• floofloof ( floofloof@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    221
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Just for convenience (since it’s hard to read the screenshot on a phone), here’s the text:

    GrapheneOS is being heavily targeted by the French state because we provide highly secure devices and won’t include backdoors for law enforcement access. They’re conflating us with companies selling closed source products using portions of our code. Both French state media and corporate media are publishing many stories attacking the GrapheneOS project based on false and unsubstantiated claims from French law enforcement. They’ve made a clear threat to seize our servers and arrest our developers if we do not cooperate by adding backdoors. Due to this, we’re leaving France and leaving French service providers including OVH. We need substantial help from the community to push back against this across platforms. People malicious towards us are also using it as an opportunity to spread libel/harassment content targeting our team, raid our chat rooms and much more. /e/ and iodéOS are both based in France, and are both actively attacking GrapheneOS. /e/ receives substantial government funding. Both are extremely non-private and secure which is why France is targeting us while those get government funding. We need a lot more help than usual and we’re sending our the first ever notification to everyone on the server because this is a particularly bad situation. If people help us, it will enable us to focus more on development again including releasing experimental Pixel 10 releases very soon.

  • HumanOnEarth ( HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    10 months ago

    If the state can’t protect its people from the damage that technology and capitalism can do, they have no right to prevent people from protecting themselves.

    Fix climate change. Tax billionaires. Address the housing crisis. Then we can talk about taking away privacy in the name of upholding the law.

    • manxu ( manxu@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Doesn’t even have to be a lofty goal like fixing climate change. I’d settle for the backdoors not leading to disclosure and scams, as any such weakening of security or privacy inadvertently does.

      When there was the leak of ID photos from that one site (forget which one) I sighed, because neither the users nor the site wanted to keep ID photos around, but the government made them do that. It was the most predictable result I could have imagined.

      • I’d also settle for the billionnaires getting a French revolutionary treatment. It’s high time the reactionary leeches get what they fucking deserve: they must pay their taxes, hand over all their media ownership to the public, and a shitton more. And if they don’t want that, then by police force, or by the will of the people.

  • foremanguy ( foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not to protect /e/os and Iode (neither to promote the french laws), but I would like to have real source of what’s happening, what /e/os and idoe didn’t do right, when they conveyed fakes about graphene…

    Not to say but the graphene community (mainly his leader) is always having drama with some people. So real proofs and explanations would be greatly appreciated. Wouldn’t like to say black or white to this subject and would like to nuance the post

    • pmk ( pmk@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gael Duval (/e/os) wrote as a response:
      "I’d like to state *very clearly* that Murena and e Foundation are not related in case to this ridiculous and pseudo-drama.

      What we seek is to totally ignore these guys, and have nothing to do with them.

      And again, and again, despite what they are repeating, we are NOT competitors, as we are not in the hardened-security market spaces."

        • foremanguy ( foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Again not to defend anyone but you fell in the trap.

          1 - These roms never said anything like we’re superior and most secure (something that grapene is proudly advertising)

          2 - By saying these words, only unjustified hate is bring to some FOSS projects and slow down development and adoption to the whole public
          And people are just gonna hate Graphene cause of this and other hating alternatives roms cause graphene said something…

  • From France: news outlets began parroting government stating GrapheneOS is used by narcos.

    GrapheneOS reacted strongly.

    However, France is on a very shitty auth-right trend (including arresting Telegram founder) so the reaction is very understandable.

        • CoyoteFacts ( CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is actually a really relevant note, because all of us are the “wolf-watchers” in that sense. We’re all trying to keep track of accountability on stuff like this and use what little power we have to protest and counteract government overreach and abuse. When hyperbole and gaslighting are used by those “crying wolf” it makes our jobs that much more difficult. Even after reading through the HN thread I still am not sure if the threat is real or imagined. There are a couple paranoid leaps in logic asserted as fact, and that makes it impossible to know which other “facts” are actually just opinions. By all means, they should GTFO of France if they feel they might be threatened, but turning around and saying they’re being imminently attacked by France makes it so much harder to understand what’s actually happening.

          • frongt ( frongt@lemmy.zip ) Banned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sort of.

            Governments, including France, want to weaken security. Sometimes they intentionally conflate illegality with security. It sounds like that’s what’s happening here, with an assist from the journalist who hasn’t done any investigation.

      • I doubt it. I think these kind of comments are a very classic “divide and conquer” tactic.

        We should not be divided, but stand behind both e/ and Graphene as perfectly good privacy defenders.

        • CoyoteFacts ( CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          To me it reads like Graphene is saying /e/ is “actively attacking” them as a puppet of the government of France. How do you reconcile them both being perfectly good when either one is engaging in this behavior, or one is lying about it? It’s okay to support both projects overall and not agree with every action they take, but that doesn’t mean you have to turn a blind eye to accountability when they are making bad choices (to put it lightly). In any other project, criticism would lead to positive changes and correction of bad behavior. Because Graphene doesn’t work like that, I think it’s important to understand their history so that everyone is more informed when they make serious accusations about other innocent projects like this.

      • houjou ( houjou@jlai.lu ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        all I see is graphene attacking /e/ . I mean yes we get it they are less secure but still in the industry standard. It’s just not for the same users.

  • frongt ( frongt@lemmy.zip ) Banned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is there any information on this from a more reliable source than a screenshot of a discord message from a generic account? Especially from a project whose leader is known for persecutory claims.

  • sous-merde ( Pierre121000@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    State surveillance begins when protecting privacy is treated as a suspect act.
    Preventing crimes apparently necessitates to forbid any resistance to surveillance.
    So much for France/Europe being a defender of (digital )rights.

      • AnimalsDream ( AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Secure from what? Security isn’t a dick measuring contest, it’s a living process and arms race. If someone is trying to tell me, “My stuff is the mostest of the biggest security because, hard!” - what I’m hearing is that their threat modeling is ill-defined, maybe not defined at all, and something misleading is going on. Especially when the lead dev of a platform appears to be screaming and shouting about everyone else with a dubious persecution complex.

        • You could literally read the GraphineOS documentation whenever you want where it clearly outlines how their hardening works, what security systems they have in place, and how their encryption works. I will warn you its incredibly technical, of course you wouldn’t know that because people like you who cant bother to even look at the website (https://www.grapheneos.org/features) wouldn’t know what any of it acturally means.

          Tldr: for people who dont understand technical terminology they can trust the project, for people who do they can literally just read the documentation

          • ganymede ( ganymede@lemmy.ml ) 
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            well said!

            imo it’s not a coincidence the public are being steered away from supporting graphene. it’s one thing to see the general public do this (they will do whatever their told), but seeing countless people who supposedly should know better its quite disturbing.

    • Both, and probably more Graphene.

      France’s put up a lot more mass surveillance these days. The fact that the French state tries to blackmail defenders of privacy, should tell you enough.

  • medem ( medem@lemmy.wtf ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Speaking of unsubstantiated accusations, do we have actual, reliable information about what is really going on? Any link in either French or English appreciated.