Me, who has learned where the ladyparts lay, enjoys taking time to get to know them and typically doesn’t need mechanical assistance due to sufficient preamble.
a man of culture
It can be wet down there but still bad friction though. Lube is a game changer.
TBH no idea how the foreskin helps with jerking a fully erect penis. Do you pull it all the way up, somehow? Or do you just have that much smegma?
you can move the skin up and down, so ur hand doesnt have to slide
My foreskin doesn’t go all the way up when I have a full erection, and I don’t think that’s rare.
Edit: Curious amount of downvotes. Are you grossed out by anatomical descriptions of healthy male genitals? If so, WTH are you doing in this thread? Do you not think that it’s rare? Then comment instead of downvoting, or at least in addition to it.
I am circumcized so I know foreskin is not a prerequisite for that.
Yeah, but it goes up further and with the head of the penis being the most sensitive area, having that foreskin is quite useful.
It must depend on the person because so am I and I certainly don’t have enough slack to use it like that.
It’s not a prerequisite, it’s just that it works better.
… who’s out here sliding their hand? The skin slides relative to the deeper layers, foreskin or not
people that use lube
every now and then i’m reminded to be thankful i got to keep mine, jesus christ lmao
I’m uncircumcised, actually.
It rolls over the glans.
So you just kind of. Like. Roll it.
Why don’t people just use precum? It’s plenty slippery.
deleted by creator
Personally I would rather get bottom surgery
Same
I’d honestly love to see a world war between circumcised and uncircumcised folks. I wonder who would win.
Uncircumcised is the default and probably has a numerical advantage, but once you get circumcised, you can’t go back. The circumcised can always convert people, and there’s nothing the uncircumcised can do to stop their POWs from being forced to switched sides.
However, what about everyone who doesn’t have a penis? Would their allegiance lie with the uncircumcised? Would people who’ve experienced genital mutilation join the circumcised? Who would formerly circumcised people who now don’t have penises join? Would bottom surgery make someone automatically join team circumcision?
This whole thought experiment begs many questions.
Oh my, TnJessica, I was not expecting you here :D
I’m a mod here
I meant more the theory than you specifically.
Nonetheless, happy with everything ^ ^
Old enough to have no choice in the matter. We should be pissed at the church, backward medicine and our parents, not each other.
Is the church even part of this? In most countries, christians don’t practice circumcision.
They did heavily in lots of countries including mine. For decades and decades and decades. It was framed in two ways. You could go to hell if you didn’t or you could get really sick and it could fall off. Wonderful direction from the church. In my specific case Catholic Church.
That’s wild, I didn’t expect that even the catholic church gets in on this. Where I live, this would sound completely absurd to most christians.
Obviously the circumcised. They would easily convert the captures enemy soldiers to their side but the uncircumcised would not be able to do it.
jokes on you, i wear chainmail
what do you think the Iraq war was, sweaty?ignorant white colonist shows their racismWasn’t the Iraq war mostly between muslim Iraqis, who are almost always circumcised, and US-americans, who are also usually circumcised?
TIL Iraqis circumcise their boys!!
I will go with my original thought then, the Crusades - I think European Christendom had not yet incorporated circumcision at the time, but the Muslim world was practicing circumcision, so that would be a war between the circumcised and the uncircumcised?
*Skin issue
🤢🤮😭
