engage with it for whatever reason, piracy is the most ethical way to do so of course.
same,
however, if it comes out that it is an amazing show (doubt it) i might give it a shot, but only through piracy.
What is the organisation she is donating to?
After initial screening, applications go through a rigorous assessment by the JKRWF board,” the website continues. “Awards are at the discretion of the board, and limited to closely defined legal actions with a clear goal and timespan.”
Thanks. Hmmm. Do we know who’s on the board (besides herself presumably)? I can’t actually find the JKRWF site.
Her net worth is insane. She wrote one of the most popular and successful books series on the planet. This is what she’s doing instead of retirement. She’s like all the multi billionaires that work until death as opposed to fucking off to Italy or the south of france. Just worse.
